A Closer Look at Co-operative Bank Of Kenya Quarter 1 Results

By Soko Directory Team / May 22, 2017



Co-op online banking

Co-operative Bank of Kenya announced 1Q17 numbers marking a 6.0 percent y/y decline in EPS to KES 0.66. The numbers were weaker than their peer bank, KCB.

Disappointingly, there was notable weakness on both Net Interest Income (NII) and Non-Interest Revenue (NIR) as they declined 1.6 percent y/y and 2.2 percent y/y respectively.

Some of the positives that emerged from the results were as follows:

  1. Modest cost growth, total OPEX up 4.7 percent y/y.The main cost element was staff costs which ticked up 6.8 percent y/y with other operating costs rising 4.1 percent y/y. Overall, the bank remains keen on improving efficiency with 88 percent of transactions now taking place on alternative channels. As there are no immediate cost pressures, we do not expect a significant uptick in CTI going forward (1Q17 it stood at 47.9 percent from 45 percent in 1Q16). Management’s FY17 target CTI is at 50 percent, whose attainment we believe will be tied to shielding the bank from further income decline.
  2. Non-Performing Loans (NPL) levels remained stable q/q. NPL ratio stood at 4.6 percent from 4.8 percent in 4Q16 and 4.0 percent in 1Q16. Overall this remains below the overall sector average of 9.3 percent as at October 2016. We are happy with Co-op Bank’s management in keeping a stable NPL ratio when the sector is facing significant loan book quality decline. We expect management to remain within its FY17 target of 4.5 percent. Loan loss provision was up 20 percent y/y. Management is keeping in line with historical coverage levels of about 50 percent and we are yet to see indication of additional aggressive provisioning.

However, there were some negatives:

  1. Net Interest Margin (NIM) erosion to 8.5 percent.This is down from 9.3 percent in 4Q16. The bank’s management remains the most aggressive and optimistic of the management bodies we have met. Backing this, advances and deposits grew 15.0 percent y/y (+3.8 percent q/q) and 6.9 percent y/y (+7.6 percent q/q) respectively. Though there was notable decline in Cost of Funds to 3.7 percent from 3.9 percent in 4Q16 and 5.4 percent in 1Q16, our key worry is erosion of loan WAIR to 12.7 percent from 13.9 percent in 4Q16 and 15.7 percent in 1Q16. In our view, the aggressive strategy will continue to weaken NIM making attainment of the management FY17 target of 9.5 percent a tall order. Notably, the bank was lending more to the corporate sector and shedding from more risky segments. With only a small pool of clients fitting the 14 percent risk pricing, competitive pressure is expected to be a key player in cutting NIM further.
  2. NIR declined 2.2 percent y/y.This was after other income shed 52.3 percent y/y on account of reduced write-backs in 1Q17. FOREX income grew 12.5 percent y/y despite South Sudan’s contribution falling to just 5 percent after historically being a key contributor. Management expects South Sudan business to remain slow in 2017 given hyperinflation and tough operating business environment. NIR to total income stood at 33.6 percent – in line with management’s FY17 target of 34 percent.


About Soko Directory Team

Soko Directory is a Financial and Markets digital portal that tracks brands, listed firms on the NSE, SMEs and trend setters in the markets eco-system. Find us on Facebook: facebook.com/SokoDirectory and on Twitter: twitter.com/SokoDirectory

View other posts by Soko Directory Team


More Articles From This Author







Other Related Articles








SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE

ARCHIVES

2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (220)
  • March 2018 (279)
  • April 2018 (226)
  • May 2018 (240)
  • June 2018 (146)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (195)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (206)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (196)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (236)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (167)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (190)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (246)
  • June 2016 (183)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (250)
  • September 2016 (234)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (154)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (166)
  • April 2015 (109)
  • May 2015 (117)
  • June 2015 (121)
  • July 2015 (150)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (189)
  • October 2015 (171)
  • November 2015 (174)
  • December 2015 (208)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950