Social Media: Kenya’s most feared form of Freedom of Expression

By David Indeje / July 17, 2017




New forms of communication are reshaping the practice of a once narrow minded craft serving a local, regional or national public.

Today, news media use communication technology to gather text, video and images from around the world, with unprecedented speed and varying degrees of editorial control.

The same technology allows news media to disseminate this information to audiences scattered around the globe.  

Based on the above, it was emphasized that content, objectivity and journalistic ethics was important in confronting the new challenges facing media organizations.

Kenyans have not been left out in embracing  new media.

They are using it to hold to account their leaders. The way they use their funds and performance, and systems that lay emphasis on monitoring and reporting.
This is what was envisaged when Kenya promulgated its Constitution in 2010 based on the central pillar of public participation.

This entails the right to information that has remained one of the most fundamental rights world over. This owes largely to the central role it plays in realization of other rights and democratic principles.

The Constitution brought a major boost to the freedom of information campaign with the recognition of the right to information as safeguarded under Article 35 of the Constitution, 2010 and in several statutory legislation key amongst them being under Section 96 of the County Government Act, 2012.

Further, the Constitution of Kenya recognizes that ratified international instruments and conventions as forming part of the law of Kenya. As such, provisions on the right to information provided for in the African Charter on Human and People’s Right and the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights apply in Kenya.

However as Kenya heads to the polls in August,  a section Kenya’s bodies, social media is being seen as a threat to national cohesion with most claiming that hate messages on social media are some of the possible triggers of election-related violence as was witnessed in the run up to 2017 polls.

With the advent of the internet, information exchange has increased exponentially.

Governments on the other hand appear threatened by the robust access to information that is enabled by the internet and seeks to control the flow of such information for several reasons: public order, protection of state leaders and institutions, and protection of state processes and national security.

Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) Director General Francis Wangusi has warned that they will not allow persons propagating hate speech in the cyberspace.

“Currently, we have identified 21 County WhatsApp platforms and we have indicated to their administrators that they have to take action before we deal with them,” he told a stakeholders’ breakfast meeting on elections preparedness in Nairobi.

On the other hand, the National Cohesion and Integration Commission (NCIC) chairman Francis Ole Kaparo through social media, people are spreading false news.

“These proxies are the major source of fake news and to a larger extent, the problem of misinformation and hate speech.”

Kaparo also says, “If it is necessary, they (social media) will be shut out if it is necessary. So that is my stand and I believe that is what ought to be.”

“There are terrible people on social media, there are terrible people on social media most of them writing false information that may bring unnecessary interruption of normal order,” says Kaparo.

However, the CA has assured  they will not shut down the internet on August 8, but emphasised that fake news sites have to be shut down.

In addressing hate speech, ARTICLE 19 proposed policy guidelines outline a six part test to assess potential cases of incitement: 

the context
the speaker, including his her standing in society
intention of the speaker
content of the expression
extent and magnitude of the expression
likelihood, including imminence, of the advocated action occurring

The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet), a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation says CA as a regulator should maintain its independence in making decisions about the internet.

“This can be achieved through transparency in decision making, that is, explaining in explicit terms the legal basis, nature and extent of controls to the internet and communication technologies,” in its policy brief on internet shutdowns and elections in Kenya 2017.

According to KICTANet, the internet is interconnected with many aspects of life in Kenya. “Decisions such as disruption of the internet affects its stability and openness as well as the economy and human rights. such decisions must therefore, be taken collectively and regard to the constitution.”

They recommend that, “Stakeholders that can affect an internet shutdown should allay the public’s fears by committing to keep the internet open. Election observer groups should include openness of the internet as a parameter when analysing and reporting on the freedom and fairness of elections.”



About David Indeje

David Indeje is a writer and editor, with interests on how technology is changing journalism, government, Health, and Gender Development stories are his passion. Follow on Twitter @David_Indeje David can be reached on: (020) 528 0222 / Email: [email protected]

View other posts by David Indeje


More Articles From This Author







Other Related Articles








SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE

ARCHIVES

2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (220)
  • March 2018 (279)
  • April 2018 (226)
  • May 2018 (240)
  • June 2018 (178)
  • July 2018 (179)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (195)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (206)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (196)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (236)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (167)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (190)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (246)
  • June 2016 (183)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (250)
  • September 2016 (234)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (154)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (166)
  • April 2015 (109)
  • May 2015 (117)
  • June 2015 (121)
  • July 2015 (150)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (189)
  • October 2015 (171)
  • November 2015 (174)
  • December 2015 (208)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950