More clarity is required on Kenya’s plastic ban plan

By Soko Directory Team / August 11, 2017




Phyllis Wakiaga, KAM CEO.

The competitiveness and profitability of any business is hugely impacted by changes in market regulations and government policies. It is for this reason that consistency in regulation and predictability of policies is fundamental to the stability of businesses, as changing them would require a shift in daily operations and long-term plans.

Most often than not, if changes in policy are abrupt, businesses tend to incur major costs in making the necessary adjustments and in some cases have to shut down entirely, laying off workers and bearing huge losses. Any such changes made by government that require businesses to comply within a certain period need to be clearly articulated.

That is, new policies need to be concise about the manner in which they will be executed and which authorities are charged with execution. Any vagueness or uncertainty which may lead to businesses not being able to adequately plan for the changes should be avoided. A good case in point is the gazettement of the plastic ban.

The gazette notice which was, in the first place, issued without stakeholder consultation has been vague in its articulation of how the ban will be effected.

The ban, as currently gazetted, is a total ban on all plastic bags including industrial plastic packaging, since it affects plastic carrier bags and flat bags.

Firstly, it is important to point out that this clarity is needed for all manufacturers in order to subsequently make adjustments towards compliance by reorganising their plans and internal operations.

Businesses need to know how to proceed and which of these adjustments will be long-term or short-term and the eventual trajectory of their core businesses. Without this clarification, and barely three weeks to the implementation date, many businesses are in limbo, uncertain on how to proceed towards complying with this new policy.

In actual sense, flat bags are used in packaging of many raw materials including chemical powders, detergents, seedlings, bales of tissue paper, pharmaceutical products, processed foods and fruits, tea, confectionary, flowers and many more products.

A change in this packaging material will have an impact on the overall cost of production and eventually on the price of the final product.

Secondly, while the Ministry of Environmental and Natural Resources and the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) have made public statements to clarify the above, including posting FAQs on the NEMA website to provide answers, these will not serve as a legal document once the ban is effected.

A legal document or re-gazettement of the specific items targeted in the ban will eventually work towards a successful implementation of the policy.

At the port or any point of entry into Kenya, the authorities in charge make reference to an existing gazette notice to grant or deny entry of material and products. Businesses cannot refer the authorities on the ground to the Nema website or a television interview.

A legal document will not only ensure that the policy or regulation is carried out in a just and effective manner but will also protect businesses from unfair treatment and additional taxes. In petitioning the President, therefore, manufacturers are hoping to get clarity on the execution of the ban.

Thirdly, the business community has in many occasions shown willingness to comply and work with the government to institute policies that guarantee a better future for all Kenyans and this is no exception.

The achievement of a clean environment and sanitation for all must be anchored on policies that are sustainable and all-encompassing. Such policies must be anchored on, and strengthened by, adherence to due process. Moreover, for any policy to be effective, it must be supplemented through stakeholder consultation.

Lastly, stability of local businesses cannot be guaranteed with an unpredictable policy and regulatory environment and this poses a threat to the overall economic stability of the country.

The core sectors of this country’s economy stand to be affected by the ambiguity of this ban. They include floriculture and horticultural sector, fish processing, cereal growers, pharmaceuticals, agribusiness, tea industry exports and others.

The formulation of policies and subsequent execution must indeed look at achieving economic progress for the country, but even more importantly, they must guarantee the wellbeing of citizens through provision of solutions that guarantee economic sustainability and inclusivity — a holistic waste management solution would achieve this entirely.

It is, therefore, critical that policies developed are effected with a view that in 20 or 30 years, their goal has not only worked in the short term, but built a foundation for even more progressive policies to be actualised.

—The writer is the CEO Kenya Association of Manufacturers —[email protected] kam.co.ke.



About Soko Directory Team

Soko Directory is a Financial and Markets digital portal that tracks brands, listed firms on the NSE, SMEs and trend setters in the markets eco-system. Find us on Facebook: facebook.com/SokoDirectory and on Twitter: twitter.com/SokoDirectory

View other posts by Soko Directory Team


More Articles From This Author







Other Related Articles








SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE

ARCHIVES

2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (220)
  • March 2018 (279)
  • April 2018 (226)
  • May 2018 (240)
  • June 2018 (178)
  • July 2018 (168)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (195)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (206)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (196)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (236)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (167)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (190)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (246)
  • June 2016 (183)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (250)
  • September 2016 (234)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (154)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (166)
  • April 2015 (109)
  • May 2015 (117)
  • June 2015 (121)
  • July 2015 (150)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (189)
  • October 2015 (171)
  • November 2015 (174)
  • December 2015 (208)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950