When The Rule Of Law Becomes A Tool Of Tyranny By The greedy And Incompetent
KEY POINTS
President Ruto and opposition leader Raila Odinga are no strangers to political manipulation. Both have mastered the art of using state mechanisms to achieve their personal goals. In this case, they have demonstrated that they are willing to sacrifice constitutionalism at the altar of political expediency. Ruto, who once campaigned on a platform of defending the Constitution, now turns a blind eye to its desecration.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Even the devil deserves a fair trial, as the saying goes. If Gachagua is guilty, let him face the full force of the law—but through a transparent, constitutional process. That is the only way to safeguard our democracy. By allowing this farce of an impeachment to stand, we are setting a dangerous precedent where political power supersedes legal and constitutional authority.
The impeachment of Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has shaken the political landscape of Kenya, not because of his character, which most can agree is flawed, but because of the dangerous precedent it sets for the future of governance in this country. Let us be clear: Gachagua is no saint. His corruption, greed, and abuse of power have been well documented. But even a devil deserves his day in court, and that’s where this process has failed us all. It is not about saving Gachagua; it is about saving the integrity of the rule of law, and by extension, the rights of every Kenyan who may one day face the same travesty.
The Constitution of Kenya, under Article 145, outlines the impeachment process of the Deputy President. Yet, what transpired here was a mockery of these provisions. The haste with which the process unfolded, the lack of due process, and the absence of thorough investigations speak to a political witch hunt rather than a legitimate legal process. Article 50 of the Constitution guarantees every individual the right to a fair hearing. Where was Gachagua’s fair hearing? Did the accusations hold water, or were they merely convenient political weapons in the hands of those seeking to consolidate power?
Yes, Gachagua has been accused of corruption, and rightly so, but since when did accusations replace evidence? Kenya has long grappled with corruption, but selectively applying justice to those who fall out of favor with the powers that be is not justice at all. It is political retribution. This is the kind of act that weakens institutions, erodes public trust, and leaves us vulnerable to the whims of those in power. If Gachagua, with all his influence, can be discarded without proper legal recourse, what hope does the common mwananchi have?
President Ruto and opposition leader Raila Odinga are no strangers to political manipulation. Both have mastered the art of using state mechanisms to achieve their personal goals. In this case, they have demonstrated that they are willing to sacrifice constitutionalism at the altar of political expediency. Ruto, who once campaigned on a platform of defending the Constitution, now turns a blind eye to its desecration. Raila, who has long fought against corruption, suddenly finds himself aligning with the very forces that perpetuate it. Is this the democracy we voted for? Or are we simply witnessing the slow erosion of our democratic gains?
The most glaring flaw in this entire process is the lack of independence in the institutions involved. The Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC), the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP), and Parliament itself were all too eager to rubber-stamp Gachagua’s removal without asking the hard questions. Article 160 of the Constitution enshrines the independence of the judiciary, yet how independent was it in this process? Where was the scrutiny of evidence? Where was the rigorous interrogation of facts?
And if we are to speak of corruption, let us not pretend that Gachagua was the only rotten apple in the basket. The political elite in Kenya is a cesspool of corrupt individuals who have mastered the art of using public office for personal gain. Ruto and Raila, too, have skeletons in their closets. Yet, because they are politically expedient at the moment, they are shielded from the very laws they claim to uphold. The double standard is nauseating.
Article 27 of the Constitution provides for equality before the law. Yet, what we are seeing is a two-tiered system: one for the politically connected and another for the rest of us. If Gachagua’s removal was genuinely about corruption, where are the investigations into the billions siphoned off by other politicians? Where is the accountability for the scandals that have rocked the Jubilee and Kenya Kwanza administrations? Selective justice is not justice; it is oppression in disguise.
This sham of an impeachment not only violates Gachagua’s rights but also undermines the constitutional safeguards meant to protect all Kenyans. The Constitution is not a tool to be wielded at the convenience of political leaders. It is the supreme law of the land, designed to ensure that every individual, regardless of their stature, is treated fairly. But when that Constitution is trampled upon, when due process is abandoned, we are all at risk.
For all his faults, Gachagua’s downfall is not the result of a robust legal process but a carefully orchestrated political strategy. Raila and Ruto, in their unholy alliance, have demonstrated that they are willing to bend the rules when it suits them. Today, it’s Gachagua. Tomorrow, it could be anyone who dares to challenge the status quo. Is this the kind of governance we are prepared to accept?
Read Also: 10 Reasons Why Rigathi Gachagua’s Sentiments On Raila Odinga Are Reckless And A Civil War Time Bomb
Even the devil deserves a fair trial, as the saying goes. If Gachagua is guilty, let him face the full force of the law—but through a transparent, constitutional process. That is the only way to safeguard our democracy. By allowing this farce of an impeachment to stand, we are setting a dangerous precedent where political power supersedes legal and constitutional authority. The law is not a plaything for the powerful; it is the last refuge for the weak.
Moreover, this political circus has distracted us from the real issues plaguing the nation: rampant unemployment, rising inflation, a collapsing healthcare system, and widespread poverty. Yet, instead of addressing these pressing concerns, our leaders are busy settling personal scores. Article 43 guarantees every Kenyan the right to economic and social rights, but how can these be realized when the political elite is more concerned with self-preservation than governance?
If this is the kind of leadership we are stuck with, then perhaps it is time for Kenyans to rethink their allegiances. The political class has failed us repeatedly, and now they are dismantling the very legal frameworks that could hold them accountable. What happened to Gachagua is a warning to all of us: today, it’s him, tomorrow, it’s you.
The Kenyan Constitution was designed to protect us from precisely this kind of abuse of power. It is supposed to provide checks and balances, not be a tool for settling political scores. Article 95 gives Parliament the power to hold the executive accountable, yet Parliament itself has become a puppet of the executive. Where is the independence? Where is the oversight?
In conclusion, the impeachment of Gachagua is not just an attack on one man; it is an attack on the rule of law, on constitutionalism, and on the rights of every Kenyan. It is a sham process that will not withstand the rigorous interrogation of corruption, for the very people pushing for it are themselves neck-deep in graft. If we allow this to go unchallenged, we are signing away our freedoms, our rights, and our future. For as the old African proverb says, “When the elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers.”
Read Also: Ruto Picks Kithure Kindiki As Deputy President As Rigathi Remains In Hospital
About Steve Biko Wafula
Steve Biko is the CEO OF Soko Directory and the founder of Hidalgo Group of Companies. Steve is currently developing his career in law, finance, entrepreneurship and digital consultancy; and has been implementing consultancy assignments for client organizations comprising of trainings besides capacity building in entrepreneurial matters. He can be reached on: +254 20 510 1124 or Email: info@sokodirectory.com
- January 2024 (238)
- February 2024 (227)
- March 2024 (190)
- April 2024 (133)
- May 2024 (157)
- June 2024 (145)
- July 2024 (136)
- August 2024 (154)
- September 2024 (212)
- October 2024 (255)
- November 2024 (196)
- December 2024 (42)
- January 2023 (182)
- February 2023 (203)
- March 2023 (322)
- April 2023 (298)
- May 2023 (268)
- June 2023 (214)
- July 2023 (212)
- August 2023 (257)
- September 2023 (237)
- October 2023 (264)
- November 2023 (286)
- December 2023 (177)
- January 2022 (293)
- February 2022 (329)
- March 2022 (358)
- April 2022 (292)
- May 2022 (271)
- June 2022 (232)
- July 2022 (278)
- August 2022 (253)
- September 2022 (246)
- October 2022 (196)
- November 2022 (232)
- December 2022 (167)
- January 2021 (182)
- February 2021 (227)
- March 2021 (325)
- April 2021 (259)
- May 2021 (285)
- June 2021 (272)
- July 2021 (277)
- August 2021 (232)
- September 2021 (271)
- October 2021 (304)
- November 2021 (364)
- December 2021 (249)
- January 2020 (272)
- February 2020 (310)
- March 2020 (390)
- April 2020 (321)
- May 2020 (335)
- June 2020 (327)
- July 2020 (333)
- August 2020 (276)
- September 2020 (214)
- October 2020 (233)
- November 2020 (242)
- December 2020 (187)
- January 2019 (251)
- February 2019 (215)
- March 2019 (283)
- April 2019 (254)
- May 2019 (269)
- June 2019 (249)
- July 2019 (335)
- August 2019 (293)
- September 2019 (306)
- October 2019 (313)
- November 2019 (362)
- December 2019 (318)
- January 2018 (291)
- February 2018 (213)
- March 2018 (275)
- April 2018 (223)
- May 2018 (235)
- June 2018 (176)
- July 2018 (256)
- August 2018 (247)
- September 2018 (255)
- October 2018 (282)
- November 2018 (282)
- December 2018 (184)
- January 2017 (183)
- February 2017 (194)
- March 2017 (207)
- April 2017 (104)
- May 2017 (169)
- June 2017 (205)
- July 2017 (189)
- August 2017 (195)
- September 2017 (186)
- October 2017 (235)
- November 2017 (253)
- December 2017 (266)
- January 2016 (164)
- February 2016 (165)
- March 2016 (189)
- April 2016 (143)
- May 2016 (245)
- June 2016 (182)
- July 2016 (271)
- August 2016 (247)
- September 2016 (233)
- October 2016 (191)
- November 2016 (243)
- December 2016 (153)
- January 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (164)
- April 2015 (107)
- May 2015 (116)
- June 2015 (119)
- July 2015 (145)
- August 2015 (157)
- September 2015 (186)
- October 2015 (169)
- November 2015 (173)
- December 2015 (205)
- March 2014 (2)
- March 2013 (10)
- June 2013 (1)
- March 2012 (7)
- April 2012 (15)
- May 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (2)
- December 2012 (1)