Across the world, internet service providers are experimenting with new ways of offering connectivity that suit changing consumer habits. One of the most interesting trends is the rise of time-based bundles, where customers pay for access within a fixed time window instead of buying data measured in gigabytes. This approach is reshaping how people think about affordability, convenience, and access.
In Kenya, Safaricom pioneered this model with its “Bazu bundles,” where a customer could pay a small fee for unlimited internet for an hour or two. The appeal was simple: instead of worrying about data depletion, users could focus on finishing tasks within the time they had purchased. Airtel followed the same path with its hourly packages, giving budget-conscious consumers more flexibility to choose when and how to connect. Telkom Kenya also offered similar options, targeting users who wanted bursts of connectivity without committing to expensive monthly bundles.
This model is not unique to Kenya. In South Africa, Telkom introduced FreeMe packages that combine time-based browsing and social media access, while MTN has experimented with hourly bundles to cater to casual users. Nigeria has also seen operators such as Airtel Nigeria and Glo Mobile explore daily and hourly options for the mass market, where affordability is critical. These models work well in countries where income levels are unpredictable and consumers prefer short, flexible commitments over expensive long-term data plans.
Globally, time-based internet access is also visible in public Wi-Fi setups. In parts of Asia, including India and the Philippines, customers in cafes, airports, or even rural digital hubs often pay for internet by the hour. In China, shared Wi-Fi hotspots allow users to buy connectivity in 30-minute blocks. This system has made internet access more democratic, especially for those who cannot afford costly monthly subscriptions but still need to go online occasionally for work, study, or social interaction.
What makes time-based bundles so appealing is that they place control back in the hands of consumers. A student preparing for an online exam can buy just two hours of internet at night. A worker in Nairobi can purchase an hour-long bundle during a lunch break to check emails, download documents, or hold a quick meeting. A family that cannot afford unlimited home internet can still connect when it matters most, without breaking the bank.
Critics, however, point out that time-based bundles can encourage rushed usage, with people scrambling to complete tasks before their access expires. They argue that gigabyte-based bundles still offer more predictability, especially for heavy users like businesses, content creators, and developers. Yet for the average consumer in Africa and Asia, where incomes are often inconsistent, time-based bundles remain one of the most practical ways of accessing the internet.
The trend also raises questions about digital inclusion. If designed well, these bundles could help bridge the connectivity gap, ensuring that even low-income communities get a chance to access vital information, education, and job opportunities. But if misused, they could deepen inequalities by creating a two-tier system—one where the rich enjoy unlimited internet while the poor are restricted to short bursts of access.
Still, the flexibility, affordability, and adaptability of time-based bundles make them an innovative solution in the fast-changing digital economy. They mirror the realities of millions of people worldwide who live on daily or hourly budgets and who cannot afford the luxury of monthly subscriptions. As telecom operators continue to adapt, time-based bundles are likely to remain a crucial part of the connectivity landscape, ensuring that internet access is not just for the privileged but also for the everyday hustler, student, and dreamer trying to stay connected in an increasingly digital world.
Read Also: Safaricom Introduces B-LIVE, Redefines How Customers Experience the Internet