A few years ago, we launched what we thought was a near-perfect campaign. The creative was tight, the influencers were aligned, and the rollout had been mapped down to the hour. Then, within a single afternoon, election news broke, and everything we had built disappeared. Not declined. Disappeared.
That moment forced a hard truth. In marketing, you are not just competing with other brands. You are competing with the world. And during an election year, the world gets very loud.
The reality is that the average person is exposed to thousands of brand messages every day. Estimates from Statista suggest that digital ad exposure continues to rise, with users encountering hundreds of ads daily across platforms. When you layer that with an election cycle—breaking news, political discourse, and constant social commentary—attention becomes not just scarce, but fragmented. This is where most brands get it wrong. When the noise increases, the instinct is to push harder. More posts, more ads, more urgency. But attention is not won by volume. In high-noise moments, volume becomes background. Relevance is what cuts through.
Election seasons fundamentally change how people behave online. Engagement patterns shift, content preferences evolve, and platforms prioritise what keeps people scrolling. During politically charged periods, that tends to be news, opinion, and conversation. Research from the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism shows that news consumption spikes significantly during election cycles, with audiences spending more time engaging with political content than brand messaging. For marketers, this means one thing. You are no longer the main event. And that is not necessarily a problem—if you are willing to adjust.
The brands that struggle are often the ones that insist on inserting themselves into conversations that are not theirs to have. The ones that perform better understand when to speak, and just as importantly, when to step back. There is a version of marketing that thrives on trends—jumping on viral moments, replicating formats, and chasing relevance in real time. It can work occasionally, but audiences are becoming sharper. They can tell when a brand is participating in culture and when it is simply borrowing it. During an election year, this distinction becomes even more obvious. When people are having serious conversations about leadership, the economy, and their future, the last thing they want is a brand awkwardly inserting itself with a recycled meme. The brands that hold their ground are the ones that understand their role. They do not abandon their voice to chase the moment. They refine it.
One of the most underrated advantages in marketing today is consistency. Not consistency in posting, but consistency in identity. Across the markets we work in—Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Ethiopia, and South Africa—the brands that maintain engagement during election cycles are not the loudest. They are the most familiar. They show up the same way, speak the same language, and deliver the same kind of value over time. This matters because in moments of uncertainty, people gravitate towards what feels stable. If your brand has only ever shown up during campaigns, you will disappear when the noise rises. But if you have built a presence, if people already know what to expect from you, you do not have to fight for attention. You have already earned a place in it.
There is also a broader shift happening in marketing today, one that becomes even more visible during election periods. The move from audiences to communities is reshaping how brands communicate. An audience consumes content. A community participates in it. This difference is not just semantic. It is structural. When public conversation is dominated by politics, people still find their way back to spaces where they feel entertained, informed, or connected. These spaces are not built through campaigns. They are built through relationships. Brands that invest in community—through consistent interaction, meaningful content, and shared experiences—become far more resilient to external noise. They are not interrupting the conversation. They are part of it.
At the same time, the African consumer is changing in ways that brands can no longer ignore. Digital adoption has accelerated significantly over the past decade, and data from DataReportal shows continued growth in internet and social media usage across the continent. More importantly, users are no longer passive. They are creators, commentators, and critics. Brand messaging is no longer one-directional. It is interpreted, challenged, and sometimes reshaped in real time. During an election year, when emotions and opinions are already heightened, this shift becomes even more pronounced. It requires brands to be far more intentional about how they show up, not just in what they say, but in how they say it.
Technology continues to transform marketing at an incredible pace. Artificial intelligence is accelerating content production, automation is streamlining execution, and data is making targeting more precise than ever before. But there is an interesting paradox emerging. The more content there is, the more people value what feels real. Audiences are increasingly skilled at recognising what is scripted and what is genuine. During election cycles, when trust becomes a central theme across society, this sensitivity only increases. The brands that perform best are the ones that feel human in how they communicate, not like campaigns. They are clear, respectful, and aware of the moment they are operating in.
If there is one thing election seasons make clear, it is that relevance is contextual. Sometimes the right move is to continue as planned. Sometimes it is to adapt. And sometimes, it is to pause altogether. But the decision should never be accidental. It should always be intentional. Because when the noise eventually fades, as it always does, people remember the brands that showed up with clarity, not just presence.
In marketing, just like in conversation, the voices that matter most are rarely the loudest. They are the ones who understand the room.
Read Also: 2024 In The Picture: Geopolitics, Elections, And Forex Liquidity To Dominate