55% of Crypto Firms Plan to Increase Identity Verification Budget, Report

By Soko Directory Team / Published June 30, 2022 | 10:04 am




KEY POINTS

Data from the 200 globally surveyed companies indicated that 55 percent of businesses spend between $1,000 and $10,000 on verification budgets. More than 20 percent of the surveyed companies spend between $10,000 to $100,000, while 6 percent spend over $100,000 monthly.


crypto companies

KEY TAKEAWAYS


Almost 80 percent of the surveyed businesses plan to enter new markets or acquire new licenses within the next 12 months. This underscores the demand for adequate user verification and AML compliance.


Fraud prevention remains a key challenge for the crypto industry, and a new report by Sumsub indicates that more than half of crypto companies (55 percent) plan to increase their budget for verification.

The report is the first-ever to highlight verification practices, regulatory compliance, and the future of identity verification among crypto businesses.

One of the key findings from the report indicated that in identity verification practices, nearly 80 percent of crypto businesses use automated KYC solutions.

KYC or Know Your Customer refers to the mandatory process of identifying and verifying the client’s identity when opening an account and periodically over time.

Data from the 200 globally surveyed companies indicated that 55 percent of businesses spend between $1,000 and $10,000 on verification budgets. More than 20 percent of the surveyed companies spend between $10,000 to $100,000, while 6 percent spend over $100,000 monthly.

The remaining 18 percent spend less than $1000 a month. Notably, more than half of respondents (55 percent) plan to increase their budget for verification.

Users getting verified on these crypto platforms are younger audiences (average 30 years), unlike in 2021, when the average age was 33. And although the gender ratio varies across countries, 80 percent of those verified are men.

Since crypto businesses are required to perform identity verification by law, it is unsurprising that 55 percent of the surveyed companies noted that staying compliant with AML regulations is their main verification goal.

While using identity verification solutions, 26 percent of businesses indicated building trust in users and partners as a key goal. In comparison, 17 percent of those surveyed stated fraud protection as a primary goal.

ALSO READ: The Hunger Menace In East Africa; Case Study Of Kenya

The findings also indicated that 47 percent of crypto businesses employing automated verification feel they have strong fraud detection. Only 31 percent of those who manually check their users feel the same way.

Accordingly, 15 percent of businesses using manual verification feel they have low fraud protection, while just 4 percent of automated solutions adopters feel the same.

In the first quarter of 2021, the most commonly forged documents were from Kenya, Cameroon and Iraq.

Most of these forgery attempts were on ID cards and driver’s licenses issued in Vietnam, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. The USA and Canada were also among the top ten countries for forgery attempts.

While these companies are hoping to tame such challenges, they are torn between using automated or manual verification solutions.

The challenges with automated solutions are false applicant rejections and approval rates—whereas, for manual solutions, it’s long verification time, human error, and difficulty entering new markets.

Working in a constantly shifting regulatory landscape is another big challenge. That’s why crypto businesses need to start building their compliance infrastructure ahead of time, considering possible regulatory changes in the near future.

In the report, Sumsub’s experts offer actionable solutions for staying ahead of the game in the crypto world.

Sumsub’s anti-fraud team noticed a growing number of fraudsters using deepfakes and 3D projections to bypass verification due to increasingly sophisticated—and available—fraud tools.

Thankfully, AI-based facial biometric solutions such as liveness and face match can fight back against these attacks.

While examining practical ways to balance AML compliance and user pass rates, Sumsub found that automating verification is the first and most evident step.

This allows businesses to achieve an average verification time of 50 seconds, spending 70 percent less time on compliance tasks while reducing costs by 40 percent.

Other measures might include tailoring verification flows to different customer segments based on risk profiles and splitting the onboarding process into several steps, or “levels”.

When appropriately applied, level-based identity verification significantly reduces drop-offs during onboarding and ensures strong fraud protection.

In the meantime, almost 80 percent of the surveyed businesses plan to enter new markets or acquire new licenses within the next 12 months. This underscores the demand for adequate user verification and AML compliance.

You can download the whole report through this link: https://sumsub.com/crypto-report/.




About Soko Directory Team

Soko Directory is a Financial and Markets digital portal that tracks brands, listed firms on the NSE, SMEs and trend setters in the markets eco-system.Find us on Facebook: facebook.com/SokoDirectory and on Twitter: twitter.com/SokoDirectory

View other posts by Soko Directory Team


More Articles From This Author








Trending Stories










Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE



ARCHIVES

2023
  • January 2023 (182)
  • February 2023 (203)
  • March 2023 (322)
  • April 2023 (298)
  • May 2023 (268)
  • June 2023 (214)
  • July 2023 (213)
  • August 2023 (258)
  • September 2023 (174)
  • 2022
  • January 2022 (293)
  • February 2022 (329)
  • March 2022 (358)
  • April 2022 (292)
  • May 2022 (271)
  • June 2022 (232)
  • July 2022 (278)
  • August 2022 (253)
  • September 2022 (246)
  • October 2022 (196)
  • November 2022 (233)
  • December 2022 (167)
  • 2021
  • January 2021 (182)
  • February 2021 (227)
  • March 2021 (325)
  • April 2021 (259)
  • May 2021 (285)
  • June 2021 (272)
  • July 2021 (277)
  • August 2021 (232)
  • September 2021 (271)
  • October 2021 (305)
  • November 2021 (364)
  • December 2021 (249)
  • 2020
  • January 2020 (272)
  • February 2020 (310)
  • March 2020 (390)
  • April 2020 (321)
  • May 2020 (335)
  • June 2020 (327)
  • July 2020 (333)
  • August 2020 (276)
  • September 2020 (214)
  • October 2020 (233)
  • November 2020 (242)
  • December 2020 (187)
  • 2019
  • January 2019 (251)
  • February 2019 (215)
  • March 2019 (283)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (269)
  • June 2019 (249)
  • July 2019 (335)
  • August 2019 (293)
  • September 2019 (306)
  • October 2019 (313)
  • November 2019 (362)
  • December 2019 (318)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (213)
  • March 2018 (275)
  • April 2018 (223)
  • May 2018 (235)
  • June 2018 (176)
  • July 2018 (256)
  • August 2018 (247)
  • September 2018 (255)
  • October 2018 (282)
  • November 2018 (282)
  • December 2018 (184)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (194)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (205)
  • July 2017 (189)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (164)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (189)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (245)
  • June 2016 (182)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (247)
  • September 2016 (233)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (164)
  • April 2015 (107)
  • May 2015 (116)
  • June 2015 (119)
  • July 2015 (145)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (186)
  • October 2015 (169)
  • November 2015 (173)
  • December 2015 (205)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950