Moody’s Affirms East African Development Bank’s Baa3 Rating

By Soko Directory Team / Published October 2, 2023 | 5:35 pm



Economy

Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) has affirmed the East African Development Bank’s (EADB) Baa3 long-term issuer rating and maintained a stable outlook.

The rating affirmation reflects the EADB’s strong capital position, offset by low development asset credit quality and a legacy of high non-performing assets (NPAs).

Liquidity and funding benefit from relatively robust liquidity levels but are marked by a less diverse funding structure than many rating peers.

Moody’s assessment of the strength of member support balances a large cushion of callable capital with the limited ability of shareholders to provide support given the low ratings of the EADB’s four main shareholders – Kenya (B3 negative), Rwanda (B2 stable), Tanzania (B2 positive), and Uganda (B2 negative).

The stable outlook reflects a balance of upside and downside risks. Notwithstanding the risks associated with a challenging operating environment and the elevated concentration of the EADB’s portfolio, the potential for capital erosion is mitigated by the Bank’s currently very low leverage ratio and cautious approach to new lending.

Moody’s assumes that the bank will continue to develop its risk management framework, which is not as advanced as other rated peers, while maintaining robust capital adequacy, and prudent liquidity levels.

RATING RATIONALE

A STRONG CAPITAL POSITION ACTS AS A KEY MITIGANT FOR LOW-ASSET QUALITY

EADB’s leverage ratio stood at 102% in 2022, having fallen from 126% in 2017. The Bank’s ratio is one of the lowest among the multilateral development banks (MDBs) that Moody’s rates and remains significantly below several rating peers, including the Trade and Development Bank’s (TDB, Baa3 stable) and the West African Development Bank (BOAD, Baa1 negative).

Limited growth in development assets, the continuing completion of capital subscriptions by shareholders, and a modest but consistent contribution from retained earnings to the capital base have driven the steady decline in the leverage ratio.

EADB’s strong capital position acts as a key mitigant for its low development asset credit quality. EADB has the mandate to build its portfolio within its four member states, which leads to the unavoidable geographic concentration of the loan portfolio.

Concentration risk is manifest in other ways, with the 10 largest exposures accounting for 84% of the development-related assets portfolio on a gross basis at the end of 2022. However, the concentration risk is somewhat overestimated by these indicators as some of EADB’s loans are on-lent by financial institutions to their clients.

The NPA ratio stood at 3.8% in 2022, consisting of a single loan. The stock of NPAs has remained more contained in recent years after reaching 8.7% of development-related assets in 2018, notwithstanding the twin shocks to the region caused by the pandemic and the global implications of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

However, given EADB’s track record of sudden spikes in NPAs and fluctuations in the nonperforming portfolio, Moody’s expects asset performance to remain a constraint on EADB’s credit profile.

LIQUIDITY IS SUPPORTED BY PRUDENT LIQUID ASSET LEVELS, ALTHOUGH FUNDING REMAINS DRAWN

FROM A SMALL INVESTOR BASE

Prudent liquid asset levels and long-dated borrowings support the EADB’s liquidity. Based on end-2022 figures, the Bank’s availability of liquid resources (ALR) ratio stood around 107%, indicating that liquid resources would be sufficient to more than cover net cash outflows over 18 months.

EADB has a liquidity policy that sets a minimum liquidity coverage ratio of 1.33x total liabilities (i.e. covering liabilities for the next 16 months). At the end of 2022, the Bank’s operating level of liquidity was well above its minimum requirement at 8.1x, up from 5.8x in 2021, although a normalization is likely as loan disbursements and other designated liabilities gain pace over the coming years under a new medium-term strategic plan.

The Bank’s main sources of financing are concentrated in lines of credit from MDBs, which provide a stable and cheap source of financing, and regional financial institutions. The main lending institutions for long-term financing as of end-2022 include the OPEC Fund for International Development (OFID), Arab Bank for Economic Development in Africa (BADEA, Aa2 positive), Kreditanstalt fuer Wiederaufbau (KfW, Aaa stable), and NCBA Bank Kenya Plc.

However, Moody’s assesses EADB’s funding position as relatively weak, reflecting a difference between the Bank and some of its peers that can rely on a much larger and more diversified investor base.

SHAREHOLDERS HAVE LOW ABILITY TO PROVIDE SUPPORT, LIMITING UPLIFT FROM LARGE CALLABLE CAPITAL BUFFER

Moody considers the ability of ADB’s shareholders to support the Bank to be limited, based on their “B2” weighted average shareholder rating, among the lowest across rated MDBs. Commensurate with such a rating, Moody’s assessment of the ability of the EADB’s main shareholders to quickly transfer callable capital to the Bank in the event of an emergency is low.

A shared exposure to systemic risks between shareholders and borrowers – as EADB’s loan portfolio is located entirely within the same geographic region as its member states – also acts as a constraint.

EADB has a large cushion of callable capital, which stood at almost 1000% of total debt in 2022. However, past delays in the payment of capital contributions suggest that shareholders have limited capacity that constrains willingness to support, although progress has been made on the completion of outstanding subscriptions.

Moreover, if only taking into account the share of callable capital from investment-grade shareholders, for which Moody’s has a high level of confidence a capital call would be paid on time, the coverage ratio decreases to 1.5%.

RATIONALE FOR THE STABLE OUTLOOK

The stable outlook reflects a balance of upside and downside risks. Notwithstanding the risks associated with a challenging operating environment and the elevated concentration of the EADB’s portfolio, the potential for capital erosion is mitigated by the Bank’s low leverage ratio and cautious approach to new lending.

Although Moody’s expects loan portfolio growth to gradually accelerate under the impulse of a new medium-term strategic plan, leverage will remain relatively low as the Bank continues to proceed prudently toward new loan disbursements.

Moody’s assumes that the Bank will continue to develop its risk management framework, which is not as advanced as other rated peers, while maintaining robust capital adequacy, and prudent liquidity levels.




About Soko Directory Team

Soko Directory is a Financial and Markets digital portal that tracks brands, listed firms on the NSE, SMEs and trend setters in the markets eco-system.Find us on Facebook: facebook.com/SokoDirectory and on Twitter: twitter.com/SokoDirectory

View other posts by Soko Directory Team


More Articles From This Author








Trending Stories










Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE



ARCHIVES

2023
  • January 2023 (182)
  • February 2023 (203)
  • March 2023 (322)
  • April 2023 (298)
  • May 2023 (268)
  • June 2023 (214)
  • July 2023 (212)
  • August 2023 (257)
  • September 2023 (237)
  • October 2023 (266)
  • November 2023 (282)
  • December 2023 (80)
  • 2022
  • January 2022 (293)
  • February 2022 (329)
  • March 2022 (358)
  • April 2022 (292)
  • May 2022 (271)
  • June 2022 (232)
  • July 2022 (278)
  • August 2022 (253)
  • September 2022 (246)
  • October 2022 (196)
  • November 2022 (232)
  • December 2022 (167)
  • 2021
  • January 2021 (182)
  • February 2021 (227)
  • March 2021 (325)
  • April 2021 (259)
  • May 2021 (285)
  • June 2021 (272)
  • July 2021 (277)
  • August 2021 (232)
  • September 2021 (271)
  • October 2021 (305)
  • November 2021 (364)
  • December 2021 (249)
  • 2020
  • January 2020 (272)
  • February 2020 (310)
  • March 2020 (390)
  • April 2020 (321)
  • May 2020 (335)
  • June 2020 (327)
  • July 2020 (333)
  • August 2020 (276)
  • September 2020 (214)
  • October 2020 (233)
  • November 2020 (242)
  • December 2020 (187)
  • 2019
  • January 2019 (251)
  • February 2019 (215)
  • March 2019 (283)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (269)
  • June 2019 (249)
  • July 2019 (335)
  • August 2019 (293)
  • September 2019 (306)
  • October 2019 (313)
  • November 2019 (362)
  • December 2019 (318)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (213)
  • March 2018 (275)
  • April 2018 (223)
  • May 2018 (235)
  • June 2018 (176)
  • July 2018 (256)
  • August 2018 (247)
  • September 2018 (255)
  • October 2018 (282)
  • November 2018 (282)
  • December 2018 (184)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (194)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (205)
  • July 2017 (189)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (164)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (189)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (245)
  • June 2016 (182)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (247)
  • September 2016 (233)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (164)
  • April 2015 (107)
  • May 2015 (116)
  • June 2015 (119)
  • July 2015 (145)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (186)
  • October 2015 (169)
  • November 2015 (173)
  • December 2015 (205)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950