Western Kenya’s Incumbency Curse: Why Recycling Politicians Has Condemned a Vibrant Region to Stagnation

For more than three decades, Western Kenya has become a museum of political nostalgia. The data from Stats Kenya’s Re-election Index (1988–2022) paints an unflattering picture: Bungoma (0.384), Busia (0.417), Kakamega (0.360), Vihiga (0.431), and Trans-Nzoia (0.360). These figures mean that the region consistently rewards the same names election after election—faces that long ago stopped representing the future. It’s a cycle of comfort masquerading as loyalty. What should be a democracy of ideas has morphed into a dynasty of memories, where voters cling to the devils they know, even when those devils have built nothing new.

This addiction to political recycling has trapped Western Kenya in an endless loop of mediocrity. Instead of demanding results, citizens have normalized excuses. Every election, the same speeches return, the same promises reappear, the same faces smile on new posters—and the same poverty persists. It is no accident that while other regions are redesigning their economies around technology, manufacturing, and logistics, Western Kenya is still debating access to clean water, feeder roads, and market sheds. When power never changes hands, neither does the script.

The problem is not only who sits in the office but the economic architecture that grows around them. Long-tenured politicians breed long-tenured cartels. Contractors who “understand the system” become permanent fixtures; suppliers who financed past campaigns become gatekeepers; tenders circulate among loyalists. The result is a suffocating patronage web where political survival, not public welfare, dictates spending. You can’t expect innovation from a leadership class still living off projects commissioned when cassette tapes were fashionable.

Development is not an act of charity—it is a function of disruption. Regions that prosper rotate leadership, forcing accountability and injecting new thinking. In Western Kenya, the opposite prevails: fear of uncertainty. Leaders who have overstayed their relevance thrive on nostalgia and divide communities along sub-ethnic lines to secure survival. They weaponize funerals, weaponize religion, weaponize victimhood. The voter becomes emotionally blackmailed into believing that replacing them would dishonor the ancestors. That superstition has cost the region entire generations of opportunity.

Read Also: Recycled Old Leadership: The Roadblock To Western Kenya’s Progress

The youth, who should be the region’s economic engine, have been conscripted into political logistics instead. Instead of building startups, they build campaign convoys. Instead of managing e-commerce stores, they manage rallies. The most creative minds are trapped in the business of applause—paid to cheer rather than to innovate. A region where nearly 70 percent of the population is under 35 cannot progress while its brightest energy is consumed by sustaining the careers of men and women whose best ideas belong to the 1990s.

This political inertia explains why Western Kenya’s agricultural revolution never materialized. Sugar mills collapsed as politicians staged committee tours; dairy cooperatives died in audit smoke; and the region that once fed a nation now imports even animal feed. Every time a new crop or industrial policy arises, the political class clings to sugar because it is familiar, manipulable, and nostalgic. Innovation dies where incumbency reigns.

Persistent incumbency also kills accountability. A new leader’s first instinct is to audit the last one. That audit—however imperfect—forces the truth into daylight. Without leadership change, every audit becomes a courtesy call, every oversight meeting a ritual. Committees meet, minutes are approved, and nothing changes. In this comfort zone, corruption matures quietly, protected by routine and recycled loyalty.

Western Kenya’s tragedy is moral as much as it is economic. Loyalty has become laziness. People say, “He is one of us,” instead of “He has delivered for us.” A leader who fails to deliver roads, jobs, or healthcare is defended because he attends funerals and funds football tournaments. Yet no region ever developed through condolence books and cash handouts. Development is data, discipline, and disruption. Anything else is noise.

The time has come for Western voters to measure their leaders not by tribe, not by surname, not by how long they’ve served, but by how much measurable progress they have delivered. Compare your county’s roads to those in Nyeri, your hospital staffing to that in Kericho, your small-enterprise credit to that in Nakuru. If you can’t find parity, ask yourself why. The answer will not come from Nairobi—it lies in your ballot history.

This call is not about punishing individuals; it is about liberating a region. True progress demands periodic change. It’s how institutions renew, how budgets reset, how corrupt networks crumble. When leadership turnover becomes taboo, stagnation becomes tradition. Western Kenya deserves better than tradition—it deserves transformation.

So let the next election be a referendum on results, not rhetoric. Let new voices rise—not because they are young or loud, but because they are untainted. Let civic organizations publish scorecards; let journalists expose every incomplete project; let citizens refuse to be bought with branded t-shirts and funerals. The only antidote to permanent under-development is political renewal driven by citizens who have finally said, “Enough.”

Western Kenya can either continue polishing the same old crowns of incompetence or forge a new generation of builders. The data is clear; the history is cruel. The region’s future now rests on its courage to break its own spell.

Read Also: Youth In Western Kenya Start Training Under NYOTA