Ban on Logging Will Affect Tea Production, Traders say

By Isaac Korir / March 13, 2018




Tea merchant has panned the government move to ban logging saying it will affect production, which largely depends on firewood.

According to traders at Mombasa Tea Auction, 70 percent of tea production process relies on wood as fuel. Edward Mudibo, the East African Tea Trade Association (EATTA) managing director stated that the ban should be lifted from tea factories.

“Firewood is necessary for drying tea. The ban on logging is unfortunate particularly now when the prices of tea have stagnated,” he said.

DP William Ruto issued a ban on logging for a period of three months aimed at stopping the rampant destruction of forests and the near depletion of natural ecosystems. He issued a directive to the Environment CS, Keriako Tobiko to form a task force that will propose ways to discourage the destruction of forests.

Mr. Mudibo further stated that the tea industry is in the forefront of forest conservation activities. He says the industry propagates tree seedlings for trees like eucalyptus, which are it releases to the local communities for planting exotic trees used as wood fuel and indigenous trees for conservation.

Majority of the tea companies is dependent on own forest plantations that cater to the energy for processing. Some have partnerships with key environment development agencies.

“The blanket ban shall have adverse effects on the tea industry, Kenya’s leading foreign exchange earner and major employer and this has to be protected. Unless tea producers are exempted from the ban, the industry will have to close as the business model would not be able to sustain the costs,” he added.

Tea is the largest foreign exchange earner in Kenya after remittances. It contributed over 114 billion shillings in 2013, 101 billion shillings in 2014, 124 billion shillings in 2015, 120.6 billion shillings in 2016 and 129 billion shillings in 2017.





More Articles From This Author








Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE

ARCHIVES

2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (220)
  • March 2018 (279)
  • April 2018 (226)
  • May 2018 (240)
  • June 2018 (178)
  • July 2018 (257)
  • August 2018 (250)
  • September 2018 (213)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (195)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (206)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (196)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (236)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (167)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (190)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (246)
  • June 2016 (183)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (250)
  • September 2016 (234)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (154)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (166)
  • April 2015 (109)
  • May 2015 (117)
  • June 2015 (121)
  • July 2015 (150)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (189)
  • October 2015 (171)
  • November 2015 (174)
  • December 2015 (208)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950