ECP Paid 4 Million Dollars In Bribes To Officials In Uganda

For three months now, we have been giving you a chronological set of events of how the giant construction company, Spencon, was brought down, courtesy of Emerging Capital Partners (ECP).
In a series of verifiable posts, we managed to unearth a deep dark scheme hatched by officials in ECP to loot and bring down Spencon, a company that was a giant in the construction sector in more than nine East African Countries.
In our unearthing, we only centered on how ECP brought down Spencon and how the Kenyan business has been affected. We also outlined the suffering of thousands of employees who were left without jobs when Spencon went down.
READ: ECP: Be On The Lookout For Conmen Masquerading As Investors
We have now evidence that ECP did not just carry out its criminal activities in Kenya alone but virtually in all the countries that Spencon had roots in. Documents within our hands show that Spencon capitalized on paying bribes in Uganda to Ugandan officials in order to be given favors during the award of tenders.
Before Taking You To Uganda
Before taking you to Uganda, let me just remind you that in 2006, ECP, through ECP Africa, invested approximately 15 million dollars in Spencon in the form of a convertible note. In 2009, ECP converted note to an equity interest of 38 percent in Spencon. The remaining shares were held by the sponsors of Spencon.
Spencon was a civil engineering and construction company established in 1979 that specializes in water supply & sewage systems, civil works including roads, bridges and buildings, and power and transmission lines. It was the leading indigenous construction company in East Africa, having completed over 200 major projects in the last decade for clients such as the World Bank, European Investment Bank, and the African Development Bank.
Trouble started in mid-2011 when ECP through their hired consultants, Andrew Ross and Steven Haswell conspired to wrestle control of the company from its founders by manipulating the findings of the internal audit reports with the sole aim of forcefully acquiring all of the company’s shares to “flip” the company at a huge profit. ECP seized full control of Spencon by illegally transferring 60 percent of the sponsors’ shares to itself.
Unknown to Spencon, ECP was in secret negotiations with, amongst others, one UAE based competitor who had expressed interest in acquiring the company.
ECP had offered to sell 100 percent of the company’s shares. Fortunately, this did not go through as the remaining Spencon founders blocked it through a court order. Had this greedy plan gone through, ECP would have yielded a 200 percent + profit – the case is still in court.
READ: Con Investors Use Dubious Means To Want To Take Over Spencon
Back To Uganda
According to the documents we have, ECP has engaged in a systematic violation of all rules and regulations that govern the doing of business in most of the East African Countries and used Spencon as a conduit to carry out their dirty work.
We have evidence that bribes have been paid to government officials in Uganda, with a strong likelihood of similar payments in other countries such as Kenya, Tanzania, Sudan, and Rwanda. Most of the bribes by ECP were paid between the years 2014 and 2015.
It is estimated that in the year 2014 alone, more than two million dollars in bribes were paid in Uganda with a similar amount being made in the year 2015.
For years, even though bribery was customary in the East African Region and was often required by officials, the custom was condemned in Spencon. Former employees we interviewed said before the coming of ECP, Spencon would rather lose a tender than pay a bribe to a government official.
When they took control of Spencon, ECP not only re-introduced the practice but made bribe payments of unprecedented amounts without giving a damn of the consequences or how that would paint them.
It is estimated that since taking over Spencon, ECP paid bribes amounting to 30 percent of all monies received from the projects done in Uganda.
READ: Africa Eye by BBC Unearths the Reason behind Spencon’s Bankruptcy
When Spencon Died
When Spencon died, there are people who lost more than the owners of the company. There are people whose lives have never been the same since the collapse of Spencon. We never talk about these people because they are always suffering in silence. These are the FORMER EMPLOYEES.
There are people who used to work with Spencon who ran mad when their source of livelihood was destroyed by ECP. Some died of depression, high blood pressure, and heart attack from the news they received. Families were broken, kids dropped out of school. It simply became messy, noisy with casualties.
About Soko Directory Team
Soko Directory is a Financial and Markets digital portal that tracks brands, listed firms on the NSE, SMEs and trend setters in the markets eco-system.Find us on Facebook: facebook.com/SokoDirectory and on Twitter: twitter.com/SokoDirectory
- January 2026 (220)
- February 2026 (246)
- March 2026 (286)
- April 2026 (83)
- January 2025 (119)
- February 2025 (191)
- March 2025 (212)
- April 2025 (193)
- May 2025 (161)
- June 2025 (157)
- July 2025 (227)
- August 2025 (211)
- September 2025 (270)
- October 2025 (297)
- November 2025 (230)
- December 2025 (219)
- January 2024 (238)
- February 2024 (227)
- March 2024 (190)
- April 2024 (133)
- May 2024 (157)
- June 2024 (145)
- July 2024 (136)
- August 2024 (154)
- September 2024 (212)
- October 2024 (255)
- November 2024 (196)
- December 2024 (143)
- January 2023 (182)
- February 2023 (203)
- March 2023 (322)
- April 2023 (297)
- May 2023 (267)
- June 2023 (214)
- July 2023 (212)
- August 2023 (257)
- September 2023 (237)
- October 2023 (264)
- November 2023 (286)
- December 2023 (177)
- January 2022 (293)
- February 2022 (329)
- March 2022 (358)
- April 2022 (292)
- May 2022 (271)
- June 2022 (232)
- July 2022 (278)
- August 2022 (253)
- September 2022 (246)
- October 2022 (196)
- November 2022 (232)
- December 2022 (167)
- January 2021 (182)
- February 2021 (227)
- March 2021 (325)
- April 2021 (259)
- May 2021 (285)
- June 2021 (272)
- July 2021 (277)
- August 2021 (232)
- September 2021 (271)
- October 2021 (304)
- November 2021 (364)
- December 2021 (249)
- January 2020 (272)
- February 2020 (310)
- March 2020 (390)
- April 2020 (321)
- May 2020 (335)
- June 2020 (327)
- July 2020 (333)
- August 2020 (276)
- September 2020 (214)
- October 2020 (233)
- November 2020 (242)
- December 2020 (187)
- January 2019 (251)
- February 2019 (215)
- March 2019 (283)
- April 2019 (254)
- May 2019 (269)
- June 2019 (249)
- July 2019 (335)
- August 2019 (293)
- September 2019 (306)
- October 2019 (313)
- November 2019 (362)
- December 2019 (318)
- January 2018 (291)
- February 2018 (213)
- March 2018 (275)
- April 2018 (223)
- May 2018 (235)
- June 2018 (176)
- July 2018 (256)
- August 2018 (247)
- September 2018 (255)
- October 2018 (282)
- November 2018 (282)
- December 2018 (184)
- January 2017 (183)
- February 2017 (194)
- March 2017 (207)
- April 2017 (104)
- May 2017 (169)
- June 2017 (205)
- July 2017 (189)
- August 2017 (195)
- September 2017 (186)
- October 2017 (235)
- November 2017 (253)
- December 2017 (266)
- January 2016 (164)
- February 2016 (165)
- March 2016 (189)
- April 2016 (143)
- May 2016 (245)
- June 2016 (182)
- July 2016 (271)
- August 2016 (247)
- September 2016 (233)
- October 2016 (191)
- November 2016 (243)
- December 2016 (153)
- January 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (164)
- April 2015 (107)
- May 2015 (116)
- June 2015 (119)
- July 2015 (145)
- August 2015 (157)
- September 2015 (186)
- October 2015 (169)
- November 2015 (173)
- December 2015 (205)
- March 2014 (2)
- March 2013 (10)
- June 2013 (1)
- March 2012 (7)
- April 2012 (15)
- May 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (2)
- December 2012 (1)
