The Different Structures You Need To Consider Before Getting Into A Joint Venture

By Cytonn Investments / October 7, 2020 | 2:40 pm



daily interest investment

A Joint Venture (JV) is an agreement between two or more parties who contractually agree to co-operate in order to achieve common goals or objectives for a period of time.

Most joint venture agreements involve a party contributing capital and an operating member. The capital member contributes land or finances while the operating member, usually an expert in real estate, provides the necessary skills and is responsible for daily operations and management.

The structure of a joint venture should address the following issues; distribution of profits, capital contribution, liability, taxation, flexibility, Non-Disclosure Agreement, and the exit mechanism.

There are four major categories of joint ventures;

  1. Contractual Development Agreement

A contractual development agreement provides a quick and flexible option to launch a joint venture without having to form a company. It is formed when two or more companies get into a contract for the purpose of carrying out a development project.

Distribution of profits is defined and each party is taxed separately on their share of profits from the venture and is not liable for the debts of the other parties unless there’s a contract in place with third parties. A contractual development agreement allows the parties to retain ownership of their assets which is a major advantage.

The disadvantage of a contractual development agreement is that there is a risk of forming a partnership which will lead to increased liability and difficulty raising finances since there is no separate legal entity formed. Additionally, a contractual development agreement cannot own any assets.

  1. Corporation

This structure occurs when the joint venture is created in the form of a corporation. The corporation is owned by shareholders and is managed by a board of directors. A separate business entity is thus formed which enables it to own assets and makes it easier to raise finances. The liability of each contributing partner is limited to the amount invested. The demerit of this structure is that corporations suffer double taxation as both the corporation’s profits and shareholders’ dividends are taxed separately.

  1. Private Limited Company

This kind of venture can also be referred to as a JV company or a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV). In this structure, the parties involved become shareholders of a private limited company which is a separate entity. Liability is limited to the amount each company has contributed. Share rights and revenues are distributed based on the level of investment and involvement. The company can own assets and the structure is flexible enough to allow for an exit strategy where a partner can sell assets or sell their shares to a new investor.

The downside of a private limited company is that although it is ideal in theory, its practicality can be undermined by administration costs and company obligations such as reporting and compliance measures. There’s also double taxation both at the company level, 25% corporation tax, and at an individual joint partner level, an additional 25%.

  1. Partnership

Partnerships can be divided into limited liability partnerships and unlimited liability partnerships. An Unlimited Liability partnership is a flexible setup where the joint venture is governed by the partnership agreement drawn up by the partners and is not restrained by rigid requirements. The joint venture partners are taxed directly and it has the advantage that the profits are not taxable. This structure also allows for a significant level of confidentiality which may be a requirement for the parties involved. A confidentiality agreement or a non-disclosure agreement could be signed at the commencement of the joint venture. This helps protect insider information shared during the venture from being used against the parties. On the flip side, each party has unlimited liability. This means that in case the venture fails to meet its financial obligations, the partners’ personal assets could be claimed to settle outstanding debts. Another drawback is that similar to a contractual development agreement, there could be difficulty raising finances since there is no legal entity formed. Additionally, if any of the joint venture partners leave, a whole new partnership is required.

A Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) can be thought of as a hybrid between a partnership and a company. An LLP leads to the creation of a separate entity with limited liability and the benefit of ease of accessing finance. From a tax perspective, however, it is treated as a partnership, meaning the partners are taxed directly on their share of profits which is a major benefit. The caveat of this structure is that it has a greater bureaucracy requirement for administration and accounting, which can lead to increased costs.

In conclusion, when getting into a joint venture, it is critical to understand what kind of venture you’re getting into and your level of liability. There’s no perfect structure for all situations since each structure is designed for specific purposes. A contractual development agreement could be favorable for a short-term venture while a corporation could be the best structure for a long-term project. The cost also differs with each structure, so that should also be put into consideration.







More Articles From This Author







Trending Stories










Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE



ARCHIVES

2020
  • January 2020 (272)
  • February 2020 (310)
  • March 2020 (390)
  • April 2020 (321)
  • May 2020 (335)
  • June 2020 (327)
  • July 2020 (334)
  • August 2020 (276)
  • September 2020 (214)
  • October 2020 (214)
  • 2019
  • January 2019 (253)
  • February 2019 (216)
  • March 2019 (285)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (272)
  • June 2019 (251)
  • July 2019 (338)
  • August 2019 (293)
  • September 2019 (306)
  • October 2019 (313)
  • November 2019 (362)
  • December 2019 (319)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (213)
  • March 2018 (278)
  • April 2018 (225)
  • May 2018 (238)
  • June 2018 (178)
  • July 2018 (256)
  • August 2018 (249)
  • September 2018 (256)
  • October 2018 (287)
  • November 2018 (284)
  • December 2018 (185)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (194)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (205)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (165)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (190)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (245)
  • June 2016 (182)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (248)
  • September 2016 (234)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (166)
  • April 2015 (108)
  • May 2015 (116)
  • June 2015 (120)
  • July 2015 (148)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (188)
  • October 2015 (169)
  • November 2015 (173)
  • December 2015 (207)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950