Creators of “Squid Game” Crypto Steal $2.1M Plunging it to $0

KEY POINTS
Scammers love the crypto space since it is incredibly difficult to tell them apart from the legit creators. But does this mean that investors will now be careful when they encounter shady cryptocurrencies?
Creators behind a crypto called SQUID based off popular Netflix series Squid Game have effectively cashed out the project stealing over 2.1 million dollars.
The digital currency, SQUID, which had surged as high as $2,861 plummeted to $0 as of Monday following the rug pull.
A rug pull in the digital currency world means cashing out of crypto coins in exchange for real money, rapidly devaluing its value.
SQUID’s billing was for tokens that could be used for a new online game inspired by the popular Netflix series.
However, there were red flags associated with it. For one, the SQUID crypto coin was barely a week old and it was facilitated by a three-week old website marred with plenty of bizarre spelling and grammatical errors.
Another red flag was that the creators could purchase the crypto but couldn’t sell it. Consequently, the crypto’s SQUID’s Telegram channel set up by the unknown hucksters did not allow comments from outsiders. Also, the Twitter account made it impossible for anyone to reply to posts.
ALSO READ: Investing in REITs – The Options, and How the Kenyan Market Works
The website, which was hosted at SquidGame.cash, has disappeared, along with every social media handles associated with it.
A lot of investors, who were warned by CoinMarketCap and Gizmodo, did not realize these red flags too soon – or they probably ignored them.
CoinMarketCap displayed a warning to investors to “exercise extreme caution” if they bought the crypto.
Their ignorance, or negligence, was perhaps overshadowed by different news sites reporting that the new crypto had increased by 83,000 percent in only a few days. May of them saw this as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.
This particular rug pull is the latest example of scammers exploiting pop culture to attract attention.
A similar incident happened earlier in 2021 with another cryptocurrency called Mando, based on the series The Mandalorian. Mando used images from the Disney+’s hit TV show—without permission from Disney.
Scammers love the crypto space since it is incredibly difficult to tell them apart from the legit creators. In light of these situations, does it mean that investors will now be careful when they encounter shady cryptocurrencies?
Hopefully so.
About Soko Directory Team
Soko Directory is a Financial and Markets digital portal that tracks brands, listed firms on the NSE, SMEs and trend setters in the markets eco-system.Find us on Facebook: facebook.com/SokoDirectory and on Twitter: twitter.com/SokoDirectory
- January 2025 (119)
- February 2025 (191)
- March 2025 (212)
- April 2025 (193)
- May 2025 (161)
- June 2025 (157)
- July 2025 (226)
- August 2025 (211)
- September 2025 (222)
- January 2024 (238)
- February 2024 (227)
- March 2024 (190)
- April 2024 (133)
- May 2024 (157)
- June 2024 (145)
- July 2024 (136)
- August 2024 (154)
- September 2024 (212)
- October 2024 (255)
- November 2024 (196)
- December 2024 (143)
- January 2023 (182)
- February 2023 (203)
- March 2023 (322)
- April 2023 (297)
- May 2023 (267)
- June 2023 (214)
- July 2023 (212)
- August 2023 (257)
- September 2023 (237)
- October 2023 (264)
- November 2023 (286)
- December 2023 (177)
- January 2022 (293)
- February 2022 (329)
- March 2022 (358)
- April 2022 (292)
- May 2022 (271)
- June 2022 (232)
- July 2022 (278)
- August 2022 (253)
- September 2022 (246)
- October 2022 (196)
- November 2022 (232)
- December 2022 (167)
- January 2021 (182)
- February 2021 (227)
- March 2021 (325)
- April 2021 (259)
- May 2021 (285)
- June 2021 (272)
- July 2021 (277)
- August 2021 (232)
- September 2021 (271)
- October 2021 (304)
- November 2021 (364)
- December 2021 (249)
- January 2020 (272)
- February 2020 (310)
- March 2020 (390)
- April 2020 (321)
- May 2020 (335)
- June 2020 (327)
- July 2020 (333)
- August 2020 (276)
- September 2020 (214)
- October 2020 (233)
- November 2020 (242)
- December 2020 (187)
- January 2019 (251)
- February 2019 (215)
- March 2019 (283)
- April 2019 (254)
- May 2019 (269)
- June 2019 (249)
- July 2019 (335)
- August 2019 (293)
- September 2019 (306)
- October 2019 (313)
- November 2019 (362)
- December 2019 (318)
- January 2018 (291)
- February 2018 (213)
- March 2018 (275)
- April 2018 (223)
- May 2018 (235)
- June 2018 (176)
- July 2018 (256)
- August 2018 (247)
- September 2018 (255)
- October 2018 (282)
- November 2018 (282)
- December 2018 (184)
- January 2017 (183)
- February 2017 (194)
- March 2017 (207)
- April 2017 (104)
- May 2017 (169)
- June 2017 (205)
- July 2017 (189)
- August 2017 (195)
- September 2017 (186)
- October 2017 (235)
- November 2017 (253)
- December 2017 (266)
- January 2016 (164)
- February 2016 (165)
- March 2016 (189)
- April 2016 (143)
- May 2016 (245)
- June 2016 (182)
- July 2016 (271)
- August 2016 (247)
- September 2016 (233)
- October 2016 (191)
- November 2016 (243)
- December 2016 (153)
- January 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (164)
- April 2015 (107)
- May 2015 (116)
- June 2015 (119)
- July 2015 (145)
- August 2015 (157)
- September 2015 (186)
- October 2015 (169)
- November 2015 (173)
- December 2015 (205)
- March 2014 (2)
- March 2013 (10)
- June 2013 (1)
- March 2012 (7)
- April 2012 (15)
- May 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (2)
- December 2012 (1)