The Goose That Lays the Golden Egg: Is the Finance Act 2023 On The Verge Of Repeal?

KEY POINTS
We think the matters raised in this petition are weighty, and while legal arguments are yet to be made, we worry about the eventual outcome. This success of the petition may involve a repeat of some of the elements of the budget-making process. This could provide some uncertainty and delay some of the development projects set out.
The Finance Act 2023 is expected to raise an additional 211.0 billion shillings from all tax brackets – the largest chunk comes from income tax.
The High Court declined to lift conservatory orders which suspended the Act. The respondents (comprising the Executive and the National Assembly), also sought abeyance of the ruling in order to move to the Court of Appeal, which was also declined.
The Court agreed with the petitioners that the case raised substantial Constitutional issues of law and fact. The petitioners are led by Busia Senator Okiya Omtatah Okoiti, an activist turned politician with a long history of taking on high-profile litigation in the public interest.
Related Content: We Shall Be Here No Matter What: Pass The Finance Bill, We Are Ready
The Petitioners argue that the Finance Act 2023 was enacted in violation of the Constitution and the Public Finance Management Act by failing to submit contents of the Finance Bill 2023 to the Senate for input as required by the Constitution – and that it would therefore not have birthed the Finance Act 2023. The concurrence of the Speakers of the National Assembly and Senate is a mandatory preliminary step in the legislative process. Some specific provisions are listed and argued to have been unconstitutionally enacted into law without being subjected to consideration by the Senate.
Read More:
- Dear Entrepreneur, Here Are 10 Money Lessons You Should Learn At 35
- Here Are The Top 25 Money Market Funds In Kenya Right Now
- The 20 Essential Steps for Making, Managing, And Growing Your Money Legally with The Abojani
Another argument made by the applicants is that the Finance Bill 2023 went beyond incidental matters relating to tax, therefore exceeding the threshold as a money Bill. This included proposed changes to Employment Act (2007), The Special Economic Zones Act (2015), The Export Processing Zones Act (2015), Kenya Roads Board Act (1999), Kenya Revenue Authority Act (1995), and the Retirement Benefits Act (1997). The petitioners also argue that some aspects (four laws) of the Finance Bill were sneaked into the Finance Bill without public participation. They sought to have these four and the original 13 laws introduced after the public participation stage was voided.
Related Content: High Court Suspends The Implementation Of The Finance Bill
The petitioners also argue that the housing levy as proposed cannot be included in the Finance Act 2023 as the Act can only contain measures to collect revenue to finance the budget estimates. If it is to be included in the Finance Act, then a fund would have to be created first.
Other issues raised by the petitioners is that there were no revenue estimates in the Appropriation Bill (Budget Estimates), rendering the Finance Act unconstitutional as the Act appears to authorize measures to raise revenue not contained in the 2023/2024 Appropriation Act. It is the revenue estimates which disclose the amounts expected to be realized from each tax measure taken. They, therefore, argue that both the budget Estimates and the Appropriation Act 2023 were incomplete and could not have been used to enact a Finance Act.
The Finance Act 2023 was also supposed to have been enacted within 90 days after passing the Appropriation Bill, but it was passed concurrently with the estimates.
Related Content: Kenyans Paying More For Fuel Than What The Finance Act Stipulates
The petitioners argue that the monumental procedural infractions stated above could not be cured and that the Finance Bill 2023 and the resultant Finance Act 2023 were unconstitutional. The prayer sought from the Court by the petitioners was to suspend the Finance Act 2023 in its entirety until it determines its constitutionality and legal validity before it allows them to be imposed on Kenyans.
We think the matters raised in this petition are weighty, and while legal arguments are yet to be made, we worry about the eventual outcome. This success of the petition may involve a repeat of some of the elements of the budget-making process. This could provide some uncertainty and delay some of the development projects set out.
Related Content: Finance Act 2023 Remains Suspended, High Court Tells Ruto
Data and content from Standard Investment Bank (SIB)
About Soko Directory Team
Soko Directory is a Financial and Markets digital portal that tracks brands, listed firms on the NSE, SMEs and trend setters in the markets eco-system.Find us on Facebook: facebook.com/SokoDirectory and on Twitter: twitter.com/SokoDirectory
- January 2026 (220)
- February 2026 (246)
- March 2026 (286)
- April 2026 (115)
- January 2025 (119)
- February 2025 (191)
- March 2025 (212)
- April 2025 (193)
- May 2025 (161)
- June 2025 (157)
- July 2025 (227)
- August 2025 (211)
- September 2025 (270)
- October 2025 (297)
- November 2025 (230)
- December 2025 (219)
- January 2024 (238)
- February 2024 (227)
- March 2024 (190)
- April 2024 (133)
- May 2024 (157)
- June 2024 (145)
- July 2024 (136)
- August 2024 (154)
- September 2024 (212)
- October 2024 (255)
- November 2024 (196)
- December 2024 (143)
- January 2023 (182)
- February 2023 (203)
- March 2023 (322)
- April 2023 (297)
- May 2023 (267)
- June 2023 (214)
- July 2023 (212)
- August 2023 (257)
- September 2023 (237)
- October 2023 (264)
- November 2023 (286)
- December 2023 (177)
- January 2022 (293)
- February 2022 (329)
- March 2022 (358)
- April 2022 (292)
- May 2022 (271)
- June 2022 (232)
- July 2022 (278)
- August 2022 (253)
- September 2022 (246)
- October 2022 (196)
- November 2022 (232)
- December 2022 (167)
- January 2021 (182)
- February 2021 (227)
- March 2021 (325)
- April 2021 (259)
- May 2021 (285)
- June 2021 (272)
- July 2021 (277)
- August 2021 (232)
- September 2021 (271)
- October 2021 (304)
- November 2021 (364)
- December 2021 (249)
- January 2020 (272)
- February 2020 (310)
- March 2020 (390)
- April 2020 (321)
- May 2020 (335)
- June 2020 (327)
- July 2020 (333)
- August 2020 (276)
- September 2020 (214)
- October 2020 (233)
- November 2020 (242)
- December 2020 (187)
- January 2019 (251)
- February 2019 (215)
- March 2019 (283)
- April 2019 (254)
- May 2019 (269)
- June 2019 (249)
- July 2019 (335)
- August 2019 (293)
- September 2019 (306)
- October 2019 (313)
- November 2019 (362)
- December 2019 (318)
- January 2018 (291)
- February 2018 (213)
- March 2018 (275)
- April 2018 (223)
- May 2018 (235)
- June 2018 (176)
- July 2018 (256)
- August 2018 (247)
- September 2018 (255)
- October 2018 (282)
- November 2018 (282)
- December 2018 (184)
- January 2017 (183)
- February 2017 (194)
- March 2017 (207)
- April 2017 (104)
- May 2017 (169)
- June 2017 (205)
- July 2017 (189)
- August 2017 (195)
- September 2017 (186)
- October 2017 (235)
- November 2017 (253)
- December 2017 (266)
- January 2016 (164)
- February 2016 (165)
- March 2016 (189)
- April 2016 (143)
- May 2016 (245)
- June 2016 (182)
- July 2016 (271)
- August 2016 (247)
- September 2016 (233)
- October 2016 (191)
- November 2016 (243)
- December 2016 (153)
- January 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (164)
- April 2015 (107)
- May 2015 (116)
- June 2015 (119)
- July 2015 (145)
- August 2015 (157)
- September 2015 (186)
- October 2015 (169)
- November 2015 (173)
- December 2015 (205)
- March 2014 (2)
- March 2013 (10)
- June 2013 (1)
- March 2012 (7)
- April 2012 (15)
- May 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (2)
- December 2012 (1)
