The Hidden Costs Of Kenya’s Tier 1 Banks Favoring Government Securities Over SMEs

Kenya’s nine tier 1 banks made a staggering Sh110.39 billion in interest income from their investments in government securities in the first half of the year. While this figure represents a 17.87% increase from the Sh93.67 billion earned during the same period last year, it poses serious economic implications, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that are starved of credit. These institutions, tasked with supporting the economy through financing the private sector, particularly SMEs, are increasingly funneling capital towards the government instead, seeing it as a lower-risk investment.

Government securities are indeed an attractive option for banks. They are virtually risk-free, backed by sovereign credit, and yield stable returns. In comparison, lending to SMEs is perceived as more volatile, subject to the whims of market fluctuations and the financial health of these smaller, often undercapitalized entities. The banks’ preference for such low-risk investments is understandable from a shareholder’s perspective, as the goal is to generate consistent profits with minimal risk. However, this strategic shift presents a significant challenge for the broader economy.

Read Also: Role Of Banks In Supporting Climate Resilience Investments For Agriculture

One of the main consequences of this trend is the “crowding out” effect, where government borrowing consumes a large portion of available credit in the financial market. As banks direct more funds to government securities, there is less capital available for private sector lending. SMEs, which form the backbone of Kenya’s economy, are the hardest hit by this. Unable to access affordable credit, these businesses face significant operational challenges. Without the liquidity to expand or even sustain their operations, many are forced to scale down or close entirely, leading to job losses and diminished economic output.

Data from the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) reveals that while loans to the private sector grew marginally, government borrowing grew exponentially. This disparity is alarming, considering that SMEs contribute more than 40% of Kenya’s GDP and employ about 80% of the workforce. With these statistics in mind, it’s clear that the misallocation of capital toward government securities, at the expense of SMEs, could have severe long-term repercussions for economic growth and job creation.

Read Also: Banks Turn To Satellite Towns For Growth

The ripple effect of this capital misallocation becomes more pronounced when considering the impact on innovation and entrepreneurship. SMEs are often the incubators of new ideas and technologies. Without access to credit, they are unable to innovate, meaning Kenya risks stalling its advancement in key sectors like fintech, agribusiness, and manufacturing. A stagnating SME sector also means fewer opportunities for new businesses to enter the market, reducing competition and ultimately harming consumers through higher prices and reduced choice.

Moreover, the prolonged focus on government securities may create a false sense of security within the banking sector itself. While short-term profits are guaranteed, over-reliance on government debt could lead to vulnerabilities, especially in the event of a government default or financial instability. The government’s insatiable appetite for debt, which shows no signs of abating, could one day lead to a fiscal crisis. If such a scenario were to unfold, banks heavily invested in government securities would be exposed to significant losses, bringing the entire financial system under pressure.

Furthermore, the high returns from government securities contribute to a mispricing of risk. As banks enjoy lucrative returns from low-risk investments, they may become increasingly unwilling to lend to SMEs, viewing them as too risky by comparison. This risk aversion exacerbates the existing credit gap, as SMEs are left with few alternatives but to seek financing from informal sources or microfinance institutions, which typically charge exorbitant interest rates.

In addition to stifling growth in the SME sector, this trend is contributing to wealth inequality. The profits earned from government securities primarily benefit the shareholders of these tier 1 banks, a small, wealthy segment of the population. Meanwhile, the lack of access to credit continues to plague the majority of Kenyans, particularly those reliant on SMEs for employment and income. This wealth disparity, fueled by the banking sector’s preference for risk-free returns, could lead to growing social unrest and political instability.

A broader economic consequence of this trend is that it inhibits the development of Kenya’s industrial base. SMEs in sectors such as manufacturing, agro-processing, and textiles, which are key to industrialization, require significant capital investment to scale their operations. Without access to affordable financing, these industries are unable to grow and compete on the global stage. As a result, Kenya remains reliant on imports for goods that could otherwise be produced locally, further exacerbating the trade deficit.

Read Also: The Death Of Kenyan Manufacturing: A Sinister Plot by Government, Banks, And Politicians To Turn Kenya Into A Fully Trading Country

Another dimension of the problem is the role of monetary policy in exacerbating the situation. The CBK’s tight monetary stance, characterized by high-interest rates, makes borrowing more expensive for SMEs. However, for banks, the high rates on government securities provide an attractive, low-risk alternative to lending to the private sector. Thus, even as the CBK calls for more support for SMEs, its monetary policies indirectly incentivize banks to do the opposite.

The government’s dependence on domestic borrowing is also a key factor in this issue. Rather than exploring alternative financing mechanisms, such as international capital markets or public-private partnerships, the government has increasingly turned to local banks for its funding needs. This practice not only crowds out SMEs but also drives up interest rates, further restricting access to affordable credit.

It’s worth noting that this isn’t just a Kenyan problem. Across many developing economies, banks are incentivized to lend to governments rather than the private sector, due to the perceived safety of sovereign debt. However, the scale of the problem in Kenya is particularly concerning, given the size of its SME sector and its critical role in driving economic growth.

Read Also: The Transition to Risk-Based Lending In Kenya: A New Frontier For Credit Access As CBK Approves All 38 Banks

Solutions to this problem require a multifaceted approach. First, there needs to be a concerted effort by the government to reduce its reliance on domestic borrowing. This can be achieved through fiscal reforms that reduce the budget deficit and explore alternative sources of funding, such as foreign direct investment and international loans. By reducing its borrowing needs, the government can free up capital for the private sector.

At the same time, there is a need for financial sector reforms that incentivize lending to SMEs. The creation of SME-focused credit guarantees, for instance, could help de-risk lending to this sector. Banks could be encouraged to allocate a certain percentage of their loan portfolio to SMEs, backed by partial guarantees from the government or multilateral agencies.

The banking sector itself also needs to reassess its approach to risk. While government securities may offer a safe and profitable return in the short term, the long-term health of the economy depends on a vibrant and growing SME sector. Banks should therefore balance their portfolios, ensuring that they provide adequate support to SMEs while still maintaining their investments in government securities.

Ultimately, if this trend continues unchecked, the Kenyan economy will suffer. While tier 1 banks may continue to enjoy strong profits in the short term, the long-term consequences of starving SMEs of credit could result in a less dynamic economy, higher unemployment, and increased social inequality. It is therefore in the banks’ own interest to ensure that their lending practices support not just their shareholders but the broader economy as well. After all, a healthy, growing economy benefits everyone.

Read Also: Why Banks Should Fear And Why Every Entrepreneur Needs A Sacco Account