Skip to content
Government and Policy

The Law Kenya Needs: Hold Public Officials to the Standards They Set

BY Steve Biko Wafula · October 24, 2024 03:10 pm

KEY POINTS

Cabinet Secretaries, Members of Parliament, and their advisors should be required to rely on the Social Health Insurance Fund (SHIF), while their children should be enrolled in the Competency-Based Curriculum (CBC). Such a law would foster genuine reforms and ultimately ensure that policies are crafted and implemented with the public’s best interests at heart.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

Public officials often defend substandard services with claims of budget constraints. If they had to use these services, this excuse would no longer hold water. A personal stake in public services would eliminate complacency, pushing officials to find innovative solutions to long-standing problems. Resources would be allocated more effectively, ensuring maximum impact with minimal wastage.

Public office demands accountability, transparency, and a genuine commitment to the citizenry. Yet, Kenya finds itself constantly plagued by corruption scandals, wasted resources, and a political elite whose actions reveal a disregard for the consequences of their policies. To address this, a simple but profound law should be enacted: all public officials and their families, especially those in policy-making and oversight roles, must use the very facilities they provide to Kenyans.

Cabinet Secretaries, Members of Parliament, and their advisors should be required to rely on the Social Health Insurance Fund (SHIF), while their children should be enrolled in the Competency-Based Curriculum (CBC). Such a law would foster genuine reforms and ultimately ensure that policies are crafted and implemented with the public’s best interests at heart.

A law demanding that public officials utilize public services is not merely symbolic; it is transformative. When officials have to live by the decisions they make, they would be more cautious and meticulous about crafting policies. By using public health services under SHIF, officials would have a firsthand understanding of its effectiveness, gaps, and inefficiencies. This experience would drive reform efforts, resulting in a system that better serves all Kenyans, rather than one that exists in name only.

Kenya’s Constitution and various laws establish principles that mandate responsible management of public resources. The Public Finance Management Act, for example, calls for transparent, effective, and prudent use of public funds. However, these laws often remain unimplemented or selectively enforced. If policy implementation directly impacted the lives of those responsible, compliance and accountability would no longer be negotiable. The law must mandate not only the use of public health and education services by officials but also penalties for non-compliance, ensuring that political immunity cannot shield individuals from the consequences of their actions.

Read Also: Five Governance Strategies That Can Help Accelerate The AI Opportunity In Africa

Ensuring adherence to this proposed law is possible with robust monitoring frameworks and legal accountability measures. Kenya’s Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) and the Office of the Auditor General could jointly oversee compliance, with powers to investigate, audit, and penalize non-compliant officials. By coupling audits with independent citizen oversight, we create a transparent system in which adherence is constantly evaluated and reported.

Laws that stipulate punitive consequences for wasteful and irresponsible policies are essential. Article 10 of the Kenyan Constitution emphasizes good governance, integrity, transparency, and accountability, principles that this proposed law could strongly enforce. It would hold officials accountable for any policies or actions leading to the wastage of public funds, with penalties that include dismissal from office, financial restitution, and legal prosecution for severe cases of neglect or intentional mismanagement.

Moreover, such a law would restore trust in government, something severely lacking in Kenya today. When the public sees leaders suffering the same frustrations they do, a sense of solidarity develops. The current disconnect between public officials and the citizens they serve fosters resentment, disillusionment, and apathy. A requirement for officials to use public services would rebuild trust, as citizens could finally witness a shared investment in national services. Only when officials feel the consequences of their policies firsthand will they prioritize improvements over personal gain.

Policy failure costs Kenya billions each year, with funds lost to mismanaged or abandoned projects. If officials were held directly responsible, they would exercise greater caution in resource allocation. Policies that waste public funds would not only result in penalties but also require financial restitution from those responsible, including their immediate families, whose privileges are funded by taxpayer money. This approach would compel officials to treat public resources as a sacred trust rather than a personal purse.

The policy of compelling public officials to use public facilities is not without precedent. Several countries have implemented similar laws or guidelines, requiring politicians to enroll their children in public schools or use public healthcare services. This promotes a culture of accountability, as policymakers, bound by their decisions, are far less likely to propose underfunded, inefficient programs. Kenya, too, should adopt this standard to prevent situations where officials legislate for the people but create exceptions for themselves and their families.

By mandating that the children of politicians attend public schools under the CBC curriculum, the government would have to address any challenges directly. Officials would experience the curriculum’s merits and shortcomings, catalyzing meaningful improvements rather than superficial tweaks. Kenyan children deserve a quality education, and public officials must champion this cause by engaging with the system they legislate. Such a requirement would drive reforms and ensure that the education system evolves with the best interests of the students, not political rhetoric.

Health policies would also improve significantly under this law. By requiring politicians and public officials to enroll in SHIF, the government would have an undeniable obligation to streamline healthcare services. Issues with delayed reimbursements, inadequate facilities, and staff shortages would no longer be mere statistics; they would become urgent, personal problems for the policymakers themselves. The pressures of inadequate healthcare would compel action, resulting in a more efficient and effective SHIF, with benefits for all Kenyans.

Furthermore, the law should apply not only to current officeholders but also to their advisors, consultants, and contractors involved in policy and budgeting. This would prevent outsourcing responsibility and ensure that everyone involved in national planning, budgeting, and execution faces the impact of their decisions. Holding each level of policymaking accountable is crucial to fostering a sustainable culture of public service.

Enforcement mechanisms would also be essential. The Auditor General’s office should publish regular compliance reports, detailing public officials’ adherence to using public facilities. Non-compliance should be treated as a gross violation of public duty, warranting strict legal action. Creating a system of public monitoring and reporting would ensure that this law is upheld across all government levels, from the Cabinet to Parliament, ensuring universal adherence.

The law should also institute a reporting system for citizens to submit complaints and observations. Empowering the public to participate in the enforcement of this law would increase transparency and bolster its effectiveness. This collaborative approach would encourage a sense of shared responsibility for Kenya’s development, ensuring that citizens and officials alike are stakeholders in the country’s progress.

An additional safeguard would be the establishment of a public fund sourced from fines levied on non-compliant officials. This fund could finance underfunded public services, turning penalties for non-adherence into a direct contribution to national welfare. This innovative approach would generate financial resources for healthcare, education, and other public services, while simultaneously holding officials accountable.

Kenya’s development hinges on the responsible use of public funds. The law must prevent wastage by making those responsible feel the weight of their decisions. When officials face penalties for negligence or waste, they will begin to prioritize policies that serve the nation’s best interests. Officials will no longer act with impunity, knowing they are legally bound to address the fallout of their policies personally.

Moreover, requiring public officials to use public facilities can become a powerful deterrent to corruption. The more public services are embedded in the lives of those who govern, the less appealing it becomes to misuse funds earmarked for these sectors. Corruption thrives when there is a disconnect between decision-makers and public services. Bridging this gap through a policy of mandatory usage would reduce opportunities for graft, fostering a culture of integrity.

Read Also: The Misuse Of Public Funds In Kenya: A Call For Responsible Governance

This law would empower citizens, giving them a tangible way to measure government accountability. Currently, accountability mechanisms are either complex or hidden behind bureaucratic processes, making it difficult for citizens to track government action. With public officials using public services, accountability would become visible, fostering a culture of active civic engagement and scrutiny.

Public officials often defend substandard services with claims of budget constraints. If they had to use these services, this excuse would no longer hold water. A personal stake in public services would eliminate complacency, pushing officials to find innovative solutions to long-standing problems. Resources would be allocated more effectively, ensuring maximum impact with minimal wastage.

Furthermore, international investors would view Kenya more favorably, as a country with a law binding its leaders to the same standards as its citizens demonstrates integrity and commitment. This policy would signal to the world that Kenya’s government values accountability, creating a more attractive environment for sustainable investment.

We must recognize that Kenya’s resources belong to all Kenyans. Policies that protect public funds and penalize their wastage are essential to sustainable development. By ensuring that public officials and their families use public facilities, Kenya could build a culture of accountability, transparency, and shared responsibility.

In conclusion, Kenya’s progress hinges on more than just well-crafted policies; it requires genuine accountability. A law mandating that public officials and their families utilize public facilities is not only feasible but necessary. This law would ensure that policies are grounded in reality, prioritizing the welfare of the citizenry over personal convenience. For Kenya to thrive, it is time to hold leaders to the same standards they set, building a society where public service is synonymous with shared sacrifice and progress.

Read Also: African Leaders Launch The African School Of Governance Initiative

Steve Biko is the CEO OF Soko Directory and the founder of Hidalgo Group of Companies. Steve is currently developing his career in law, finance, entrepreneurship and digital consultancy; and has been implementing consultancy assignments for client organizations comprising of trainings besides capacity building in entrepreneurial matters.He can be reached on: +254 20 510 1124 or Email: info@sokodirectory.com

Trending Stories
Related Articles
Explore Soko Directory
Soko Directory Archives