Tariff Tremors And Token Responses: Kenya’s Toothless Rejoinder To U.S. Trade Shocks

The press release issued by Hon. Lee Kinyanjui, Cabinet Secretary for Kenya’s Ministry of Investments, Trade and Industry, in response to the United States’ imposition of a 10% tariff on Kenyan exports, is emblematic of a leadership that remains reactive rather than strategic. At a critical juncture where the rules of global trade are being redrawn, Kenya needed to deliver a robust, imaginative, and forward-looking policy blueprint—not a lukewarm assurance note laced with bland optimism.

A 10% tariff, though seemingly moderate when compared to the harsher rates slapped on Vietnam (46%) or Sri Lanka (44%), is still a severe blow to Kenyan exporters. In trade terms, even a 2% tariff shift can drastically alter supply chain decisions. The release appears to downplay this impact by focusing on relative comparison instead of absolute competitiveness.

The Cabinet Secretary’s framing of this development as an “opportunity” might appear diplomatically sound, but it dangerously flirts with delusion. Tariffs, historically, are tools of protectionism and economic coercion. They distort comparative advantage, discourage specialization, and disproportionately punish smaller, less diversified economies like Kenya’s. Why is this fundamental truth completely absent from the ministry’s narrative?

Moreover, the idea that Kenya can “leverage its competitive edge in textiles” ignores two decades of declining investment in the country’s textile value chain. According to the Kenya Association of Manufacturers (KAM), the country’s textile exports underperform due to high electricity costs, logistics inefficiencies, and bureaucratic red tape. How can Kenya realistically pivot as an alternative supplier to U.S. buyers without solving these long-standing bottlenecks?

Read Also: How Ruto’s Incompetent Government Is Undermining Kenyan Farmers Because Of Greed

The response also betrays a romantic optimism about new manufacturing opportunities. But where is the data backing up this claim? Kenya’s manufacturing sector contributes less than 8% to GDP and has been shrinking, not growing. According to the World Bank, Kenya has lost ground in the manufacturing index for five consecutive years. Attracting investment amid global reshoring trends and nearshoring preferences requires more than rhetoric—it needs a reform revolution.

The Cabinet Secretary mentions “value addition” in passing, but that buzzword has become the policy equivalent of a fig leaf. Without a detailed, sector-by-sector breakdown of where Kenya could realistically add value and how the government will subsidize such transformation, the term is hollow. Where are the tax incentives? Where is the industrial clustering policy? Where is the trade finance mechanism to de-risk SME entry into processing?

Most damning, perhaps, is the silence around intra-African trade. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) was supposed to be the crown jewel of Africa’s economic independence, yet the release doesn’t mention it once. Why is the ministry not leveraging this moment to reduce Kenya’s overreliance on volatile U.S. markets and foster resilient regional trade ecosystems?

In 2023, only 17% of Kenya’s exports went to African countries—an indictment of policy inertia and misplaced priorities. South-South trade has far more potential for growth. Kenya should be deepening ties with Ethiopia, DRC, and Nigeria, not scrambling to placate a market that’s already moved on.

And then there’s the absurd faith in stakeholder meetings. “We are working with stakeholders” has become a bureaucratic ritual in Kenya that translates to endless coffee-fueled seminars with zero tangible output. This language betrays a mindset still stuck in form over function. What’s needed is action, not consultative theater.

What does not appear in the statement is arguably more telling than what does. There’s no mention of digital trade, green manufacturing, or how Kenya plans to harness its demographic dividend to leapfrog traditional trade models. There is no indication of any reform to the ports, to customs processes, or to trade-related corruption—all of which inflate export costs.

Also conspicuously absent is a strategy for unilateral liberalization. As a small open economy, Kenya stands to gain the most from embracing free trade aggressively. Nobel laureate Paul Krugman and trade economists such as Jagdish Bhagwati have long argued that developing nations can gain significantly by lowering tariffs unilaterally, rather than waiting for reciprocity. Why hasn’t Kenya explored this path?

The U.S. tariff move also signals a breakdown of the WTO’s Most Favoured Nation principle. In this new trade order, bilateralism is king, and countries must build bespoke alliances. Kenya’s silence on how it intends to reposition itself diplomatically to secure better bilateral deals reflects either paralysis or delusion.

The Ministry’s release is also woefully silent on data. Where are the figures showing the impact of these tariffs on Kenya’s horticulture, tea, or coffee sectors? What’s the projected job loss? How many SMEs stand to close? The public deserves to know the scale of the disruption—not be pacified with hollow optimism.

The idea that increased demand from buyers shunning higher-cost suppliers like Bangladesh or China will magically flow to Kenya overlooks logistics, price competitiveness, and buyer habits. U.S. buyers are risk-averse and work within well-established procurement pipelines. Kenya is not a plug-and-play substitute.

Furthermore, the ministry offers no cushioning measures for affected exporters. Where is the emergency fund? Where is the credit guarantee scheme? Where is the plan to subsidize transition costs or create hedges for foreign exchange volatility?

The lack of urgency in the release suggests a disturbing disconnect between Nairobi’s policy elite and the lived reality of exporters in Ruiru, Kitengela, and Mombasa. Many of them operate on tight margins. A 10% tariff might as well be a death sentence.

The document does not even broach the subject of tariff retaliation, perhaps wisely. But where is the plan to lobby for exemption or negotiate a phased implementation? Silence is not strategy—it is surrender.

Kenya’s current trade policy lacks ideological clarity. It oscillates between neoliberal platitudes and protectionist impulses. This inconsistency breeds investor uncertainty. The press release could have been an opportunity to clarify the government’s trade philosophy. Instead, it is a fog of buzzwords.

Perhaps most worryingly, the statement does not project confidence. It is not the language of a country standing tall in a volatile global economy—it is the mumbling of a regime caught flat-footed. Kenya must learn to speak with assertiveness and self-belief on trade matters.

Other African countries are adapting faster. Rwanda is repositioning itself as a logistics hub. Ghana is building a light manufacturing base. Ethiopia is building trade corridors with Djibouti and Somalia. Kenya risks being left behind.

Trade policy is national strategy. It is not a press release exercise. It is a long game played with surgical precision and ideological discipline. What Kenya needs now is not more policy statements—it needs a coherent vision and the courage to execute it.

It is time to get off the trade treadmill of donor appeasement and western dependency. A pan-African supply chain strategy—rooted in AfCFTA, supported by regional financial institutions, and anchored in local innovation—is the only way forward.

Kenya has enough skilled youth, entrepreneurial drive, and regional goodwill to lead this transformation. But it needs a trade ministry that’s ready to move from copy-paste diplomacy to radical, unshackled imagination.

The trade cabinet must stop being a megaphone of foreign developments and start becoming a trumpet for African economic awakening. The current response is not only inadequate—it is out of tune with the moment.

A genuine policy would call for shock therapy on infrastructure, power, financing, and logistics—immediately. It would declare an industrial emergency and act with the urgency of a wartime cabinet. Kenya’s economic sovereignty depends on it.

The Ministry must do better. The time for comfort statements is over. The time for revolutionary economic thinking is now. Otherwise, we will keep exporting coffee and importing Starbucks. That is the price of platitude.

Read Also: Stanbic March 2025 PMI Rises To 51.7 From 50.6 Last Month, The Highest In 10 Months