How Raila Odinga Lost a Generation Before His Death

Raila Odinga’s name once stirred a fire unmatched in the hearts of millions. For decades, he stood as the conscience of the nation, a symbol of defiance against tyranny, the man who dared to dream of a Kenya governed by justice and equality. His voice roared across generations — from the days of detention without trial to the long nights of stolen elections. Yet in his twilight years, the man who had embodied resistance chose silence in the face of betrayal, shaking hands with the very force he had spent his life opposing. That handshake with William Ruto was not just political — it was spiritual treason to the youth who had believed he was unbought and unbowed.
The youth, disillusioned and restless, had looked to Raila as a father figure who understood their pain. They had fought for him, bled for him, and risked everything in the streets believing his cause was pure. When he joined hands with Ruto, they saw not strategy but surrender — a man choosing comfort over conviction. The handshake that was meant to heal the nation instead shattered a covenant built over forty years of struggle. Overnight, Raila went from the people’s liberator to their greatest disappointment.
For many young Kenyans, the handshake symbolized a betrayal of ideals, not just alliances. They had endured police brutality under governments he opposed, believing his presidency would end the oppression. Yet when he embraced Ruto, whose administration symbolized the very corruption and arrogance they loathed, it felt like their suffering had been in vain. They saw in that pact a man too tired to fight, too weary to resist, too willing to trade legacy for relevance.
Raila’s decision fractured his movement. The Azimio generation that once marched behind his banner dissolved into bitterness. The same youths who had shielded him from police batons during the protests now mocked him online, calling him a sellout. They felt used — emotionally, politically, and symbolically. They had imagined that even in defeat, Raila would stand with them, but his silence during the Ruto regime’s excesses was unbearable. The man who once shouted “No reform, no election!” now whispered “Let’s give peace a chance.”
The irony was cruel. Raila had always preached about justice, equality, and the fight for the common mwananchi. Yet by aligning himself with Ruto, the architect of policies that burdened the poor, he became indistinguishable from the system he once despised. To the youth, it was as if he had crossed over to the other side of history — from victim to collaborator. His death, therefore, finds Kenya torn not between mourning and celebration, but between nostalgia and disappointment.
Many hoped that Raila would redeem himself before 2027. That he would rise once more, not as a candidate, but as a moral elder who could heal the wounds of betrayal. But death, cruel and unannounced, stole that chance. The streets that once sang “Baba! Baba!” now whisper with regret — that the man who taught them to fight also taught them that even heroes can fall. His demise closes a chapter, not of triumph, but of unfinished reconciliation.
The youth’s anger was not without reason. They had watched as corruption ballooned, taxes suffocated them, and jobs evaporated, while Raila smiled beside Ruto at national events. Each handshake photo felt like another stab in their backs. How could the man who once called Ruto a thief now treat him as a brother? The contradictions were too many, the wounds too deep. It was as if the revolution had been traded for a seat at the table of power.
Raila underestimated the intelligence and conviction of a new generation. These were not the same youths of 2007 or 2013 — they were digitally connected, politically aware, and fiercely idealistic. They wanted authenticity, not compromise. When they saw him align with Ruto, they saw a leader who had finally become what he had long fought against. To them, Raila’s handshake was not reconciliation — it was capitulation.
The 2024 youth protests crystallized this tension. When millions of young Kenyans poured into the streets to resist bad governance, they expected Raila to stand with them. But he hesitated, calculating, cautious. That hesitation cost him the last of his credibility among the youth. They did not need a cautious elder; they needed a fearless mentor. His absence spoke louder than his decades of speeches. In the eyes of the young, Raila had abandoned them when it mattered most.
This broken relationship between Raila and the youth reflected a broader generational crisis in Kenya’s politics. The old guard viewed compromise as wisdom; the young saw it as weakness. Raila believed he could negotiate change from within the system, but the youth believed the system itself was the enemy. Their vision of a new Kenya clashed directly with his instinct for survival politics. That disconnect became irreversible after the handshake.
When history writes Raila’s epitaph, it will be torn between admiration and accusation. No one can erase his role in ending one-party rule, in constitutional reform, or in defending the rule of law. Yet, equally, no one can deny that his final political act alienated the very people who were supposed to carry his torch. His was a life of great victories and greater contradictions. His courage birthed a nation’s consciousness, but his compromises killed its hope.
For many Kenyans, Raila’s death feels like the end of an era — and a painful reminder of what could have been. He was supposed to mentor the next generation of reformers, to guide them past the traps he had fallen into. Instead, he chose proximity to power over partnership with the people. The youth who once called him Baba now bid farewell to a stranger. In their eyes, he died long before his physical death — the day he shook Ruto’s hand.
The political ecosystem is shaken because Raila was more than a politician; he was a myth, a movement, a memory. His death leaves a vacuum not just of leadership, but of faith. Even his critics admit that he was the moral barometer of Kenyan politics. Yet in the end, he struggled to measure up to his own ideals. The tragedy is not that he died; it is that he died misunderstood, estranged from the generation he inspired most.
Kenya today mourns not just the man, but the bond that was broken. Raila’s story is a cautionary tale about what happens when revolutionaries become comfortable. It is proof that even the purest ideals can be corroded by proximity to power. His death forces the nation to ask: Can one handshake undo decades of struggle? For the youth, the answer remains yes — painfully and permanently yes.
In death, Raila may yet achieve the unity he sought in life. Perhaps his passing will compel both his critics and supporters to re-examine what democracy truly means. But until then, the wounds of betrayal remain raw. The youth will grieve him, but they will not forget how he made them feel — abandoned. For them, Raila’s final chapter was not written in glory, but in silence and distance.
And yet, beyond the disappointment, there is still respect. The young know that Raila gave more of himself to Kenya than most ever will. His mistakes do not erase his courage; his missteps do not erase his mission. But they complicate it. They turn a hero into a human being — fallible, weary, and, in the end, tragically alone. The greatest tragedy of Raila Odinga’s life was not that he lost elections — it was that he lost his people’s trust before he died.
If he had lived to 2027, perhaps he could have made peace with the youth. Perhaps he could have stood before them and said, “I was wrong.” But fate denied him that redemption. His death freezes his legacy in the shadow of his last political mistake. The man who once defied presidents and prisons was ultimately defeated by the politics of comfort. It is a painful ending to a story that began with so much fire.
Still, Raila Odinga’s life remains a mirror to Kenya itself — brilliant yet broken, hopeful yet compromised, full of potential yet haunted by betrayal. His journey reminds us that revolutions do not die because of bullets, but because of bargains. And in that truth lies the lesson for the next generation: never let comfort kill conviction. Rest in peace, Jakom — the man who taught us to fight, and in the end, taught us why we must never stop.
Read Also: Kenya’s Former Prime Minister, Raila Odinga Is Dead
About Steve Biko Wafula
Steve Biko is the CEO OF Soko Directory and the founder of Hidalgo Group of Companies. Steve is currently developing his career in law, finance, entrepreneurship and digital consultancy; and has been implementing consultancy assignments for client organizations comprising of trainings besides capacity building in entrepreneurial matters.He can be reached on: +254 20 510 1124 or Email: info@sokodirectory.com
- January 2026 (220)
- February 2026 (243)
- March 2026 (97)
- January 2025 (119)
- February 2025 (191)
- March 2025 (212)
- April 2025 (193)
- May 2025 (161)
- June 2025 (157)
- July 2025 (227)
- August 2025 (211)
- September 2025 (270)
- October 2025 (297)
- November 2025 (230)
- December 2025 (219)
- January 2024 (238)
- February 2024 (227)
- March 2024 (190)
- April 2024 (133)
- May 2024 (157)
- June 2024 (145)
- July 2024 (136)
- August 2024 (154)
- September 2024 (212)
- October 2024 (255)
- November 2024 (196)
- December 2024 (143)
- January 2023 (182)
- February 2023 (203)
- March 2023 (322)
- April 2023 (297)
- May 2023 (267)
- June 2023 (214)
- July 2023 (212)
- August 2023 (257)
- September 2023 (237)
- October 2023 (264)
- November 2023 (286)
- December 2023 (177)
- January 2022 (293)
- February 2022 (329)
- March 2022 (358)
- April 2022 (292)
- May 2022 (271)
- June 2022 (232)
- July 2022 (278)
- August 2022 (253)
- September 2022 (246)
- October 2022 (196)
- November 2022 (232)
- December 2022 (167)
- January 2021 (182)
- February 2021 (227)
- March 2021 (325)
- April 2021 (259)
- May 2021 (285)
- June 2021 (272)
- July 2021 (277)
- August 2021 (232)
- September 2021 (271)
- October 2021 (304)
- November 2021 (364)
- December 2021 (249)
- January 2020 (272)
- February 2020 (310)
- March 2020 (390)
- April 2020 (321)
- May 2020 (335)
- June 2020 (327)
- July 2020 (333)
- August 2020 (276)
- September 2020 (214)
- October 2020 (233)
- November 2020 (242)
- December 2020 (187)
- January 2019 (251)
- February 2019 (215)
- March 2019 (283)
- April 2019 (254)
- May 2019 (269)
- June 2019 (249)
- July 2019 (335)
- August 2019 (293)
- September 2019 (306)
- October 2019 (313)
- November 2019 (362)
- December 2019 (318)
- January 2018 (291)
- February 2018 (213)
- March 2018 (275)
- April 2018 (223)
- May 2018 (235)
- June 2018 (176)
- July 2018 (256)
- August 2018 (247)
- September 2018 (255)
- October 2018 (282)
- November 2018 (282)
- December 2018 (184)
- January 2017 (183)
- February 2017 (194)
- March 2017 (207)
- April 2017 (104)
- May 2017 (169)
- June 2017 (205)
- July 2017 (189)
- August 2017 (195)
- September 2017 (186)
- October 2017 (235)
- November 2017 (253)
- December 2017 (266)
- January 2016 (164)
- February 2016 (165)
- March 2016 (189)
- April 2016 (143)
- May 2016 (245)
- June 2016 (182)
- July 2016 (271)
- August 2016 (247)
- September 2016 (233)
- October 2016 (191)
- November 2016 (243)
- December 2016 (153)
- January 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (164)
- April 2015 (107)
- May 2015 (116)
- June 2015 (119)
- July 2015 (145)
- August 2015 (157)
- September 2015 (186)
- October 2015 (169)
- November 2015 (173)
- December 2015 (205)
- March 2014 (2)
- March 2013 (10)
- June 2013 (1)
- March 2012 (7)
- April 2012 (15)
- May 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (2)
- December 2012 (1)
