Unmasking Sarai Group, Vicious Wolves In Sheep Skin

KEY POINTS
Who is the Sarai Group? Are they competent enough to run Mumias Sugar Company? Are they serious about clearing the debts and returning the machine back to its original roaring power? Do they have what it takes in terms of integrity, respect for human rights, and labor laws?
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Question is, are we going to give people who are not serious as to when they should pay farmers, former employees, and creditors to run Mumias Sugar Company? Are we going to allow people accused of mass eviction in the neighboring country to revive Mumias Sugar?
The darkness surrounding the bidding process around Mumias Sugar Company keeps on getting thicker.
As a recap, the bidders, New Mumias Sugar/ Devki Group had a total bid of 59.2 billion shillings while West Kenya Sugar placed a bid of 33.3 billion shillings. KE International had a total bid of 25.9 billion shillings while Kruman Finance placed a bid of 14.1 billion shillings.
At the same time, Pandal Industries had a total bid of 5.3 billion shillings followed by Kibos Sugar with a total bid of 3.7 billion shillings. Sarai Group had the lowest bid of 3.1 billion shillings.
Perhaps the largest controversy that surrounded the whole thing is how the lowest bidder and one who will take a whole 10 years to pay back debts was picked as the best to run the resurrection of Mumias Sugar Company.
As the controversy continues, the real victims of the whole thing are farmers whose money is still in the hands of Mumias Sugar Company after it collapsed without paying them; the employees who have stayed for years without their salaries; and the shareholders who wait daily to see their company back at the NSE.
But in all these, who are the Sarai Group? Are they competent enough to run Mumias Sugar Company? Are they serious about clearing the debts and returning the machine back to its original roaring power? Do they have what it takes in terms of integrity, respect for human rights, and labor laws? Do they even respect the environment?
Did you know that Sarai Group owns a company called Hoima Sugar Company Limited (HSCL) in Uganda? And do you know that this company has been accused of grabbing land belonging to over 40 poor families in Rwekobe and Rwembaho in Kabwoya Sub-County, Kikuube district? They mercilessly evicted people, grabbed their land, and planted sugarcane.
ALSO READ: 5 Promising Pathways for Enhancing Local Tourism in Kenya
In fact, it has been documented that, residents held demonstrations and stormed district offices demanding to know why Hoima Sugar Company was persecuting them and removing them from their ancestral land. The company claimed that it had the right to own the land for 99 years.
Hoima Sugar Company, owned by Sarai Group (let nobody lie to you that they are not related), did not stop there. They grabbed a whole forest, Bugoma, cleared it, and are planting sugarcane. Was it not for the protest of families around the forest and environmentalists, the whole forest, 22 square miles, would be sugarcane?
It seems they have no regard for human life. More than 1,000 families in the three sub-counties neighboring the Bugoma central forest reserve in Kikuube district are still living in fear that their ancestral land could be grabbed by the factory if the company wins the battle to destroy Bugoma forest reserve for sugarcane growing.
The residents are from the sub-counties of Kyangwali, Kabwoya and Kiziranfumbi. Over 30 villages are bordering the contested forest reserve. The villages are Nyairongo, Rwembaho, Rwenkobe, Sayuni, Kabegaramire, Muhangaizima, Nyambogo, Karokajengwa, Mukarehe, Katengeto, Burungi, Muyenga, Karukarungi and Kimaramu. Others are Sayinebe, Karodi, Buzibwera, Kitoma, Mukayembe, Nyakabale, Ndongo, Kasene, Nyaigugu, Nsozi, Kyarushesha, Kikonda, Kitooke, Kisonsomya, Nyakabale, Kyabasana, Bujongoro, Kyabayanja, Kisindi and Rwenkobe among others.
The sugar factory rented close to 22 square miles of the contested Bugoma central forest reserve land from the Bunyoro-Kitara Kingdom for sugarcane growing for 99 years and has insisted that the forest must be cleared for sugarcane to be planted.
The Group owns another Sugar Company called Kiryandongo Sugar Limited. This company too has been accused of grabbing land, part of the 2,400-hectare sugar cane plantation project where an estimated 35,000 people are in the process of being evicted to make way for the project and other two by other companies.
“They robbed us and evicted us with guns,” says 60-year-old Florence Nassaka, a resident in Canaan village who was evicted by Agilis Partners. “What kind of development did they bring? Do they give us some of that maize that you see there? Try walking into that maize farm and pick just one maize cob, see what will happen to you! It is only for the white man. The worst thing is that the authorities in Kiryandongo did not help us at all; they just ate the white man’s money and moved on.”
So, are we going to give people who are not serious as to when they should pay farmers, former employees, and creditors to run Mumias Sugar Company? Are we going to allow people accused of mass eviction in the neighboring country to revive Mumias Sugar?
About Juma
Juma is an enthusiastic journalist who believes that journalism has power to change the world either negatively or positively depending on how one uses it.(020) 528 0222 or Email: info@sokodirectory.com
- January 2025 (119)
- February 2025 (191)
- March 2025 (212)
- April 2025 (193)
- May 2025 (161)
- June 2025 (157)
- July 2025 (227)
- August 2025 (211)
- September 2025 (270)
- October 2025 (297)
- November 2025 (177)
- January 2024 (238)
- February 2024 (227)
- March 2024 (190)
- April 2024 (133)
- May 2024 (157)
- June 2024 (145)
- July 2024 (136)
- August 2024 (154)
- September 2024 (212)
- October 2024 (255)
- November 2024 (196)
- December 2024 (143)
- January 2023 (182)
- February 2023 (203)
- March 2023 (322)
- April 2023 (297)
- May 2023 (267)
- June 2023 (214)
- July 2023 (212)
- August 2023 (257)
- September 2023 (237)
- October 2023 (264)
- November 2023 (286)
- December 2023 (177)
- January 2022 (293)
- February 2022 (329)
- March 2022 (358)
- April 2022 (292)
- May 2022 (271)
- June 2022 (232)
- July 2022 (278)
- August 2022 (253)
- September 2022 (246)
- October 2022 (196)
- November 2022 (232)
- December 2022 (167)
- January 2021 (182)
- February 2021 (227)
- March 2021 (325)
- April 2021 (259)
- May 2021 (285)
- June 2021 (272)
- July 2021 (277)
- August 2021 (232)
- September 2021 (271)
- October 2021 (304)
- November 2021 (364)
- December 2021 (249)
- January 2020 (272)
- February 2020 (310)
- March 2020 (390)
- April 2020 (321)
- May 2020 (335)
- June 2020 (327)
- July 2020 (333)
- August 2020 (276)
- September 2020 (214)
- October 2020 (233)
- November 2020 (242)
- December 2020 (187)
- January 2019 (251)
- February 2019 (215)
- March 2019 (283)
- April 2019 (254)
- May 2019 (269)
- June 2019 (249)
- July 2019 (335)
- August 2019 (293)
- September 2019 (306)
- October 2019 (313)
- November 2019 (362)
- December 2019 (318)
- January 2018 (291)
- February 2018 (213)
- March 2018 (275)
- April 2018 (223)
- May 2018 (235)
- June 2018 (176)
- July 2018 (256)
- August 2018 (247)
- September 2018 (255)
- October 2018 (282)
- November 2018 (282)
- December 2018 (184)
- January 2017 (183)
- February 2017 (194)
- March 2017 (207)
- April 2017 (104)
- May 2017 (169)
- June 2017 (205)
- July 2017 (189)
- August 2017 (195)
- September 2017 (186)
- October 2017 (235)
- November 2017 (253)
- December 2017 (266)
- January 2016 (164)
- February 2016 (165)
- March 2016 (189)
- April 2016 (143)
- May 2016 (245)
- June 2016 (182)
- July 2016 (271)
- August 2016 (247)
- September 2016 (233)
- October 2016 (191)
- November 2016 (243)
- December 2016 (153)
- January 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (164)
- April 2015 (107)
- May 2015 (116)
- June 2015 (119)
- July 2015 (145)
- August 2015 (157)
- September 2015 (186)
- October 2015 (169)
- November 2015 (173)
- December 2015 (205)
- March 2014 (2)
- March 2013 (10)
- June 2013 (1)
- March 2012 (7)
- April 2012 (15)
- May 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (2)
- December 2012 (1)
