Cytonn Investments’ H1’2015 Banking Report

By / Published September 14, 2015 | 8:24 am





Following the release of the H1’2015 results by banks, Cytonn Investments carried out an analysis on Kenya’s banking sector to decipher any material changes from our Q1’2015 banking report. The aim of the analysis is to answer the question: from an equity investor point of view, which is the most attractive listed bank to invest in for the long-term?

In Kenya there are a total of 42 commercial banks, 12 microfinance banks and 1 mortgage finance institution. The Central Bank of Kenya regulates all banks. The Capital Markets Authority has additional oversight over the listed banks, which are 11 in number.

As at H1’ 2015, the banking sector recorded a slow-down in growth, growing at 8.3% compared to 15.6% in 2014, with the slowdown being attributed to poor economic performance on the back of increased non performing loans and the uncertainty in the interest rate environment. On the PAT y/y growth, National Bank of Kenya (NBK) and Co-operative bank registered the highest growth of 123.0% and 32.3%, respectively. NBK’s growth was due to a robust growth in non-funded income of 227%, driven mainly by sale of property.

Net Interest Income (NII) grew by 18.8%, supported by a 30.6% growth in the loan book and 6.4% increase in deposits. Co-operative Bank’s performance was driven by a 19% y/y growth in NII, to Kshs. 11.8 bn from Kshs. 9.9 bn in H1’2014. Total operating expenses declined by 4% y/y to Kshs. 9.0 bn, bringing the cost to income ratio (CIR) to 47%, from 59% in H1’2014.

CfC Stanbic and Standard Chartered registered the largest declines of 42% and 36%, respectively. CfC’s decline was largely attributed to a decline in non-funded income (NFI), which declined by 33% y/y to Kshs. 3.3 bn thereby diluting the effect of the 2.0% increase in net interest income (NII). Standard Chartered banks results were weighed down by a 51.2% increase in loan loss provisions. NII declined a marginal 0.1% y/y, while NFI fell by 31.2% y/y on account of a one off Kshs. 1.2 bn gain last year owing to the bank’s sale of property

On the operating environment, increases in the Kenya Banker’s Reference Rate by 133 bps to 9.87% has resulted in an upward repricing of loans, raising the risk that more loans issued might fall into a non-performing territory. Discussions with various bank management teams indicate that a further increase of 300 bps in the KBRR will see a negative impact on the NPLs in the industry.

Other challenges in the banking industry include the Consumer Protection Act, that allows customers to prepay their loans and not be subject to a charge, and the Banking Act that allows customers who had placed term deposits to recall them before maturity and only be charged the foregone interest payment. This has affected commercial bank’s asset liability matching, and poses further risks in the medium term.

Some of the developments in the banking sector include:

Increase in interest rates: The KBRR increased by 133 bps to 9.87% largely as a result of an increase in the CBR by 300 bps to 11.5%. This will raise interest on all loans pegged on the KBRR;
Lower earnings growth: Banks recorded the slowest year on year growth in 6 years of 8.3% during H1’2015, as compared to 15.6% in H1’ 2014;
Core Capital: Rejection of increase in Core Capital Requirements to Kshs. 5 bn as proposed in the 2015/2016 Budget, which would have seen 20 commercial banks make shareholders’ cash calls, merge or sell equity stakes to comply with the law. Parliament rejected the proposal to increase core capital in banks to Kshs. 5 bn by 2018;
Dubai Bank Liquidation: Dubai bank was placed under receivership with the Kenya Deposit Insurance Corporation (KDIC) for failure to meet statutory requirements since July and for failure to honour a Kshs. 48.2 mn financial obligation due to Bank of Africa. The KDIC further recommended that the bank be liquidated.
Cytonn Investments’ banking report examines the health and future expected performance of the bank, by looking at metrics for profitability, efficiency, growth, asset quality, liquidity, revenue diversification, capitalization and intrinsic valuation. In total, we looked at 13 different metrics to rank the banks.

 

It is notable that CFC Stanbic registered the biggest ranking deterioration in the H1’2015 Cytonn Banking Report. The bank declined from Rank #1 in Q1’2015 to Rank #8 in H1’2015 because of a high cost to income ratio of 60.0% vs. an industry average of 48.1%, and low net interest margin of 5.3% vs. an industry average of 8.3%.


An excerpt of the Cytonn Banking Report

 







More Articles From This Author






Trending Stories










Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE



ARCHIVES

2021
  • January 2021 (182)
  • February 2021 (227)
  • March 2021 (325)
  • April 2021 (261)
  • May 2021 (72)
  • 2020
  • January 2020 (272)
  • February 2020 (310)
  • March 2020 (390)
  • April 2020 (321)
  • May 2020 (335)
  • June 2020 (327)
  • July 2020 (334)
  • August 2020 (276)
  • September 2020 (214)
  • October 2020 (233)
  • November 2020 (242)
  • December 2020 (187)
  • 2019
  • January 2019 (253)
  • February 2019 (216)
  • March 2019 (285)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (272)
  • June 2019 (251)
  • July 2019 (338)
  • August 2019 (293)
  • September 2019 (306)
  • October 2019 (313)
  • November 2019 (362)
  • December 2019 (319)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (213)
  • March 2018 (278)
  • April 2018 (225)
  • May 2018 (237)
  • June 2018 (178)
  • July 2018 (256)
  • August 2018 (249)
  • September 2018 (256)
  • October 2018 (287)
  • November 2018 (284)
  • December 2018 (186)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (194)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (205)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (165)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (190)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (245)
  • June 2016 (182)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (248)
  • September 2016 (234)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (166)
  • April 2015 (108)
  • May 2015 (116)
  • June 2015 (120)
  • July 2015 (148)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (188)
  • October 2015 (169)
  • November 2015 (173)
  • December 2015 (207)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950