Ministry Land Grabbing Is Reversing The Purpose Of 2010 Constitution

By Soko Directory Team / Published February 28, 2020 | 1:57 pm





A land grab can be disguised as legitimate when a government gazettement is used to throw some veil of due process over the stealing. But as our Ministry of Lands and county governments conspire to rob our poorest peoples of their lands, no veil can disguise the use of sovereign power – by the people’s own chosen trustees – to rob them of what is rightfully theirs.

And so it is with Isiolo and its land.

As it is, land rights have been at the heart of Kenya’s inflamed degree of resource and ethnic conflict, which is why we have poured huge legislative effort into resolving our historical land ‘wrongs’.

Yet our Ministry of Lands seems to have failed to grasp its central role in now applying our new laws to create a fairer, stronger and more united nation.

Following our constitution 2010, we created a new land law and established an adjudication procedure for disputed lands. We then created a separate law for community lands, and there was a reason: for most community land had no registered owner – it had been lived on by our pastoral communities, owned by no other, but never registered.

So, by 2016, we had created the Community Lands Act to put in place the systems and procedures to register community land to its rightful owners, the local communities.

It took until 2018 to promulgate the regulations to operationalize the law. And then began the process of mapping our unregistered community land, and registering it. This, by law, was to have involved two processes. From September 2018 and for one year the Ministry of Lands was charged with educating the public on the new law and raising public awareness. It never did.

At the same time, county governments had until April 2019 to produce an inventory of all their community lands. Not all of the 24 counties with community lands met that deadline, but some of them did, and Isiolo was one of them.

The Ministry of Lands, however, then did not do its part, once again. By the end of August, last year, the ministry was supposed to have processed the inventories and begun the registration process for the identified community lands.

Instead, the Cabinet Secretary for Lands and Physical Planning took a very different path and on 3rd September last year issued legal notice 150 moving Isiolo’s community lands out of the process defined by the Community Land Act, and over into the Lands Adjudication Act process instead.

In a single step, the Community Land Act, which the ministry had never educated anyone on, was effectively nulled.

In fact, the breach of law was greater still. The ministry announced that large tracts of the Isiolo community land would not be adjudicated at all, and instead simply claimed them for the government, without compensation, and without any process whatsoever.

We call that land grabbing. The land did not belong to the government, not to the army for an army base, and not to any other arm of government, without having gone through a normal process of government acquisition and compensation to the actual landowners – being the pastoral communities.

The county government supported the abandonment of the community lands process. Yet it had proceeded to the last stage of registration. But maybe it was just too tempting to take the land from pastoralists without compensation, versus stealing land tracts elsewhere where compensation would be obligatory.

However, when it gets to the point – after violence, deaths, displacement, years of trauma – that our lands ministry has no qualms whatsoever in grabbing untitled land without compensation, one has to question what it actually takes to get a lands ministry that observes and applies the land laws.

Certainly, it’s a depressing reflection of our ethical foundation when our ministry cannot grasp the rationale, basis or legality of the Community Lands Act 2016, but that it does not even recognize its application or existence at all is beyond unethical: it strikes at the heart of our constitution and at our capacity and integrity as a government and as a nation-state.

The Community Land Act does exist, and no reason or exception was ever made in applying it. And the lands ministry should be held accountable. Isiolo’s community land registration needs to proceed as defined in law, with the government having the honor and respect for community rights to compensate the community for any land it would like to own.

We do not live in a new republic where we pick and choose the laws we want to apply as cabinet secretaries or as parliamentarians. We live in a republic that is bound by the laws it makes and bound to apply them.

The author is KANU-nominated Senator Abshiro Halake





About Soko Directory Team

Soko Directory is a Financial and Markets digital portal that tracks brands, listed firms on the NSE, SMEs and trend setters in the markets eco-system.Find us on Facebook: facebook.com/SokoDirectory and on Twitter: twitter.com/SokoDirectory

View other posts by Soko Directory Team


More Articles From This Author








Trending Stories










Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE



ARCHIVES

2021
  • January 2021 (182)
  • February 2021 (227)
  • March 2021 (325)
  • April 2021 (260)
  • May 2021 (285)
  • June 2021 (274)
  • July 2021 (233)
  • 2020
  • January 2020 (272)
  • February 2020 (310)
  • March 2020 (390)
  • April 2020 (321)
  • May 2020 (335)
  • June 2020 (327)
  • July 2020 (334)
  • August 2020 (276)
  • September 2020 (214)
  • October 2020 (233)
  • November 2020 (242)
  • December 2020 (187)
  • 2019
  • January 2019 (253)
  • February 2019 (216)
  • March 2019 (285)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (272)
  • June 2019 (251)
  • July 2019 (338)
  • August 2019 (293)
  • September 2019 (306)
  • October 2019 (313)
  • November 2019 (362)
  • December 2019 (319)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (213)
  • March 2018 (278)
  • April 2018 (225)
  • May 2018 (237)
  • June 2018 (178)
  • July 2018 (256)
  • August 2018 (249)
  • September 2018 (256)
  • October 2018 (287)
  • November 2018 (284)
  • December 2018 (186)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (194)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (205)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (165)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (190)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (245)
  • June 2016 (182)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (248)
  • September 2016 (234)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (166)
  • April 2015 (108)
  • May 2015 (116)
  • June 2015 (120)
  • July 2015 (148)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (188)
  • October 2015 (169)
  • November 2015 (173)
  • December 2015 (207)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950