How Technology Will Change Fertility in Africa

By Korir Isaac / Published January 24, 2022 | 11:43 am




KEY POINTS

Today, the market is largely built around a single cycle of IVF. In the future, technology will be able to price risk and deliver packaged solutions with 80 percent or greater probability of success, and by opening up the capital markets for this asset class.


fertility technology Microscope and optical equipment in the laboratory of the artificial insemination clinic. The invention of the vaccine, IVF. Tests, fertilization of the egg.

KEY TAKEAWAYS


Telemedicine will help replace clinic visits when and where possible, reducing cost and creating greater access.


In Kenya, the birth rates have dipped to an all-time low in the past decade. In 2021, the birth rate in the country was 27.976 births per 1000 people, a 1.1 percent decline from 2020.

More than anything else, this is reflective of a timing shift, with more first-time mothers giving birth in their 30s or 40s rather than in their 20s or teens. This timing shift is driving demand for fertility treatments such as In Vitro Fertilization (IVF), IUI, and egg vitrification, and if these treatments can deliver, the birth rate will rise again.

However, today, fertility treatments still have a success rate of below 50 percent globally, and on average, it only accounts for 2 percent of live births. So, the big question remains: How will the industry scale?

This is where fertility treatment technology comes into the picture. Here are the three major ways in which tech will change and improve fertility care.

  • Creating Access

In general, there are soft and hard costs that impede access to fertility care.

The soft costs include the huge amount of time it takes to research and find solutions and plan for a clinic visit, not to mention the hours spent managing one’s own treatment.

ALSO READ: An Elephant Gives Birth To Twins At Amboseli

Then there are the hard costs. In Kenya, an average IVF cycle can be around Kes 600,000 and, for most, is an out-of-pocket expense rarely covered by insurance.

Tech will address the soft costs by lowering barriers that impede information dissemination, including but not limited to digital consults, tests you can order online that negate a clinic visit, and automated booking systems into clinics for treatment. These services will reduce friction to getting fertility care.

Telemedicine will help replace clinic visits when and where possible, reducing cost and creating greater access.

In view of the hard costs, financial innovation will be helpful. There are already a number of insurance companies including the government’s National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) that are reworking their policies to cover fertility treatment as well as fertility loan solutions from financial companies.

These will give way to more customized and innovative financial products for fertility treatment as the industry grows up.

By addressing the complexity and cost barriers, the tech will open up basic access to fertility care.

  • Better Experience

Like in many other fields, the promise of tech in healthcare is a better user experience, both figuratively and literally. Technology can provide personalized care, convenience, and around-the-clock support.

Traditional healthcare is highly impersonal and mostly self-managed outside of the doctor’s office, including administration and medication. With digital consult and telehealth, patients can experience connected, on-demand support from within the app of their choice. They can access their personal fertility information, profile, and medical history all in one place.

Partners such as fertility experts, embryologists, pharmacists, and even insurance companies will be able to share information and connect their information to create a holistic support hub. Patients will even be empowered with medication tracking and reminders to ensure they’re following their fertility treatment plans, improving efficacy.

  • Driving Outcomes

Largely, the most important way tech will change fertility is by affecting outcomes.

Big data is changing everything including fertility. It will allow fertility experts to crunch the numbers to predict which protocols would work best for patients. A host of such factors would include an individual’s personal fertility profile, including health history, age, and ethnicity among others.

Data analytics will also improve clinical decisions. Big data will be used to train algorithms to improve the timing of procedures such as egg retrieval and the selection and implantation of embryos.

Today, the market is largely built around a single cycle of IVF. In the future, tech will be able to price risk and deliver packaged solutions with 80 percent or greater probability of success, and by opening up the capital markets for this asset class, these packages can be accessed at monthly rates that will still be affordable to the average consumer.

And that is how tech will turn around the downward trend in birth rates.

 




About Korir Isaac

A creative, tenacious, and passionate journalist with impeccable ethics and a nose for anticipated and spontaneous news. He may not say it, but he sure can make one hell of a story.

View other posts by Korir Isaac


More Articles From This Author








Trending Stories










Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE



ARCHIVES

2022
  • January 2022 (294)
  • February 2022 (329)
  • March 2022 (361)
  • April 2022 (294)
  • May 2022 (206)
  • 2021
  • January 2021 (182)
  • February 2021 (227)
  • March 2021 (325)
  • April 2021 (259)
  • May 2021 (285)
  • June 2021 (273)
  • July 2021 (277)
  • August 2021 (232)
  • September 2021 (271)
  • October 2021 (305)
  • November 2021 (364)
  • December 2021 (250)
  • 2020
  • January 2020 (272)
  • February 2020 (310)
  • March 2020 (390)
  • April 2020 (321)
  • May 2020 (335)
  • June 2020 (327)
  • July 2020 (333)
  • August 2020 (276)
  • September 2020 (214)
  • October 2020 (233)
  • November 2020 (242)
  • December 2020 (187)
  • 2019
  • January 2019 (251)
  • February 2019 (215)
  • March 2019 (283)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (269)
  • June 2019 (250)
  • July 2019 (337)
  • August 2019 (293)
  • September 2019 (306)
  • October 2019 (313)
  • November 2019 (362)
  • December 2019 (318)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (213)
  • March 2018 (275)
  • April 2018 (223)
  • May 2018 (235)
  • June 2018 (176)
  • July 2018 (256)
  • August 2018 (247)
  • September 2018 (255)
  • October 2018 (282)
  • November 2018 (282)
  • December 2018 (184)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (194)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (205)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (164)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (189)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (245)
  • June 2016 (182)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (247)
  • September 2016 (233)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (164)
  • April 2015 (107)
  • May 2015 (116)
  • June 2015 (119)
  • July 2015 (145)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (186)
  • October 2015 (169)
  • November 2015 (173)
  • December 2015 (205)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950