The Truth About The University Funding Model: Ruto’s Plan To Segregate The Rich From The Poor Using Education

The recent unveiling of the Kenyan government’s new university funding model marks a pivotal moment in the nation’s educational landscape, one that threatens to exacerbate existing socio-economic disparities. This policy, rather than being a beacon of hope for the millions of young Kenyans striving for higher education, appears to be a calculated mechanism to segregate the rich and the poor, effectively making higher education a preserve of the wealthy.
I have had the chance to research and talk to education experts and financial analysts on the funding model and I would like to elucidate the grave implications of this funding model, arguing that it is both unconstitutional and socially unjust. Moreover, I would like to call for a united front among university students to demand the immediate reversal of this policy, the removal of their failed leadership, and ultimately, the ousting of a government that is complicit in killing the dreams of its youth.
A Policy of Segregation
The crux of the new funding model lies in its stratification of students into bands based on their financial needs, with government scholarships decreasing as household contributions increase. For instance, in Band 1, students receive a 70% scholarship, leaving them to cover 5% of their educational costs. While this may seem reasonable on the surface, the reality is that even this modest 5%—amounting to KES 30,600 for a medical student—is an insurmountable hurdle for many families already struggling with the high cost of living. As one moves to Band 5, the situation becomes even more dire, with students and their families expected to shoulder up to 40% of the total costs. This sliding scale effectively bars students from lower-income families from accessing higher education, relegating them to a future of limited opportunities.
Constitutional Violations
The Kenyan Constitution guarantees the right to education for all citizens. Article 43(1)(f) states that every person has the right to education, while Article 55 obligates the state to take measures to ensure that the youth have access to relevant education and training. By implementing a funding model that disproportionately burdens the poor, the government is in direct violation of these constitutional provisions. It is engaging in an act of systemic segregation that will have long-lasting repercussions on the socioeconomic fabric of the nation. Education should be the great equalizer, not a tool for entrenching inequality.
The Moral Failure of Leadership
In the face of this grave injustice, the silence of the university students’ leadership is both deafening and damning. These leaders, entrusted with the responsibility of safeguarding the interests of their peers, have failed spectacularly. Rather than galvanizing students to challenge this oppressive policy, they have remained passive, perhaps complicit in their inaction. This failure to act is a betrayal of the very students they are meant to represent. These leaders must be held accountable and removed from their positions to pave the way for a new cadre of student activists who are willing to fight for the rights of all students, not just those who can afford to pay their way.
A Call to Action
The time has come for university students across Kenya to rise and demand justice. This is not merely a fight for affordable education; it is a fight for the soul of the nation. If this policy is allowed to stand, it will create a generation of disenfranchised youth, unable to access the education they need to improve their lives and contribute to the nation’s development. Students must unite, organize, and take to the streets in peaceful protest. They must make it clear to the government that they will not stand idly by while their futures are being stolen from them.
Learning from Global Success
Looking beyond our borders, we find examples of countries that have successfully implemented equitable education systems. In Finland, for example, education is free at all levels, including university. The Finnish government recognizes that education is not merely a service to be sold, but a fundamental right that should be accessible to all, regardless of socio-economic background. This model has yielded impressive results, with Finland consistently ranking among the top countries in global education assessments. The Kenyan government must take a leaf from Finland’s book and recognize that investing in education is investing in the future.
The Cost of Corruption
Kenya is a nation rich in resources, both natural and human, yet it remains shackled by the chains of corruption. Every year, billions of shillings are siphoned off from public coffers by corrupt officials. This money, if properly managed, could easily fund free education from baby class to university. The notion that Kenya cannot afford to provide free education is a fallacy; it is not a question of resources but of priorities. If the government were serious about uplifting the nation, it would tackle corruption head-on and redirect these stolen funds into the education sector.
Budgeting for the Future
A reallocation of funds is not only possible but necessary. The government must prioritize education in its budget, cutting back on non-essential expenditures and redirecting those funds to ensure that all Kenyan children have access to free, quality education. This is not an impossible task; it simply requires the political will to act in the best interests of the nation. The current administration, however, seems more interested in maintaining the status quo than in making the bold decisions needed to secure Kenya’s future.
Ruto’s Misguided Leadership
President William Ruto, who campaigned on a platform of empowering the youth, has shown through this policy that his promises were nothing more than empty rhetoric. Rather than championing the cause of education, he has implemented a policy that will kill the dreams of countless young Kenyans. This is not just a policy failure; it is a moral failing of the highest order. Ruto has demonstrated that he is not a leader for the people, but a politician who is willing to sacrifice the future of the nation’s youth for the sake of political expediency.
The Consequences of Inaction
If this funding model is allowed to continue, the consequences will be dire. Kenya will see an increase in the number of young people unable to access higher education, leading to a rise in unemployment, poverty, and social unrest. The dream of a prosperous, equitable Kenya will be nothing more than a distant mirage. The government’s failure to provide for its youth is not just a policy failure; it is an abdication of its most basic responsibilities.
The Path Forward
The solution to this crisis is clear: the government must immediately repeal the new funding model and replace it with a system that guarantees access to higher education for all, regardless of socio-economic background. This will require significant investment in the education sector, but it is an investment that will pay dividends for generations to come. The government must also address the root causes of its budgetary shortfalls, namely corruption, and ensure that public funds are used for the public good.
Student Unity as a Catalyst for Change
For this change to occur, students must play a central role. They must reject the failed leadership that has allowed this policy to take root and elect new leaders who are committed to fighting for their rights. They must also build alliances with other stakeholders, including parents, educators, and civil society organizations, to form a united front against this injustice. It is only through collective action that they will be able to effect meaningful change.
Read Also: Ruto’s Litany of Failures: Why Kenya Must Invoke Article 1 For His Resignation
The Power of Protest
Peaceful protest has a long and successful history as a tool for social change. From the civil rights movement in the United States to the anti-apartheid struggle in South Africa, history shows that when people unite and stand up against injustice, they can achieve the impossible. Kenyan students must draw on this legacy of resistance and use their voices to demand the education they deserve.
Kenya stands at a crossroads. The government’s new university funding model is not just a policy misstep—it is a deliberate attempt to widen the gap between the rich and the poor, disenfranchise the youth, and perpetuate a cycle of inequality that will haunt the nation for generations. This model is a direct affront to the constitutional rights of Kenyan citizens and a betrayal of the promises made by those in power. It is a clear indication that the current administration, led by President William Ruto, is not committed to the welfare of the nation’s youth but is instead driven by an agenda that undermines their future.
The stakes could not be higher. If this policy is allowed to stand, it will set a dangerous precedent, one that could see education increasingly privatized and accessible only to those who can afford it. This would be a tragedy not only for the individual students affected but for the country as a whole, which would suffer from the loss of potential, innovation, and progress that comes from a well-educated populace.
The solution lies in the hands of the students and the broader public. University students across the country must rise, not with violence, but with the power of their collective voice. They must demand that this government, which has shown itself to be out of touch with the needs of its people, either changes course or faces removal from office. They must also call for the immediate resignation of the current student leadership, whose failure to act is an unacceptable dereliction of duty.
Moreover, this moment must catalyze a broader discussion about the role of education in Kenyan society and the steps that must be taken to ensure that it is accessible to all. This includes a serious commitment to tackling corruption, reallocating resources, and learning from global best practices in education.
Kenya has the potential to offer free, quality education from the earliest years through to university, but this requires visionary leadership and a commitment to justice. The youth of Kenya are not just the leaders of tomorrow—they are the citizens of today, and they must not be denied the opportunities they need to succeed. It is time to take a stand, demand accountability, and ensure that the dreams of Kenya’s children are not sacrificed on the altar of political expediency.
The future of the nation depends on it.
About Steve Biko Wafula
Steve Biko is the CEO OF Soko Directory and the founder of Hidalgo Group of Companies. Steve is currently developing his career in law, finance, entrepreneurship and digital consultancy; and has been implementing consultancy assignments for client organizations comprising of trainings besides capacity building in entrepreneurial matters.He can be reached on: +254 20 510 1124 or Email: info@sokodirectory.com
- January 2025 (119)
- February 2025 (191)
- March 2025 (212)
- April 2025 (193)
- May 2025 (161)
- June 2025 (157)
- July 2025 (59)
- January 2024 (238)
- February 2024 (227)
- March 2024 (190)
- April 2024 (133)
- May 2024 (157)
- June 2024 (145)
- July 2024 (136)
- August 2024 (154)
- September 2024 (212)
- October 2024 (255)
- November 2024 (196)
- December 2024 (143)
- January 2023 (182)
- February 2023 (203)
- March 2023 (322)
- April 2023 (297)
- May 2023 (267)
- June 2023 (214)
- July 2023 (212)
- August 2023 (257)
- September 2023 (237)
- October 2023 (264)
- November 2023 (286)
- December 2023 (177)
- January 2022 (293)
- February 2022 (329)
- March 2022 (358)
- April 2022 (292)
- May 2022 (271)
- June 2022 (232)
- July 2022 (278)
- August 2022 (253)
- September 2022 (246)
- October 2022 (196)
- November 2022 (232)
- December 2022 (167)
- January 2021 (182)
- February 2021 (227)
- March 2021 (325)
- April 2021 (259)
- May 2021 (285)
- June 2021 (272)
- July 2021 (277)
- August 2021 (232)
- September 2021 (271)
- October 2021 (304)
- November 2021 (364)
- December 2021 (249)
- January 2020 (272)
- February 2020 (310)
- March 2020 (390)
- April 2020 (321)
- May 2020 (335)
- June 2020 (327)
- July 2020 (333)
- August 2020 (276)
- September 2020 (214)
- October 2020 (233)
- November 2020 (242)
- December 2020 (187)
- January 2019 (251)
- February 2019 (215)
- March 2019 (283)
- April 2019 (254)
- May 2019 (269)
- June 2019 (249)
- July 2019 (335)
- August 2019 (293)
- September 2019 (306)
- October 2019 (313)
- November 2019 (362)
- December 2019 (318)
- January 2018 (291)
- February 2018 (213)
- March 2018 (275)
- April 2018 (223)
- May 2018 (235)
- June 2018 (176)
- July 2018 (256)
- August 2018 (247)
- September 2018 (255)
- October 2018 (282)
- November 2018 (282)
- December 2018 (184)
- January 2017 (183)
- February 2017 (194)
- March 2017 (207)
- April 2017 (104)
- May 2017 (169)
- June 2017 (205)
- July 2017 (189)
- August 2017 (195)
- September 2017 (186)
- October 2017 (235)
- November 2017 (253)
- December 2017 (266)
- January 2016 (164)
- February 2016 (165)
- March 2016 (189)
- April 2016 (143)
- May 2016 (245)
- June 2016 (182)
- July 2016 (271)
- August 2016 (247)
- September 2016 (233)
- October 2016 (191)
- November 2016 (243)
- December 2016 (153)
- January 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (164)
- April 2015 (107)
- May 2015 (116)
- June 2015 (119)
- July 2015 (145)
- August 2015 (157)
- September 2015 (186)
- October 2015 (169)
- November 2015 (173)
- December 2015 (205)
- March 2014 (2)
- March 2013 (10)
- June 2013 (1)
- March 2012 (7)
- April 2012 (15)
- May 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (2)
- December 2012 (1)