Is Tanzania’s Maritime Silk Road China’s Strategy Or Sovereignty Trade-Off?

The arrival of China’s Maritime Silk Road (MSR) in Tanzania introduces complex layers of economic promise and questions around sovereignty. The MSR, a key segment of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), is rapidly reshaping the global maritime economy. Driven by the Shekou Model 4.0, the MSR is a blend of port, industrial park, and city development that epitomizes the ambition to intertwine Chinese economic influence with host countries’ maritime and economic lifelines. In Tanzania, the construction of state-of-the-art port facilities in Dar es Salaam and the recently revived Bagamoyo port project could, on one hand, uplift local economies; on the other, they present a conundrum: is Tanzania sacrificing its sovereignty for economic gain?

China Merchants, a Chinese state-owned conglomerate, has crafted this Port-Park-City model with precision, creating infrastructure solutions that integrate industrial and logistical hubs. As a result, Tanzania’s coastline is set to host a quasi-replica of Chinese ports and supporting industrial complexes, reflecting an almost surreal image of the Shekou model’s home base. The intent seems unmistakable – to deepen economic dependencies while securing maritime trade routes. This approach grants the People’s Republic of China (PRC) substantial leverage over regions like East Africa, positioning Tanzania as a crucial link in the MSR and a gateway to Africa’s eastern seaboard.

Unlike most African countries, Tanzania finds itself among the select few given such significant infrastructure under the MSR framework. Why Tanzania? Its geographical position as a natural entry point to East Africa and the Great Lakes region, along with its political pivot toward more international engagements, is appealing for China’s strategic ambitions. The MSR solidifies Tanzania’s position within China’s global supply chain, offering China control over maritime routes critical for energy and trade security.

Read Also: PRC Influence in Tanzania: A Deep Dive into Ambassador Chen Mingyang’s Role And Security Impact

Yet, this rapid port construction prompts more probing questions. Is China’s investment solely economic, or does it harbor intentions to monopolize Tanzania’s blue economy? The blue economy – encompassing fisheries, marine tourism, and coastal infrastructure – remains a linchpin in East Africa’s development. By establishing a comprehensive infrastructure network, the PRC appears to be investing not just in ports but in control mechanisms that could dictate Tanzania’s future in marine industries. More so, with provisions allowing the PRC to bring its own staff and labor, the labor benefits to Tanzania are limited, leaving locals sidelined as spectators in their own economy.

Analyzing China Harbour Engineering Company (CHEC)’s involvement in the Dar es Salaam and Bagamoyo ports reveals consistent patterns in MSR agreements. Under such agreements, China ensures exclusive rights and control over port operations, extending their control beyond mere construction into long-term governance. This arrangement leaves Tanzania at a potential disadvantage, as control of such critical infrastructure could enable PRC to exert outsized influence on local trade and maritime security policies. In essence, China’s strategic footprint on Tanzania’s coastline could outlast the projects themselves, forming a lingering economic dependency and raising concerns about a creeping erosion of sovereignty.

The question of land ownership complicates matters further. While nominally Tanzanian, the port lands may soon feel more like extensions of Chinese territory. By structuring agreements that potentially prioritize Chinese interests, Tanzania may be committing to long-term trade-offs that could impact its governance autonomy. In the global scramble for resource-rich territories, the MSR appears to offer China both a foothold and leverage, placing Tanzania’s resources at China’s disposal in ways that might be irreversible.

The resurgence of the Bagamoyo project is particularly striking. This port, once dismissed by late President Magufuli due to concerns about China’s overreach and stringent terms, is now back under consideration by President Suluhu’s administration. Magufuli’s hesitations stemmed from the stringent conditions, such as the 99-year lease demand, limited Tanzanian oversight, and clauses preventing other nations from investing in or using the port. For a nation with dreams of economic sovereignty, these terms could ring alarm bells. However, President Suluhu’s interest in revisiting Bagamoyo indicates a balancing act between potential economic growth and the risks of overreliance on foreign partners, specifically those with substantial geopolitical stakes.

Furthermore, the MSR’s Port-Park-City model is a masterstroke in economic integration but also hints at a potential strategy for labor control. By negotiating clauses to employ Chinese nationals on Tanzanian soil, the PRC effectively creates enclaves of influence while bypassing local labor markets. This approach diminishes opportunities for Tanzanian workers, creating instead a parallel labor system. To some observers, it may seem as though Tanzania is a pawn in a larger play, facilitating China’s strategy of labor redistribution while benefiting minimally from employment creation.

The environmental impact is another consideration. Industrial port complexes often contribute to illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing, as foreign entities exploit local marine resources. Tanzania’s rich coastline is vulnerable to IUU fishing, which jeopardizes not only marine biodiversity but also local fishing communities’ livelihoods. The MSR could indirectly worsen IUU activity by attracting high-intensity fishing fleets and increasing maritime traffic, making it harder for Tanzanian authorities to monitor and control such activities.

Beyond environmental concerns, the Shekou model’s implications for East Africa’s broader stability are worth scrutinizing. With each port constructed, China gains a strategic position in a sensitive geopolitical zone, one marked by competition among global powers. If the MSR’s footprint becomes synonymous with economic colonization, the resultant tension could reshape regional alignments, with nations potentially divided along lines of allegiance and dependency on Chinese infrastructure.

In this scenario, Tanzania’s position may resemble that of a satellite state, with the PRC holding substantial sway over economic decisions. The MSR’s demands on Tanzania’s territorial concessions raise questions about whether the PRC’s strategic expansion could lead to significant geopolitical shifts, perhaps even creating a ‘Chinese’ coastline in East Africa. Such a scenario may not entail formal sovereignty but would establish an undeniable PRC influence.

The resurrection of the Bagamoyo port project under Suluhu, as opposed to Magufuli’s rejection, reflects a political gamble. Economic benefits tied to these projects are palpable, with promises of increased trade, tourism, and infrastructure. Yet, the questions surrounding the PRC’s ultimate goals persist, especially as Chinese state-owned entities continue to assert control over Tanzanian infrastructure. For Tanzanians, the MSR presents a double-edged sword: while it may offer short-term economic gains, the long-term implications could compromise their nation’s autonomy, its labor market, and the ecological health of its coastline.

As Tanzania edges closer to finalizing agreements under the MSR, it faces a choice: embrace foreign investment with open arms or establish safeguards to protect its people, economy, and sovereignty. The MSR’s Shekou Model 4.0 has proven transformative in regions it touches, and yet its success in Africa may hinge on African leaders demanding equitable terms. Tanzania stands at a crossroads – will it carve out a future where it holds the reins, or allow its coastline to become an outpost in a foreign trade network?

In essence, Tanzania’s alignment with China’s MSR opens a Pandora’s box of economic opportunities interwoven with sovereignty challenges. The allure of infrastructure and industry may bring prosperity, but only if managed with vigilance and an unyielding commitment to Tanzania’s future. Otherwise, the nation’s partnership with China could evolve into a binding economic dependency that ultimately places its autonomy at risk.

Read Also: China’s Expanding Grip in Tanzania: Unraveling Security Collaborations, Military Aid, And The Shadow Of A Permanent Base