Why Is Ruto’s Government Obsessed With Wrecking Functional Systems And Replacing Them with Expensive Failures?

Kenya’s government has a peculiar habit—one that would be amusing if it weren’t so devastating. Every few months, it identifies a system that is working just fine, tears it down, and replaces it with something new, shiny, and completely dysfunctional. The latest victim of this destructive cycle? The country’s payment infrastructure.
A Nigerian firm is now seeking the State House’s blessing to build a new payment system for the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK). On paper, this sounds like a noble technological advancement. But there’s a catch—a Sh26 billion catch, to be precise. That’s the price tag attached to this so-called modernization. Meanwhile, Kenyan banks, the key players in this sector, are firmly opposed to the idea. Their argument? Instead of building a new system from scratch, why not simply upgrade PesaLink, which is already in place and functioning?
It’s a reasonable proposal, but this government doesn’t do it reasonably. Logic is rarely invited to the decision-making table, especially when billions are up for grabs. The strategy is simple: break something, pretend it’s beyond repair, and then spend obscene amounts of taxpayer money creating a costly alternative that, more often than not, doesn’t work.
Take the NHIF, for instance. Kenyans had a flawed but functioning national health insurance scheme. Instead of fixing its inefficiencies, the government dismantled it and replaced it with the chaotic SHIF, which has left millions without healthcare coverage. The only thing SHIF has achieved so far is draining more public funds into the bottomless pit of corruption.
Now, the payment system is next in line. If history is anything to go by, Kenyans should brace for yet another expensive disaster. The introduction of a new CBK system will not only cost billions but will also destabilize the financial sector, making transactions slower, businesses more vulnerable, and banks uncertain about the rules of the game. A functional system is predictable and reliable; a government that constantly changes the rules creates an environment where businesses and investors cannot plan for the future.
Imagine running a company where every few months, you’re forced to overhaul your entire accounting system because someone at State House has decided that “modernization” is needed. That’s what Kenya’s financial sector is facing. A stable, predictable payment infrastructure is the backbone of commerce. When the government keeps changing it, businesses suffer. Who wants to invest in a country where financial regulations and systems are constantly shifting like dunes in the wind?
And let’s talk about the money—because, ultimately, that’s what this is all about. Sh26 billion. That’s enough to fund public hospitals, repair roads, or even subsidize electricity for struggling businesses. But no, it must go into yet another grand experiment that serves no one but well-connected middlemen who thrive in chaos. If every few years the government scraps an old system for a new one, who benefits? Not the public.
If the past is any indicator, this new CBK system will be riddled with problems. It will be rolled out with much fanfare, glitches will emerge, businesses will struggle, and before long, another “modernization” proposal will come along, promising to fix the very problems this one created. And the cycle will continue—while Kenyans foot the bill.
Meanwhile, businesses are left grappling with uncertainty. Today, they must comply with one system. Tomorrow, it’s another. Policies shift at the whims of those in power, and those who fail to adapt quickly enough are crushed. The only constant in Kenya’s financial sector is change—change that costs billions and delivers nothing.
And we must ask ourselves: why is this government so eager to fix what isn’t broken? If the goal were truly improvement, wouldn’t we be seeing actual progress? Wouldn’t we have a healthcare system that works? A functional education system? An efficient public transport network? Instead, we see a pattern of destruction, waste, and failed experiments that leave the country worse off than before.
Kenya doesn’t have a problem with outdated systems. It has a problem with leadership that sees every existing structure as an opportunity—not to serve the public, but to loot. The motivation behind these unnecessary overhauls is not innovation but the creation of artificial crises that justify massive expenditures.
A government that constantly destabilizes key sectors is not governing—it’s gambling with the country’s future. Businesses thrive in environments of certainty. Investors put their money where there is stability. Yet, with every reckless policy change, Kenya moves further away from being a predictable, business-friendly economy. We’re not modernizing; we’re becoming a case study in self-sabotage.
And let’s be clear: no one is asking for stagnation. Systems should evolve. But evolution requires thoughtful improvements, not reckless demolitions. No sane person would burn down their house just because they want new windows, but that is precisely how this government operates.
The saddest part is that Kenyans have seen this play out before. We watched NHIF collapse into SHIF. We saw KPLC hike electricity prices after “reforms.” We witnessed tax changes that made life harder for small businesses. And now, we are about to see a payments infrastructure overhaul that will make transactions costlier, slower, and riskier—all at the taxpayer’s expense.
If this new CBK system is implemented, expect businesses to struggle with integration. Expect banks to raise transaction costs to cover compliance expenses. Expect the economy to slow down as companies spend time and resources adapting to another ill-advised government directive. But most of all, expect another round of looting, because that’s the only real reason these changes happen in the first place.
Kenya’s problem is not a lack of technology, efficiency, or innovation. It is a government that believes progress is measured by how much public money is funneled into unnecessary projects. Every failed system is an opportunity to create another, and every new system is an opportunity to steal more.
It is time Kenyans started asking harder questions. Who benefits when a perfectly good system is scrapped? Who is funding the push for these unnecessary changes? And why does it always seem like the government’s “solutions” make things worse?
The answers are not hard to find. Follow the money. If something works, they will break it, and if it’s broken, they will promise to fix it at twice the cost. That is the game. And until we stop them, we will keep paying for the destruction of our own country—one “modernization” at a time.
Read Also: The Betrayal of a Generation: How Ruto and Raila Sold Out Kenya’s Youth for Power and Corruption
About Soko Directory Team
Soko Directory is a Financial and Markets digital portal that tracks brands, listed firms on the NSE, SMEs and trend setters in the markets eco-system.Find us on Facebook: facebook.com/SokoDirectory and on Twitter: twitter.com/SokoDirectory
- January 2025 (119)
- February 2025 (191)
- March 2025 (212)
- April 2025 (137)
- January 2024 (238)
- February 2024 (227)
- March 2024 (190)
- April 2024 (133)
- May 2024 (157)
- June 2024 (145)
- July 2024 (136)
- August 2024 (154)
- September 2024 (212)
- October 2024 (255)
- November 2024 (196)
- December 2024 (143)
- January 2023 (182)
- February 2023 (203)
- March 2023 (322)
- April 2023 (297)
- May 2023 (267)
- June 2023 (214)
- July 2023 (212)
- August 2023 (257)
- September 2023 (237)
- October 2023 (264)
- November 2023 (286)
- December 2023 (177)
- January 2022 (293)
- February 2022 (329)
- March 2022 (358)
- April 2022 (292)
- May 2022 (271)
- June 2022 (232)
- July 2022 (278)
- August 2022 (253)
- September 2022 (246)
- October 2022 (196)
- November 2022 (232)
- December 2022 (167)
- January 2021 (182)
- February 2021 (227)
- March 2021 (325)
- April 2021 (259)
- May 2021 (285)
- June 2021 (272)
- July 2021 (277)
- August 2021 (232)
- September 2021 (271)
- October 2021 (304)
- November 2021 (364)
- December 2021 (249)
- January 2020 (272)
- February 2020 (310)
- March 2020 (390)
- April 2020 (321)
- May 2020 (335)
- June 2020 (327)
- July 2020 (333)
- August 2020 (276)
- September 2020 (214)
- October 2020 (233)
- November 2020 (242)
- December 2020 (187)
- January 2019 (251)
- February 2019 (215)
- March 2019 (283)
- April 2019 (254)
- May 2019 (269)
- June 2019 (249)
- July 2019 (335)
- August 2019 (293)
- September 2019 (306)
- October 2019 (313)
- November 2019 (362)
- December 2019 (318)
- January 2018 (291)
- February 2018 (213)
- March 2018 (275)
- April 2018 (223)
- May 2018 (235)
- June 2018 (176)
- July 2018 (256)
- August 2018 (247)
- September 2018 (255)
- October 2018 (282)
- November 2018 (282)
- December 2018 (184)
- January 2017 (183)
- February 2017 (194)
- March 2017 (207)
- April 2017 (104)
- May 2017 (169)
- June 2017 (205)
- July 2017 (189)
- August 2017 (195)
- September 2017 (186)
- October 2017 (235)
- November 2017 (253)
- December 2017 (266)
- January 2016 (164)
- February 2016 (165)
- March 2016 (189)
- April 2016 (143)
- May 2016 (245)
- June 2016 (182)
- July 2016 (271)
- August 2016 (247)
- September 2016 (233)
- October 2016 (191)
- November 2016 (243)
- December 2016 (153)
- January 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (164)
- April 2015 (107)
- May 2015 (116)
- June 2015 (119)
- July 2015 (145)
- August 2015 (157)
- September 2015 (186)
- October 2015 (169)
- November 2015 (173)
- December 2015 (205)
- March 2014 (2)
- March 2013 (10)
- June 2013 (1)
- March 2012 (7)
- April 2012 (15)
- May 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (2)
- December 2012 (1)