Skip to content
Government and Policy

When KSh 200 Buys Darkness: How EPRA’s New Power Charges Are Turning Electricity Into an Economic Punishment

BY Steve Biko Wafula · May 21, 2026 04:05 am

How did we get here, as a country, where electricity, one of the most basic pillars of modern life, is slowly being turned into a privilege for those who can afford pain? EPRA has approved three fresh charges that will now follow every Kenyan into the meter: KSh 3.47 per kilowatt-hour for fuel costs, KSh 1.23 per kilowatt-hour for foreign exchange losses, and KSh 0.0154 per kilowatt-hour for a water levy. Together, these additions amount to about KSh 4.70 on every single unit of electricity before the other heavy charges already sitting on power bills are even fully felt.

This is not a small technical adjustment hidden inside energy language. This is a direct assault on household budgets, small businesses, schools, hospitals, churches, factories, salons, barbershops, cybercafes, cold rooms, welding shops and every Kenyan who depends on power to live, study, work or earn. When the cost of electricity rises sharply, the effect does not remain inside the meter. It spreads across the whole economy like a tax on breathing.

The immediate result is brutal. A family buying KSh 200 worth of tokens is now getting about 6.4 units when the same KSh 200 bought 8 units just last month. That difference may look small to people sitting in air-conditioned offices, but to ordinary families it means fewer hours of light, fewer cooked meals, less time for children to study, less power for a small fridge, and more darkness in homes already fighting inflation, school fees, rent and food prices.

The deeper tragedy is that this increase comes at a time when Kenyans are already exhausted. Salaries are not rising at the pace of taxes. Businesses are not recovering at the pace of new levies. The shilling pressure, high fuel costs, punitive taxation and weak purchasing power have already squeezed households to the wall. Then comes EPRA, adding another layer of pain and asking the public to accept it as normal regulation.

Let us call this by its proper name. It is economic punishment. It is a policy decision that transfers institutional inefficiency, fuel cost exposure, currency weakness and system losses directly to the consumer. The ordinary Kenyan did not design the power purchase agreements. The ordinary Kenyan did not mismanage energy planning. The ordinary Kenyan did not create the forex losses. Yet the ordinary Kenyan is being asked to pay for all of it through every token purchase.

The question must therefore be asked loudly and without fear: how did we get here? How did we arrive at a point where the regulator appears more comfortable passing pain to the public than defending the public from pain? How did energy pricing become a dumping ground for costs that citizens cannot audit, cannot negotiate, cannot reject and cannot escape?

Electricity is not a luxury. It is the foundation of dignity in a modern economy. It lights homes, powers hospitals, keeps medicine cold, runs school computers, keeps security lights on, powers water pumps, supports digital work, keeps shops open and enables manufacturing. When electricity becomes unaffordable, poverty deepens. When electricity becomes unpredictable or too expensive, investment slows down. When power becomes a punishment, the economy bleeds quietly.

The impact on small businesses will be immediate and painful. A barber will raise prices or close earlier. A salon will pass costs to customers who are already broke. A shopkeeper with a fridge will sell less cold stock. A welder will charge more. A cybercafe will struggle. A small bakery will price itself out of the market. A hotel will increase meal prices. The consumer will pay again and again, not only through tokens but through every product and service touched by electricity.

Manufacturing will also suffer. Kenya talks about industrialisation, jobs, exports and value addition, but no country can manufacture competitively when power costs keep rising without mercy. Every additional shilling per unit enters the cost of production. It makes locally produced goods more expensive. It weakens our competitiveness. It discourages factories. It punishes employers. It exports jobs to countries where energy planning is treated as an economic priority, not a billing experiment.

The worst part is that the public is being asked to carry costs whose details remain too technical, too hidden and too poorly explained. Fuel cost charges, forex adjustment charges and levies may appear legal on paper, but legality is not the same as justice. A charge can be lawful and still be oppressive. A tariff can follow procedure and still destroy livelihoods. A regulator can publish a notice and still fail the public interest test.

This is where the Law Society of Kenya must step in. LSK cannot watch silently as millions of consumers are pushed into deeper hardship by a policy that may make life unbearable. The legal profession exists partly to defend the public when power is exercised unfairly, irrationally, disproportionately or without sufficient regard to constitutional rights and public interest. This is one of those moments.

LSK should urgently move to court and seek orders compelling EPRA to rescind, suspend or review these charges. The matter is not merely about electricity bills; it is about economic rights, consumer protection, fair administrative action, transparency, accountability and the duty of public bodies to act reasonably. Kenyans deserve a regulator that explains, justifies and protects, not one that simply passes costs down the chain.

The court should be asked to interrogate whether the new charges are proportionate in the current economic environment. It should ask whether the public was properly heard. It should ask whether EPRA considered the cumulative burden of all existing charges on electricity. It should ask whether households and businesses can reasonably absorb a 20% to 30% spike in power bills when disposable income is already collapsing.

There must also be a serious public-interest audit of the electricity billing structure. Kenyans need to know what they are paying for, why they are paying it, who benefits from it, and whether any of the costs are avoidable. You cannot keep adding fuel costs, forex losses, levies and other charges to a power bill and still pretend the consumer is dealing with a simple electricity purchase. The bill has become a battlefield of hidden burdens.

Parliament must also stop pretending this is a normal sector issue. Energy pricing is now a cost-of-living emergency. If a KSh 200 token purchase can lose a significant portion of its value in one month, then the country is not dealing with ordinary fluctuation. It is dealing with a policy shock. MPs must summon EPRA, Kenya Power, the Ministry of Energy and the Treasury to explain how the public ended up here.

The government cannot continue preaching productivity while making production expensive. It cannot tell young people to start businesses while making electricity unaffordable. It cannot talk about digital jobs while increasing the cost of staying connected. It cannot talk about manufacturing while power prices punish every machine that turns. This contradiction is destroying the economy from the bottom up.

There is also a moral question here. What happens to the poorest family that buys tokens in small amounts because that is all they can afford? What happens to the student studying at night? What happens to the mother who needs power for a small food business? What happens to the patient whose medicine needs refrigeration? What happens to the informal trader who cannot pass costs to customers because the customers are also broke?

Policy must never be designed as if citizens are numbers on a spreadsheet. Behind every token purchase is a home, a business, a child, a patient, a dream or a struggle. When KSh 200 buys fewer units, it is not just a meter reading that changes. It is the rhythm of life inside a home that changes. It is the time a child studies. It is the cost of supper. It is the survival of a small enterprise.

EPRA must therefore be reminded that regulation is not a licence to make suffering technical. The language of tariffs, adjustments and pass-through costs should not be used to hide the human consequences of policy failure. If the system is inefficient, reform the system. If contracts are expensive, review the contracts. If planning is weak, fix planning. Do not keep punishing citizens as if they are the source of every institutional failure.

This country needs a new standard for public pricing decisions. Before any regulator approves a charge that affects millions of people, it must clearly show the impact on the poorest households, the impact on small businesses, the impact on inflation, the impact on jobs and the impact on national competitiveness. Public participation must mean more than ticking a procedural box. It must actually shape the outcome.

The demand is simple and urgent. EPRA must rescind or suspend these charges and subject them to a proper public-interest review. LSK must take legal action. Civil society must join. Consumer bodies must speak. Parliament must investigate. Kenyans must refuse to normalize a situation where electricity becomes another weapon against survival.

If nothing is done, the consequences will be severe. Power bills will rise. Businesses will transfer costs. Households will reduce consumption. Students will study less. Small enterprises will close earlier. Manufacturers will become less competitive. Inflation will spread. Poverty will deepen. And the country will keep wondering why growth figures on paper do not match the pain in ordinary homes.

How did we get here? We got here because charges were added one after another while the public was expected to adjust quietly. We got here because regulators became too comfortable speaking in technical language while citizens paid in real pain. We got here because institutions forgot that electricity is not merely a commodity; it is a lifeline.

The time for silence is over. This policy must be challenged before life becomes unbearable. EPRA must be compelled to reconsider. The Law Society of Kenya must move with urgency. Kenya cannot build an economy by switching off homes, suffocating small businesses and asking citizens to fund every failure hidden inside the power sector. When KSh 200 begins to buy darkness, a nation must stop and demand answers.

Read Also: EPRA Director General Daniel Kiptoo is Elected Chair of the Regional Power Regulatory Board

Steve Biko is the CEO OF Soko Directory and the founder of Hidalgo Group of Companies. Steve is currently developing his career in law, finance, entrepreneurship and digital consultancy; and has been implementing consultancy assignments for client organizations comprising of trainings besides capacity building in entrepreneurial matters.He can be reached on: +254 20 510 1124 or Email: info@sokodirectory.com

Trending Stories
Related Articles
Explore Soko Directory
Soko Directory Archives