Who is Fooling who in the Reviving of Pan Paper?

By Soko Directory Team / May 3, 2016 | 7:02 am




Someone said that Kenyan politicians are those kind of people who will promise you hell in such kind and sweet words in such a manner that you will keep on looking forward to the trip. They are at it again. Always seeing an opportunity that works to their favor and capitalizing on every loophole. They are always out to take every credit even where it is not due.

Ever since President Uhuru Kenyatta announced plans to revive the collapsed Webuye Pan Paper factory, politicians have stated taking credit about it. This article tries to point out who is fooling who and who is being fooled by who? First, let us ask ourselves these questions:

  1. Who is reviving Pan Paper?
  2. What is the role of the government in reviving Pan Paper?
  3. Have politicians played any role in reviving the dead mill?
  4. What was the value of Pan Paper?

Who is reviving Pan Paper? Is it the government or a private investor? The truth is that the government is not reviving Pan Paper. This what most politicians don’t want hear but it is the truth. Pan Paper has been sold to an investor called Rai and who has offered to revive the mill at a cost of six billion shillings. Attempts by the government to try and revive the factory in 2010 failed terribly with the mill only managing to operate for two weeks. The government then managed to inject in one billion shillings. Among other reasons why the factory went down was debts as well other issues such as the change of the name.

What is the role of the government in reviving Pan Paper? The fact that the government has played a major role in making sure that Pan Paper comes back to its feet cannot be underestimated. This however, does not mean that the government is owning shares in the mill, maybe at a future stage. The main role of the government for the ongoing resurrection of Pan Paper lies in policy formulation, overseeing the sale of the assets the current administrator as well as facilitating the licencing.

Have politicians played any role in reviving Pan Paper? The answer is yes but that does not mean that they are responsible for the recovery. Politicians, especially from the larger Western Region have been making noise about the grounding of the factory. This noise somehow maintained the attention of the authorities concerned on the issue. 2017 is around the corner. The hunting expedition for votes long kicked off. The reviving of Pan Paper is timely and all that goes to the politicians.

Pan Paper was sold for 900 million shillings. Questions are however being asked as to how the value depreciated from 18 billion in 2012 to 900 million in 2016.


Article by Juma Fred.





About Soko Directory Team

Soko Directory is a Financial and Markets digital portal that tracks brands, listed firms on the NSE, SMEs and trend setters in the markets eco-system.Find us on Facebook: facebook.com/SokoDirectory and on Twitter: twitter.com/SokoDirectory

View other posts by Soko Directory Team


More Articles From This Author







Trending Stories










Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE



ARCHIVES

2020
  • January 2020 (272)
  • February 2020 (310)
  • March 2020 (390)
  • April 2020 (321)
  • May 2020 (335)
  • June 2020 (327)
  • July 2020 (334)
  • August 2020 (276)
  • September 2020 (214)
  • October 2020 (185)
  • 2019
  • January 2019 (253)
  • February 2019 (216)
  • March 2019 (285)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (272)
  • June 2019 (251)
  • July 2019 (338)
  • August 2019 (293)
  • September 2019 (306)
  • October 2019 (313)
  • November 2019 (362)
  • December 2019 (319)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (213)
  • March 2018 (278)
  • April 2018 (225)
  • May 2018 (238)
  • June 2018 (178)
  • July 2018 (256)
  • August 2018 (249)
  • September 2018 (256)
  • October 2018 (287)
  • November 2018 (284)
  • December 2018 (185)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (194)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (205)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (165)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (190)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (245)
  • June 2016 (182)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (248)
  • September 2016 (234)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (166)
  • April 2015 (108)
  • May 2015 (116)
  • June 2015 (120)
  • July 2015 (148)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (188)
  • October 2015 (169)
  • November 2015 (173)
  • December 2015 (207)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950