575 Telkom Kenya Employees To Be Fired In Airtel-Telkom Merger

By Carlos Onyango / July 31, 2019 | 10:44 am



Telkom Kenya

Telkom Kenya has announced its intention to terminate the employment of approximately 575 of its employees, on account of redundancy following the merger transaction with Airtel Kenya.

According to Telkom, as a consequence of the Transaction between the two companies, it will discontinue the transferred business and might terminate the employees that are currently deployed to serve in certain functions. Other employees who provide administrative and/or support services are also likely to be impacted.

“In accordance with the provisions of Section 40 of the Employment Act, 2007, we have notified the Communications Workers Union (COWU), and sent out individualized letters to staff where applicable as well as to the County Labor offices, giving one-months’ notice with effect from July 31, 2019, of our intention to terminate the employment of approximately 575 of our employees, on account of redundancy, as a result of the Transaction,” said Telkom in a notice.

Telkom issued a statement that there will be a thirty-day consultative period to enable dialogue between the business and staff, ensuring that any ideas, suggestions, and queries are received and given due consideration.

In the meantime, the Airtel-Telkom merger will retain non-transferring business activities in a redefined Telkom organization along with human resources that will be required by the organization. This would mean that the HR department won’t be declared redundant.

However, the redundant employees would be offered chances in the joint venture company if there would be available positions and provided, they meet the required standard recruitment criteria.

READ ALSO: Telkom will still control its ICT unit even after Airtel merger, says CA 

Airtel Kenya and Telkom Kenya Limited had signed a binding deal on February 8, 2019, that would have them combine their respective Mobile, Enterprise and Carrier Services businesses in Kenya to operate under a joint venture company (JV Co) to be named Airtel-Telkom.

The finalization and closure of the Transaction are subject to approval by the relevant authorities, which approvals are still on considerations.

Some analysts argue that the merger will have a little impact in presenting a strong challenge to Safaricom who are currently having the market leadership.

“Both Airtel and Telkom Kenya have focused primarily on pricing as their main customer acquisition strategy, ignoring the impact of product diversity,” argues a Sterling Capital analyst.

“Although this has been somewhat effective in the short-term, it has not delivered the desired impact in terms of business revenue growth and profitability.”

READ ALSO: Airtel – Telkom Merger Taking Shape: Should Safaricom Be Uneasy? 







More Articles From This Author







Trending Stories










Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE



ARCHIVES

2020
  • January 2020 (272)
  • February 2020 (310)
  • March 2020 (390)
  • April 2020 (322)
  • May 2020 (271)
  • 2019
  • January 2019 (253)
  • February 2019 (216)
  • March 2019 (285)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (272)
  • June 2019 (251)
  • July 2019 (338)
  • August 2019 (293)
  • September 2019 (306)
  • October 2019 (313)
  • November 2019 (362)
  • December 2019 (320)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (219)
  • March 2018 (278)
  • April 2018 (225)
  • May 2018 (238)
  • June 2018 (178)
  • July 2018 (256)
  • August 2018 (249)
  • September 2018 (256)
  • October 2018 (287)
  • November 2018 (284)
  • December 2018 (185)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (194)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (205)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (165)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (190)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (245)
  • June 2016 (182)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (248)
  • September 2016 (234)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (166)
  • April 2015 (108)
  • May 2015 (116)
  • June 2015 (120)
  • July 2015 (148)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (188)
  • October 2015 (169)
  • November 2015 (173)
  • December 2015 (207)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950