Airtel – Telkom Merger Taking Shape: Should Safaricom Be Uneasy?

By Korir Isaac / February 14, 2019




Airtel Kenya and Telkom Kenya announced plans for the merger of operations under the brand name Airtel-Telkom, a joint venture that will form the second largest telco network in Kenya.

Although the merger still awaits regulatory approval and has been lauded by Treasury and ICT ministries, should Safaricom be worried?

The telecommunications industry in Kenya has undergone various transitions. Before 2014, Kenya had 4 mobile telecom providers; Safaricom, Airtel, Orange – now Telkom Kenya – and Yu Mobile Kenya with a total subscriber base of 33.6Mn customers.

The four had subscriber market shares of 66.7, 16.5, 9.2, and 7.6 percent respectively. Years later, Safaricom is still at the top of the industry claiming the majority of the market share. As of 3Q18, Safaricom was still leading with 64.2 percent share followed by Airtel at 22.3 percent, and Telkom at 8.8 percent as shown below.

Nevertheless, over the years, Airtel and Telkom Kenya have failed to gain traction due to Safaricom’s substantial investment. Compared to its competitors, Safaricom commands capital investments that average 35 billion annually compared to Airtel’s estimate of 1 billion shillings.

The ineffective competitive strategy has also been linked to the failure of the other telco companies to rise. Tariff rivalry (voice, SMS and mobile data) has mainly been between the two small players, with minimal price adjustment by Safaricom which currently charges a minute of call at 4.3 shillings compared to competitors’ price of 2.00 – 2.60 shillings a minute.

Related: Telkom and Airtel Kenya Confirms Plans for Merger

Will Safaricom Be Shaken?

According to Genghis Capital, Sustainable competition will be based on ecosystems in addition to the product. For example, Telkom’s mobile money platform ‘T-cash’ has a good angle towards simplifying payments without the inconvenient use of till/agent numbers.

“The problem is, it’s just a product currently and large investments would be required to build the entire network from infrastructure to agents to merchants and convince customers of its superiority,” reads a statement by Genghis.

Voice and SMS

Genghis claims that the merged entity could increase the prices of its voice and SMS services to support profitability bearing in mind that voice and SMS are no longer an effective competitive gizmo over Safaricom.

The two revenue streams could be accounting for over 80 percent of their service revenue (compared to Safaricom’s diversified revenue structure, c.48 percent from voice and SMS).

Price increases may not necessarily be through direct tariff increases but could be through less (voice minutes, SMS or data) for the same current price (certain packaged products).

A price increase would require a careful balance not to upset current on-net subscribers from completely switching network.

Where Does Airtel-Telkom Stand?

The expectation is that Airtel-Telkom will be a stronger and effective competitor to Safaricom, especially in the data segment.

However, the overall evolving Safaricom ecosystem will be a major challenge to penetrate unless the new entity comes up with unique offers that customers would badly need in place of, or in addition to, the current Safaricom platform.

Also, there are no expectations of a ‘collusive’ duopoly given the historical rivalry against Safaricom and the possibility of intervention by regulatory agencies. In the duopoly market, some level of competition will continue to exist.

Also Read: Airtel and Telkom Merger to Counter the Telecommunications Dominance



About Korir Isaac

A creative, tenacious, and passionate journalist with impeccable ethics and a nose for anticipated and spontaneous news. He may not say it, but he sure can make one hell of a story.

View other posts by Korir Isaac


More Articles From This Author








Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE

ARCHIVES

2019
  • January 2019 (256)
  • February 2019 (216)
  • March 2019 (287)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (216)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (219)
  • March 2018 (279)
  • April 2018 (225)
  • May 2018 (239)
  • June 2018 (178)
  • July 2018 (257)
  • August 2018 (249)
  • September 2018 (256)
  • October 2018 (287)
  • November 2018 (286)
  • December 2018 (187)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (195)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (206)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (166)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (190)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (246)
  • June 2016 (183)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (249)
  • September 2016 (234)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (166)
  • April 2015 (109)
  • May 2015 (117)
  • June 2015 (121)
  • July 2015 (150)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (189)
  • October 2015 (170)
  • November 2015 (174)
  • December 2015 (208)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950