Here Is All You Need To Know About the New CRB Rules

By Soko Directory Team / August 23, 2019 | 6:45 am




Stats show that more than 2.7 million Kenyans are listed on various Credit Reference Bureaus (CRB) for either failing to pay their loans on time or for completely defaulting to pay.

The saddest thing is that 500,000 of the 2.7 million Kenyans have been listed for failing to pay less than 200 shillings, most of which were taken from mobile loan lenders.

It is because of what was described as “reckless” blacklisting of borrowers that the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) issued new guidelines that are meant to reduce risks for lenders as well as make it easier for customers to access credit.

Some of the new requirements include:

  • Making daily submissions of customer information to Credit Reference Bureaus (CRBs)
  • Introduction of standard validation checks to standardize the analysis of data by CRBs and enhance data acceptance rates
  • The classification of Non-Performing Loans indicator field to prudential risk classification which is meant to enhance loan classification is done as per CBK Prudential Guidelines.

Read:

Daily submissions will enable financial institutions, fintechs, and users to make quick lending decisions. This will, in turn, play an instrumental role in expanding access to credit and other services especially to the unbanked.

Increased access to digital lending solutions. Many lenders will embrace digital lending as a result of increased data on clients. This will improve access to credit due to reduced bureaucracy and costs associated with manual processing.

Daily submissions will also enhance individual customers’ creditworthiness since additional data categories may include information that lenders expect to be taken into consideration in advancing credit.

The submissions are set to reduce business risks, especially to financial institutions because of the improved credit analysis through information sharing. When comprehensive credit information is shared on reliable infrastructures, the cost of financial intermediation falls thus making financial products more accessible to a vast population. In addition, lenders and investors will have greater confidence in their ability to evaluate and price risk.

Lenders will be able to get real-time data through daily submissions that will further enhance risk-based pricing through new tools and automation. Consequently, stakeholders will be able to price risk appropriately and provide customized products and services to meet their specific needs.

It will also help identify “Serial defaulters”, who borrow from various banks with no intention of repaying. Undoubtedly these defaulters thrive in the “information asymmetry” environment that is prevailing due to lack of a credit information-sharing mechanism. This really calls for the Daily data submission to the bureaus such that defaulters are continuously blacklisted.

Effects of the introduction of standard validation checks to standardize the analysis of data by CRBs and enhance data acceptance rates

Interpretation of data: This will harmonize CRBs data interpretation across the CRBs. This means that all the CRBs will have similar/uniform CRB Reports, unlike the existing template where reports generated from CRBs have different parameters/characteristics.

Uniformity of data analysis results: The harmonized data reports will lead to uniform data analysis results across the CRB companies. This will reduce customers’ complaints. Previously CRBs gave different data analysis results making it difficult for financial institutions to interpret and determine the outcomes.

Reliability of CRB data: The standardized analysis of data will enable borrowers to get a fair credit analysis for the facilities sought irrespective of the bureau from which the report is generated. With good and realistic credit analysis good borrowers will be able to access credits at better rates from financial institutions.

Enhancement of data security. Data from CRBs are susceptible to modification, replacement or reordering. Standard validation helps to prevent and detect such intrusion by unauthorized persons or systems. This will lead to the superiority of CRB data in determining creditworthiness. Standard validation will, therefore, increase the value of the information leading to the development and enhancement of credit reporting infrastructure that positively impacts crucial decisions.

It will address the fundamental problem of asymmetric information between borrowers and lenders which has led to adverse selection and credit rationing. Regulators and financial market participants will therefore increasingly recognize the value of standardized credit reporting systems in improving credit risk evaluation and portfolio management. The result will be the enhancement of financial supervision and financial sector stability as a tool in promoting access to credit.

This information has been provided by ABC Bank Credit Risk & Legal Department





About Soko Directory Team

Soko Directory is a Financial and Markets digital portal that tracks brands, listed firms on the NSE, SMEs and trend setters in the markets eco-system.Find us on Facebook: facebook.com/SokoDirectory and on Twitter: twitter.com/SokoDirectory

View other posts by Soko Directory Team


More Articles From This Author







Trending Stories










Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE



ARCHIVES

2019
  • January 2019 (256)
  • February 2019 (216)
  • March 2019 (285)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (272)
  • June 2019 (251)
  • July 2019 (339)
  • August 2019 (293)
  • September 2019 (306)
  • October 2019 (314)
  • November 2019 (362)
  • December 2019 (185)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (219)
  • March 2018 (278)
  • April 2018 (225)
  • May 2018 (238)
  • June 2018 (178)
  • July 2018 (257)
  • August 2018 (249)
  • September 2018 (256)
  • October 2018 (287)
  • November 2018 (284)
  • December 2018 (187)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (195)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (205)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (165)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (190)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (245)
  • June 2016 (182)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (248)
  • September 2016 (234)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (166)
  • April 2015 (108)
  • May 2015 (116)
  • June 2015 (120)
  • July 2015 (148)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (188)
  • October 2015 (169)
  • November 2015 (174)
  • December 2015 (207)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950