Court Orders Telcos To Pull Down 141 Copyright Infringing Sites

By Juma / Published November 27, 2020 | 7:40 am





The Kenya Copyright Board has hailed the Hight Court for moving with urgency and sanctioning a takedown notice as provided for in Section 35B of the Copyright Act amended in 2019 on two Kenyan telecommunications giants in a case filed by MultiChoice Kenya.

In the landmark ruling, the High Court ordered the two telcos in Kenya to immediately pull down and disable 141 sites that were suspected to be infringing on the copyrights of MultiChoice Kenya. This means people were using the sites to access content that was supposed to be aired and owned by MultiChoice Kenya.

“This is the first time that a Kenyan court has sanctioned a takedown notice as provided for in Section 35B of the Copyright Act amended in 2019,” said the Copyright Board in a statement, saying it is committed to ensuring players follow the laid-down rules.

Section 35B of the Copyright Act states that “a person whose rights have been infringed by content to which access is being offered by an internet service provider may request by way of takedown notice that the ISP removes the infringing content.”

MultiChoice Kenya had presented prayers before Justice Winfrida Okwany seeking the two telcos to be compelled to pull down the websites pending the full hearing of the case on March 3, 2021.

Here are the application for orders by MultiChoice Kenya before Justice Winfrida Okwany:

On her part, the Judge gave the orders for the two players to pull down their content as an interim measure to prevent further infringement on the copyrights of MultiChoice Kenya.

Here is the judge’s order:

The Kenyan Copyright Amendment Act of 2019 came into effect on 2 October 2019, repealing and amending various sections of the Copyright Act 12 of 2001 (Chapter 130).

The Amendment Act prescribed the creation of a Copyright Tribunal by the Chief Justice. The jurisdiction of the Tribunal includes appeals from KECOBO and disputes concerning the registration of copyright.

The amended Second Schedule to the Main Act set out several exclusions to copyright infringement. Parody is specifically listed as an exclusion, but this is subject to an acknowledgment of the author of the work.

The addition of Section 26C to the Main Act will also see an exclusion or defense to copyright infringement in circumstances where a work has been adapted to accommodate the blind or visually impaired persons. There are also several exclusions applicable to educational institutions and libraries.





About Juma

Juma is an enthusiastic journalist who believes that journalism has power to change the world either negatively or positively depending on how one uses it.(020) 528 0222 or Email: info@sokodirectory.com

View other posts by Juma


More Articles From This Author






Trending Stories










Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE



ARCHIVES

2021
  • January 2021 (182)
  • February 2021 (227)
  • March 2021 (325)
  • April 2021 (261)
  • May 2021 (67)
  • 2020
  • January 2020 (272)
  • February 2020 (310)
  • March 2020 (390)
  • April 2020 (321)
  • May 2020 (335)
  • June 2020 (327)
  • July 2020 (334)
  • August 2020 (276)
  • September 2020 (214)
  • October 2020 (233)
  • November 2020 (242)
  • December 2020 (187)
  • 2019
  • January 2019 (253)
  • February 2019 (216)
  • March 2019 (285)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (272)
  • June 2019 (251)
  • July 2019 (338)
  • August 2019 (293)
  • September 2019 (306)
  • October 2019 (313)
  • November 2019 (362)
  • December 2019 (319)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (213)
  • March 2018 (278)
  • April 2018 (225)
  • May 2018 (237)
  • June 2018 (178)
  • July 2018 (256)
  • August 2018 (249)
  • September 2018 (256)
  • October 2018 (287)
  • November 2018 (284)
  • December 2018 (186)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (194)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (205)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (165)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (190)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (245)
  • June 2016 (182)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (248)
  • September 2016 (234)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (166)
  • April 2015 (108)
  • May 2015 (116)
  • June 2015 (120)
  • July 2015 (148)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (188)
  • October 2015 (169)
  • November 2015 (173)
  • December 2015 (207)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950