Statement By Amb. Dina Mufti, Ministry of Foreign Affairs In Ethiopia

By David Indeje / Published February 16, 2021 | 6:31 pm




KEY POINTS

Ethiopia has been calling on the Sudanese authorities to reverse the situation and stresses that this is not helpful to the Sudanese and Ethiopian people and the region at large. 


Ethiopia smoke flag

H.E Ambassador Dina Mufti, Spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the FDRE briefed the local and international media based in South Sudan.

In his opening remarks, H.E Amb. Dina explained that the aim of the briefing was to provide the correct information about news circulating globally regarding Ethiopia. He focused his briefing on three issues; the law enforcement operation in Tigray Region and its aftermath, the Ethio-Sudan border issue, and the GERD (Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam) negotiations.

After a brief introduction on the three items, he responded to questions from members of the press. The main points are as follows:

On the law enforcement operation in Tigray:

He pointed out that since 2018, important changes are taking place in Ethiopia and the TPLF (Tigray People Liberation Front) which was dominating political and economic activity was showing resisting this change. The operation was, therefore, necessary because the leaders of TPLF who have been trying to sabotage the important political changes that have been taking place in Ethiopia since 2018, engaged in subversive activities and sponsoring various conflicts in the country finally attacked the Northern Command of the Ethiopian National Defense Force stationed in Tigray region and looted military equipment on Nov. 4, 2020.

He indicated that the operation is now over and the government is engaged in the rehabilitation of areas and people affected by the operation; confidence-building; and relief operations in the region. The government is working with 26 international agencies in providing relief operations to 92 distribution centers.

About the role of the AU on the law enforcement operation, he stressed that the issue is entirely an internal matter to Ethiopia and as such did not see any role of an outside body. He reemphasized that the operation is over now and rehabilitation efforts are is going on in the region.

On Sudan -Ethiopia border issue

He expounded that the two countries have longstanding friendly relations and that they not only share borders, but also the same history, same community, same cultural make-up, and cooperation.

However, he indicated that recently when the Ethiopian government focused its attention on the law enforcement operation in Tigray, the Sudanese army encroached into Ethiopian territory, destroyed property owned by Ethiopians; and some Sudanese officials even said that they have ‘reclaimed’ territory they said was Sudanese.

Ethiopia has been calling on the Sudanese authorities to reverse the situation and stresses that this is not helpful to the Sudanese and Ethiopian people and the region at large. Ethiopia emphasizes that the border issue which was there for a long time should be handled by the different mechanisms that the two countries were engaged in. The dispute should be solved peacefully, and war is not helpful at all. Ethiopia is calling our Sudanese brothers and sisters to look at the big picture, which is peace and tranquility in the region and focus on development.

On the role of South Sudan and others who offered to mediate, he said that Ethiopia appreciates initiatives of all concerned countries and bodies who offered to assist in resolving the border issue. Ethiopia is always ready to negotiate and solve the issue peacefully. The two countries’ border agreement was signed between Ethiopia and the British Colonial Administration. However, the British (Major Gwynn) conducted a demarcation exercise unilaterally, without the presence of the Ethiopian side. In 1972 the two sides exchanged notes to renegotiate and re-demarcate the border again and settle it amicably while maintaining the status quo.

The countries have been on the right track to solve the issue by establishing relevant joint committees/commissions.  However, there is no reason for Sudan to violate the status quo at this time. This belligerence on the Sudanese side does not reflect the longstanding relations between the two countries, and Ethiopia is asking Sudan to respect the status quo. We are also asking our friends and partners to impress upon the Sudanese authorities to that effect.  And Ethiopia believes that our Sudanese brothers and sisters will heed our requests and the issue to be settled peacefully. He also indicated that the border issue which was there for a long time is not related to the GERD Issue.

On the issue of the GERD (Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam)

H.E. Amb. Dina indicated that the construction of the dam has been taking place for a number of years and the tripartite negotiations on the filling and operations of the dam have been taking place between the three countries of Egypt, Ethiopia, and Sudan. Negotiations have been taking place on technical and legal issues and agreements have been reached on some issues.

However, it seems that Egypt and Sudan are not negotiating in good faith. Sudan has concerns regarding the safety of the dam and data sharing. In this regard, the International Panel of Experts (IPoE) which consisted of experts from the three countries as well as independent experts from other countries have studied the impact of the dam and proved its safety. And Ethiopia takes more care about the safety of the dam. Besides, Ethiopia is also willing to share data in reciprocity. So, these concerns seem to be pretexts for other motives that are against the interests of the people of Sudan.

The purpose of the dam is the generation of electricity and therefore, does not create significant harm to both Egypt and Sudan. Rather, it benefits both countries through the retention of siltation, reduction of water loss through evaporation, regulated flow of water throughout the year irrespective of low or high inflow, etc.

As it is a hydroelectric dam, the water hits the turbines and continues to flow to the Sudanese and Egyptian territories. Therefore, even though the trilateral negotiations have stalled now, we believe that the best solution is an agreement between the three countries through the trilateral negotiations under the auspices of the African Union. And while expressing its gratitude to the outgoing chair of the AU, the Republic of South Africa, Ethiopia is confident that the new chair of the AU, the Democratic Republic of Congo, will bring the three parties together again and help lead to a successful conclusion of the negotiations.

H.E. Amb. Dina also emphasized that Ethiopia has the legitimate right to use its natural resources, with the principle of equitable utilization of transboundary resources. As such, the construction and filling of the dam will continue as scheduled.  Therefore, the second-year filling will be done during the upcoming rainy season as it is during this time that we get an adequate flow of water.





About David Indeje

David Indeje is a writer and editor, with interests on how technology is changing journalism, government, Health, and Gender Development stories are his passion. Follow on Twitter @David_IndejeDavid can be reached on: (020) 528 0222 / Email: info@sokodirectory.com

View other posts by David Indeje


More Articles From This Author






Trending Stories










Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE



ARCHIVES

2021
  • January 2021 (182)
  • February 2021 (227)
  • March 2021 (325)
  • April 2021 (261)
  • May 2021 (100)
  • 2020
  • January 2020 (272)
  • February 2020 (310)
  • March 2020 (390)
  • April 2020 (321)
  • May 2020 (335)
  • June 2020 (327)
  • July 2020 (334)
  • August 2020 (276)
  • September 2020 (214)
  • October 2020 (233)
  • November 2020 (242)
  • December 2020 (187)
  • 2019
  • January 2019 (253)
  • February 2019 (216)
  • March 2019 (285)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (272)
  • June 2019 (251)
  • July 2019 (338)
  • August 2019 (293)
  • September 2019 (306)
  • October 2019 (313)
  • November 2019 (362)
  • December 2019 (319)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (213)
  • March 2018 (278)
  • April 2018 (225)
  • May 2018 (237)
  • June 2018 (178)
  • July 2018 (256)
  • August 2018 (249)
  • September 2018 (256)
  • October 2018 (287)
  • November 2018 (284)
  • December 2018 (186)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (194)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (205)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (165)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (190)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (245)
  • June 2016 (182)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (248)
  • September 2016 (234)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (166)
  • April 2015 (108)
  • May 2015 (116)
  • June 2015 (120)
  • July 2015 (148)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (188)
  • October 2015 (169)
  • November 2015 (173)
  • December 2015 (207)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950