Mumias Sugar Bidding Saga: The Debt-Clearance Period

By Juma / Published January 20, 2022 | 11:23 am




KEY POINTS

Seven bidders tried their luck. These were New Mumias Sugar/Devki Group, West Kenya Sugar, KE International, Kruman Finances, Pandal Industries, Kibos Sugar, and Sarai Group.


Mumias Sugar Sarai Group Mumias Sugar Company entrance.

KEY TAKEAWAYS


What criteria were used to leave out the person who was to clear the debt owed to KCB Group in 12 months and choose one who was to take 10 years?

Who stands to benefit from all this? Of what value does that serve the company?

Was the pain of jobless former employees, unpaid farmers, and shareholders put into consideration?


If you have a loan of 10,000 shillings and approach two people for help, one tells you he can help you clear the loan in 1 day while the other tells you he can help you clear it in 10 days, who are you likely to pick? The person who will help you clear it within the shortest duration. Right?

Mumias Sugar Company has been in dilapidated condition for years now. Upon collapsing, it was put under receivership and in the process, held captive the lives, dreams, and hopes of thousands of employees, farmers, and shareholders.

Despite the fact that mismanagement played a role in killing the once vibrant and roaring sugar factory in Kenya, debts were the major contributing factor. The company was weighed down by debts it owed lenders (such as Kenya Commercial Bank), employees (in salaries), and farmers (who had submitted their cane and never paid.)

With the debts weighing it down, and its economic grave opens just a few meters away, there was an urgent need to find a savior who would heal the ailing factory by clearing the debts owed to lenders, pay farmers, give employees back their jobs and get the company back to the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE).

When bidders were invited to submit their bid for the leasing and operating the assets that belong to Mumias Sugar Company, there was a glimmer of hope in many people, not only in Mumias but across the country. Seven bidders tried their luck. These were New Mumias Sugar/Devki Group, West Kenya Sugar, KE International, Kruman Finances, Pandal Industries, Kibos Sugar, and Sarai Group.

The bidders were asked how long it would take for each one of them to clear the debt owed to Mumias Sugar Company to KCB Group, and, therefore, get the factory back on its feet as soon as possible. The New Mumias Sugar/Devki Group said it would take 12 months, West Kenya was said 18 months while KE International said 90 months. At the same time, Pandal Industries said 38 months, Kibos Sugar 130 months, and Sarai Group 124 months.

Now, from the above, who would you have taken just on the basis of how long it would take to clear the debt? The one who would take 12 months or one who would take 124 months? Of course, any sound mind would go for one who would take 12 months. But guess who was picked; the one who would take 124 months.

What does this mean? It means, if the bidder who had committed to clear all the debts owed to KCB Group in 12 months was given the factory, Mumias Sugar would be free of debts in 12 months, shareholders will have their shares back on the NSE in 12 months, farmers will be relieved to start being paid in 12 months, and employees would have their livelihood back, working without the fear of auctioneers showing up at their workplace in the event of a default.

But with 124 months of clearing the debt (10 whole years), it means, Mumias Sugar Company will continue being at the mercy of KCB Group and other creditors for that period. It means shareholders will not be seeing their shares trading back at the NSE and it means, farmers will not be paid in time because the funds will be channeled to paying other debts owed to the “big boys.”

So, what criteria was used to leave out the person who was to clear the debt owed to KCB Group in 12 months and choose one who was to take 10 years? Who stands to benefit from all this? Of what value does that serve the company? Was the pain of jobless former employees, unpaid farmers, and shareholders put into consideration?

Watch out for the next piece at the pain that farmers and former employees of Mumias Sugar Company are going through.

Read More: The Mumias Sugar Resurrection Saga: Who Were The Bidders?




About Juma

Juma is an enthusiastic journalist who believes that journalism has power to change the world either negatively or positively depending on how one uses it.(020) 528 0222 or Email: info@sokodirectory.com

View other posts by Juma


More Articles From This Author








Trending Stories










Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE



ARCHIVES

2022
  • January 2022 (294)
  • February 2022 (329)
  • March 2022 (361)
  • April 2022 (294)
  • May 2022 (176)
  • 2021
  • January 2021 (182)
  • February 2021 (227)
  • March 2021 (325)
  • April 2021 (259)
  • May 2021 (285)
  • June 2021 (273)
  • July 2021 (277)
  • August 2021 (232)
  • September 2021 (271)
  • October 2021 (305)
  • November 2021 (364)
  • December 2021 (250)
  • 2020
  • January 2020 (272)
  • February 2020 (310)
  • March 2020 (390)
  • April 2020 (321)
  • May 2020 (335)
  • June 2020 (327)
  • July 2020 (333)
  • August 2020 (276)
  • September 2020 (214)
  • October 2020 (233)
  • November 2020 (242)
  • December 2020 (187)
  • 2019
  • January 2019 (251)
  • February 2019 (215)
  • March 2019 (283)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (269)
  • June 2019 (250)
  • July 2019 (337)
  • August 2019 (293)
  • September 2019 (306)
  • October 2019 (313)
  • November 2019 (362)
  • December 2019 (318)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (213)
  • March 2018 (275)
  • April 2018 (223)
  • May 2018 (235)
  • June 2018 (176)
  • July 2018 (256)
  • August 2018 (247)
  • September 2018 (255)
  • October 2018 (282)
  • November 2018 (282)
  • December 2018 (184)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (194)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (205)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (164)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (189)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (245)
  • June 2016 (182)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (247)
  • September 2016 (233)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (164)
  • April 2015 (107)
  • May 2015 (116)
  • June 2015 (119)
  • July 2015 (145)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (186)
  • October 2015 (169)
  • November 2015 (173)
  • December 2015 (205)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950