Education for Profit? The Ruto Government’s Dangerous Gamble With Kenya’s Future

By Steve Biko Wafula / Published September 2, 2024 | 4:25 pm



Moi University

The recent financial allocation cuts to the State Department for Higher Education and Research in Kenya signal a troubling trend in the government’s approach to education, one that could have disastrous long-term consequences for the country. With the budget allocation for the department slashed from KSh 91 billion last year to KSh 74 billion this year, and the department receiving no funds at all in the first month of the fiscal year, the government’s intentions have become increasingly suspect. These budgetary decisions raise critical questions about the commitment of the Ruto administration to supporting higher education, especially as Kenya embarks on its second year under a new Financing Model.

One of the most glaring issues here is the inconsistency between the government’s stated goals and its actions. The introduction of a new Financing Model was supposed to enhance access to higher education by providing students with more financial support. However, the reduced allocation and delayed disbursements indicate a lack of genuine commitment to this promise. If the government were truly invested in expanding access to higher education, we would expect to see increased funding to accommodate the rising number of students entering universities under this new system. Instead, the allocation has been cut, revealing the hollowness of the government’s rhetoric.

Moreover, the budgetary cuts and the government’s overall approach suggest a disturbing shift toward the privatization and commercialization of education. The reduction in funding for higher education, coupled with the delayed disbursement of funds, is likely to force universities to seek alternative sources of revenue, which could lead to higher tuition fees and other charges. This would make higher education less accessible to students from lower-income families, thereby entrenching social inequality. The narrative that education is a public good is being eroded, replaced by a market-driven ideology that treats education as a commodity to be bought and sold.

Read Also: Empowering Your Child’s Education Journey This New School Term

The idea of privatizing and commercializing education is not only misguided but also dangerous. Education is a fundamental right, not a privilege reserved for those who can afford it. By reducing public investment in higher education, the government is effectively placing a price tag on knowledge, limiting opportunities for thousands of young Kenyans. This is not just an economic issue but a moral one. A society that denies its young people the chance to learn, grow, and contribute to the public good is a society that has lost its way.

The reduction in funding is particularly alarming given the timing. As the second cohort of students prepares to join universities under the new Financing Model, the expectation should be for increased financial support, not less. The fact that the government is moving in the opposite direction suggests a deliberate strategy to undermine public education in favor of privatization. This is a betrayal of the trust that Kenyans placed in their leaders, and it risks setting the country back by decades.

The implications of this shift are far-reaching. Without adequate public funding, universities will struggle to maintain the quality of education they provide. Academic programs could be cut, research initiatives scaled back, and the quality of teaching compromised. This would not only harm students but also weaken the country’s ability to compete in the global knowledge economy. In a world where education is increasingly the key to economic success, Kenya cannot afford to let its universities fall behind.

The government’s approach also risks deepening social divides. As public universities become more expensive and less accessible, wealthier students will be able to afford private education, while those from poorer backgrounds will be left behind. This two-tier system would exacerbate existing inequalities and undermine social cohesion. It would also limit social mobility, as education, which should be the great equalizer, becomes a tool for entrenching privilege.

Furthermore, the lack of transparency and honesty in the government’s handling of this issue is deeply troubling. The fact that these cuts and delays are hidden in the fine print of government documents, rather than being openly discussed and debated, shows a disturbing disregard for accountability. The government’s attempts to downplay these developments and dismiss concerns as mere propaganda are an insult to the intelligence of the Kenyan people.

All Kenyans must understand what is at stake here. The future of the country depends on the education of its young people. If the government is allowed to proceed with its plans to privatize and commercialize education, the consequences will be felt for generations. The very fabric of Kenyan society is at risk as education becomes a privilege for the few rather than a right for all.

This issue should transcend political and tribal affiliations. The developments in the education sector affect every Kenyan, regardless of their background. It is in everyone’s interest to resist the government’s attempts to dismantle the public education system. The fight to preserve and strengthen public education is a fight for the future of the country.

In conclusion, the Ruto government’s actions in the education sector are not just a failure of policy; they represent a fundamental betrayal of the values that should guide the nation. By cutting funding for higher education and pushing toward privatization, the government is putting short-term financial considerations above the long-term well-being of the country. This is a dangerous gamble that Kenya cannot afford to take. It is time for the government to reverse course, restore funding for higher education, and recommit to the principle that education is a public good, essential for the nation’s future.

Read Also: The Truth About The University Funding Model: Ruto’s Plan To Segregate The Rich From The Poor Using Education




About Steve Biko Wafula

Steve Biko is the CEO OF Soko Directory and the founder of Hidalgo Group of Companies. Steve is currently developing his career in law, finance, entrepreneurship and digital consultancy; and has been implementing consultancy assignments for client organizations comprising of trainings besides capacity building in entrepreneurial matters.He can be reached on: +254 20 510 1124 or Email: info@sokodirectory.com

View other posts by Steve Biko Wafula


More Articles From This Author








Trending Stories










Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE



ARCHIVES

2024
  • January 2024 (238)
  • February 2024 (227)
  • March 2024 (190)
  • April 2024 (133)
  • May 2024 (157)
  • June 2024 (145)
  • July 2024 (136)
  • August 2024 (154)
  • September 2024 (74)
  • 2023
  • January 2023 (182)
  • February 2023 (203)
  • March 2023 (322)
  • April 2023 (298)
  • May 2023 (268)
  • June 2023 (214)
  • July 2023 (212)
  • August 2023 (257)
  • September 2023 (237)
  • October 2023 (264)
  • November 2023 (286)
  • December 2023 (177)
  • 2022
  • January 2022 (293)
  • February 2022 (329)
  • March 2022 (358)
  • April 2022 (292)
  • May 2022 (271)
  • June 2022 (232)
  • July 2022 (278)
  • August 2022 (253)
  • September 2022 (246)
  • October 2022 (196)
  • November 2022 (232)
  • December 2022 (167)
  • 2021
  • January 2021 (182)
  • February 2021 (227)
  • March 2021 (325)
  • April 2021 (259)
  • May 2021 (285)
  • June 2021 (272)
  • July 2021 (277)
  • August 2021 (232)
  • September 2021 (271)
  • October 2021 (305)
  • November 2021 (364)
  • December 2021 (249)
  • 2020
  • January 2020 (272)
  • February 2020 (310)
  • March 2020 (390)
  • April 2020 (321)
  • May 2020 (335)
  • June 2020 (327)
  • July 2020 (333)
  • August 2020 (276)
  • September 2020 (214)
  • October 2020 (233)
  • November 2020 (242)
  • December 2020 (187)
  • 2019
  • January 2019 (251)
  • February 2019 (215)
  • March 2019 (283)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (269)
  • June 2019 (249)
  • July 2019 (335)
  • August 2019 (293)
  • September 2019 (306)
  • October 2019 (313)
  • November 2019 (362)
  • December 2019 (318)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (213)
  • March 2018 (275)
  • April 2018 (223)
  • May 2018 (235)
  • June 2018 (176)
  • July 2018 (256)
  • August 2018 (247)
  • September 2018 (255)
  • October 2018 (282)
  • November 2018 (282)
  • December 2018 (184)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (194)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (205)
  • July 2017 (189)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (164)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (189)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (245)
  • June 2016 (182)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (247)
  • September 2016 (233)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (164)
  • April 2015 (107)
  • May 2015 (116)
  • June 2015 (119)
  • July 2015 (145)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (186)
  • October 2015 (169)
  • November 2015 (173)
  • December 2015 (205)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950