A Regressive Blow to Free Speech: The Computer Misuse And Cybercrimes (Amendment) Bill 2024

The proposed Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes (Amendment) Bill 2024 represents a drastic extension of state control over digital spaces, presenting significant concerns regarding the erosion of freedom of expression and potential legal contradictions with Kenya’s constitution.

At its core, the bill seeks to tackle cyber harassment, phishing, unauthorized SIM swaps, and other forms of digital criminality. One of the most contentious provisions, however, involves the criminalization of speech that may be deemed offensive. The bill grants authorities sweeping powers to impose fines of up to KES 20 million and prison sentences of up to ten years for cyber harassment. This includes indirect communications that can cause apprehension or fear of violence, or communications deemed “grossly offensive,” such as name-calling or insults like “Umbwa wewe” (which translates to “You dog”) online.

Read Also: Cybersecurity Skills Shortage Is Ranked As The Biggest Risk To MSPs And Their Clients

The Constitutional Dilemma 

This bill raises serious constitutional concerns, particularly with respect to the right to freedom of expression enshrined in Article 33 of the Kenyan Constitution. The Constitution guarantees every citizen the right to express their opinions freely, subject to limitations like hate speech or incitement to violence. By criminalizing speech that is merely offensive or hurtful without any consideration of the intent behind it or the severity of the harm, the bill oversteps the reasonable limitations allowed under the Constitution.

The broad and vague language used to define offenses in the bill, such as “grossly offensive,” is legally problematic. It opens up space for arbitrary interpretations and enforcement, which can be weaponized against critics, political dissenters, and civil society actors. The NC4 (National Computer and Cybercrimes Coordination Committee) is empowered to monitor, block, and control websites, further intensifying fears of a clampdown on free speech.

Read Also: 76% Of Companies Improved Their Cyber Defenses To Qualify For Cyber Insurance, Sophos Survey Finds

Impact on Digital Freedom and Economic Consequences 

One major consequence of such censorship-heavy provisions is the potential chilling effect on online discourse. If the bill passes, digital spaces may be sanitized to the point where even humorous, satirical, or mildly critical content is censored to avoid hefty penalties. This threatens to stifle creative and political expression online, an important outlet for Kenyans, especially during protests or times of political instability. Furthermore, in a world where digital platforms are essential to personal and professional life, excessive state control over speech could lead to self-censorship by citizens, bloggers, journalists, and activists alike.

From an economic perspective, this could hurt Kenya’s ICT sector, especially its burgeoning digital economy. By making the environment more hostile to free expression, investors and tech companies might reconsider their involvement in the country. The potential for arbitrary and excessive punishment for online behavior may also deter the next generation of entrepreneurs and digital innovators.

Global Comparisons and Authoritarian Overreach

Kenya risks following in the footsteps of more authoritarian regimes like Russia, China, and Turkey, which have used similar laws to suppress dissent and block access to critical websites. Under this proposed amendment, Kenya’s status as a hub for internet freedom could decline sharply, as these provisions would significantly weaken the democratic principles of free speech and dissent.

Critics argue that these amendments introduce digital authoritarianism in the name of curbing cybercrimes. While there is an acknowledged need to combat real issues such as cyber harassment and fraud, the bill, in its current form, overreaches by extending punitive measures that disproportionately target speech rather than focusing on genuine cyber threats.

Read Also: NCBA Bank Used USD 5 Million In 2023 To Fortify Its Cybersecurity

A Threat to Democracy and Speech 

While the proposed amendment may be well-intentioned in terms of protecting citizens from cybercrimes, its far-reaching implications, vague language, and potential for abuse make it a severe threat to free expression in Kenya. The ambiguity surrounding key terms in the bill gives the state nearly unchecked power over digital communication, contradicting constitutional freedoms and opening the door for misuse during politically charged moments, such as elections or protests.

To ensure a balance between cybersecurity and fundamental rights, the bill needs significant revisions, particularly clearer definitions, independent judicial oversight, and safeguards against abuse. Kenyans must engage actively in public discourse around this bill, pushing back on overly broad censorship powers, while advocating for genuine reforms that address cybercrime without curtailing their constitutional rights.

Read Also: NCBA Partners With SACCOs On Strengthening Cybersecurity Measures