The Bill Gates’ Shadow And Ruto’s Vaccine Controversy: A Betrayal of Kenyan Farmers

KEY POINTS
Examining the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock’s budget reveals the glaring inadequacy of funding for such an ambitious project. Vaccine manufacturing and distribution require billions of shillings, a scale of expenditure that Parliament would not have overlooked.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Instead of forcing a one-size-fits-all solution, the government should be engaging farmers in meaningful dialogue. Collaborative policymaking that incorporates the voices of those directly affected is not just a constitutional requirement but a moral imperative.
When President William Ruto urges Kenyan farmers to embrace a nationwide cattle vaccination campaign shrouded in controversy, one cannot ignore the glaring absence of budgetary allocation for this exercise in the national budget. It is no secret that the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock operates under constrained resources, a reality reflected in its latest allocation. Without parliamentary approval for a specific budget to manufacture vaccines or implement the vaccination exercise, the question of funding becomes inevitable. If not the government, then who? All signs point to external actors, with Bill Gates being the most probable financier of this campaign. The implications of such foreign funding are not only alarming but also a betrayal of Kenyan sovereignty and the dignity of its farmers.
The Constitution of Kenya clearly delineates the role of the president. As the Head of State and Government, the president is expected to safeguard the interests of the nation, uphold the rule of law, and ensure the proper functioning of public institutions. Pushing farmers to embrace a dubious vaccination campaign funded by foreign entities is far removed from these constitutional responsibilities. Instead of engaging in arm-twisting tactics, Ruto should be focusing on creating policies that empower farmers through subsidies, access to markets, and sustainable agricultural practices.
Read Also: Top 38 Crops You Can Plant In Mwea Tebere, Kirinyaga County
The notion that this vaccination drive is in the farmers’ best interest is riddled with falsehoods. Vaccination campaigns, especially on a national scale, require meticulous planning, proper infrastructure, and significant financial investment. Yet, there has been no transparent discussion or disclosure about the procurement of these vaccines, their efficacy, or even their safety. By sidestepping Parliament and bypassing the Ministry’s budgetary constraints, Ruto’s administration is essentially admitting that this project is externally funded. If the intentions were noble, why not secure parliamentary approval and allocate resources through the proper channels?
Foreign funding of critical initiatives like this raises fundamental questions about sovereignty and control. When external donors fund projects directly, they often come with strings attached, dictating terms that may not align with the country’s long-term interests. Kenya’s farmers deserve better than to be pawns in a global game of philanthro-capitalism, where decisions are driven by external agendas rather than local needs. This approach undermines the trust and confidence of citizens in their government.
Ruto’s rhetoric in pushing this campaign has been nothing short of insulting to the Kenyan people. By painting dissenting farmers as ignorant or resistant to progress, he disregards their legitimate concerns. These are individuals who have weathered years of neglect, corruption, and systemic failures in agricultural policy. Their skepticism is not unwarranted but rather a reflection of their lived experiences. Instead of addressing their fears with facts and transparency, the president’s combative tone only deepens the divide.
Read Also: The Rains Are Here, Here Are The Crops, Including Miraa That You Can Grow In Bungoma
Examining the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock’s budget reveals the glaring inadequacy of funding for such an ambitious project. Vaccine manufacturing and distribution require billions of shillings, a scale of expenditure that Parliament would not have overlooked. The absence of any line item for this exercise in the approved budget suggests that the government is not the financier. This lack of accountability is a dereliction of duty and an insult to the taxpayers who deserve to know how their money is being spent.
Kenya’s agricultural sector has long been underfunded, with farmers bearing the brunt of policy failures. Fertilizer subsidies, irrigation projects, and livestock insurance are but a few of the areas that require urgent attention. Yet, these priorities have been sidelined in favor of a vaccination campaign whose origin and intent remain unclear. This misalignment of priorities further alienates farmers and erodes their trust in the government.
Bill Gates’ involvement in agricultural projects across Africa is well-documented, often under the guise of philanthropy. However, the fine print of such partnerships often reveals ulterior motives, from promoting genetically modified organisms (GMOs) to influencing agricultural policies. If Gates is indeed funding this vaccination drive, Kenyans must question the long-term implications. Whose interests are being served, and at what cost to local farmers?
Ruto’s administration must also reckon with the ethical considerations of imposing a program on farmers without their informed consent. Vaccination is not merely a technical exercise but a deeply personal decision for livestock owners who depend on their animals for their livelihoods. By coercing farmers into compliance, the government undermines their autonomy and disregards their right to make informed choices.
The role of Parliament in approving public expenditure is enshrined in the Constitution. By circumventing this process, Ruto’s administration sets a dangerous precedent that undermines the principles of accountability and transparency. Such actions erode the very foundations of democracy and governance that the president is sworn to uphold.
Read Also: Drought Pushes Kenyan Farmers to Abandon Maize Farming for Brachiaria Grass
Instead of forcing a one-size-fits-all solution, the government should be engaging farmers in meaningful dialogue. Collaborative policymaking that incorporates the voices of those directly affected is not just a constitutional requirement but a moral imperative. Farmers’ concerns about vaccine safety, efficacy, and necessity must be addressed through open forums, backed by scientific evidence and expert opinions.
This vaccination controversy also exposes the broader failures of Ruto’s agricultural policies. From unfulfilled promises of subsidy programs to inadequate support for smallholder farmers, the president’s track record speaks volumes. This latest campaign is yet another example of misplaced priorities that fail to address the root causes of agricultural underperformance in Kenya.
As Kenyans, we must remain vigilant against the encroachment of foreign interests disguised as benevolence. Our sovereignty is not for sale, and our farmers’ dignity is not a bargaining chip. Ruto’s push for this vaccination exercise, without proper funding or parliamentary oversight, is a betrayal of the trust placed in him by the Kenyan people.
The time has come for farmers and citizens alike to demand accountability. If the government cannot transparently fund and execute such initiatives, it has no business imposing them on the people. Ruto’s actions in this matter are not just a failure of leadership but a direct affront to the principles of good governance and the rule of law. Only through transparency, accountability, and respect for the Constitution can Kenya chart a path toward agricultural prosperity and national dignity.
Read Also: To Keep Smallholder Farming Alive, Agri-insurance is Inevitable
About Steve Biko Wafula
Steve Biko is the CEO OF Soko Directory and the founder of Hidalgo Group of Companies. Steve is currently developing his career in law, finance, entrepreneurship and digital consultancy; and has been implementing consultancy assignments for client organizations comprising of trainings besides capacity building in entrepreneurial matters. He can be reached on: +254 20 510 1124 or Email: info@sokodirectory.com
- January 2025 (118)
- February 2025 (74)
- January 2024 (238)
- February 2024 (227)
- March 2024 (190)
- April 2024 (133)
- May 2024 (157)
- June 2024 (145)
- July 2024 (136)
- August 2024 (154)
- September 2024 (212)
- October 2024 (255)
- November 2024 (196)
- December 2024 (143)
- January 2023 (182)
- February 2023 (203)
- March 2023 (322)
- April 2023 (298)
- May 2023 (268)
- June 2023 (214)
- July 2023 (212)
- August 2023 (257)
- September 2023 (237)
- October 2023 (264)
- November 2023 (286)
- December 2023 (177)
- January 2022 (293)
- February 2022 (329)
- March 2022 (358)
- April 2022 (292)
- May 2022 (271)
- June 2022 (232)
- July 2022 (278)
- August 2022 (253)
- September 2022 (246)
- October 2022 (196)
- November 2022 (232)
- December 2022 (167)
- January 2021 (182)
- February 2021 (227)
- March 2021 (325)
- April 2021 (259)
- May 2021 (285)
- June 2021 (272)
- July 2021 (277)
- August 2021 (232)
- September 2021 (271)
- October 2021 (304)
- November 2021 (364)
- December 2021 (249)
- January 2020 (272)
- February 2020 (310)
- March 2020 (390)
- April 2020 (321)
- May 2020 (335)
- June 2020 (327)
- July 2020 (333)
- August 2020 (276)
- September 2020 (214)
- October 2020 (233)
- November 2020 (242)
- December 2020 (187)
- January 2019 (251)
- February 2019 (215)
- March 2019 (283)
- April 2019 (254)
- May 2019 (269)
- June 2019 (249)
- July 2019 (335)
- August 2019 (293)
- September 2019 (306)
- October 2019 (313)
- November 2019 (362)
- December 2019 (318)
- January 2018 (291)
- February 2018 (213)
- March 2018 (275)
- April 2018 (223)
- May 2018 (235)
- June 2018 (176)
- July 2018 (256)
- August 2018 (247)
- September 2018 (255)
- October 2018 (282)
- November 2018 (282)
- December 2018 (184)
- January 2017 (183)
- February 2017 (194)
- March 2017 (207)
- April 2017 (104)
- May 2017 (169)
- June 2017 (205)
- July 2017 (189)
- August 2017 (195)
- September 2017 (186)
- October 2017 (235)
- November 2017 (253)
- December 2017 (266)
- January 2016 (164)
- February 2016 (165)
- March 2016 (189)
- April 2016 (143)
- May 2016 (245)
- June 2016 (182)
- July 2016 (271)
- August 2016 (247)
- September 2016 (233)
- October 2016 (191)
- November 2016 (243)
- December 2016 (153)
- January 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (164)
- April 2015 (107)
- May 2015 (116)
- June 2015 (119)
- July 2015 (145)
- August 2015 (157)
- September 2015 (186)
- October 2015 (169)
- November 2015 (173)
- December 2015 (205)
- March 2014 (2)
- March 2013 (10)
- June 2013 (1)
- March 2012 (7)
- April 2012 (15)
- May 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (2)
- December 2012 (1)