Skip to content
Government and Policy

The Bill Gates’ Shadow And Ruto’s Vaccine Controversy: A Betrayal of Kenyan Farmers

BY Steve Biko Wafula · December 18, 2024 03:12 pm

KEY POINTS

Examining the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock’s budget reveals the glaring inadequacy of funding for such an ambitious project. Vaccine manufacturing and distribution require billions of shillings, a scale of expenditure that Parliament would not have overlooked.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

Instead of forcing a one-size-fits-all solution, the government should be engaging farmers in meaningful dialogue. Collaborative policymaking that incorporates the voices of those directly affected is not just a constitutional requirement but a moral imperative.

When President William Ruto urges Kenyan farmers to embrace a nationwide cattle vaccination campaign shrouded in controversy, one cannot ignore the glaring absence of budgetary allocation for this exercise in the national budget. It is no secret that the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock operates under constrained resources, a reality reflected in its latest allocation. Without parliamentary approval for a specific budget to manufacture vaccines or implement the vaccination exercise, the question of funding becomes inevitable. If not the government, then who? All signs point to external actors, with Bill Gates being the most probable financier of this campaign. The implications of such foreign funding are not only alarming but also a betrayal of Kenyan sovereignty and the dignity of its farmers.

The Constitution of Kenya clearly delineates the role of the president. As the Head of State and Government, the president is expected to safeguard the interests of the nation, uphold the rule of law, and ensure the proper functioning of public institutions. Pushing farmers to embrace a dubious vaccination campaign funded by foreign entities is far removed from these constitutional responsibilities. Instead of engaging in arm-twisting tactics, Ruto should be focusing on creating policies that empower farmers through subsidies, access to markets, and sustainable agricultural practices.

Read Also: Top 38 Crops You Can Plant In Mwea Tebere, Kirinyaga County

The notion that this vaccination drive is in the farmers’ best interest is riddled with falsehoods. Vaccination campaigns, especially on a national scale, require meticulous planning, proper infrastructure, and significant financial investment. Yet, there has been no transparent discussion or disclosure about the procurement of these vaccines, their efficacy, or even their safety. By sidestepping Parliament and bypassing the Ministry’s budgetary constraints, Ruto’s administration is essentially admitting that this project is externally funded. If the intentions were noble, why not secure parliamentary approval and allocate resources through the proper channels?

Foreign funding of critical initiatives like this raises fundamental questions about sovereignty and control. When external donors fund projects directly, they often come with strings attached, dictating terms that may not align with the country’s long-term interests. Kenya’s farmers deserve better than to be pawns in a global game of philanthro-capitalism, where decisions are driven by external agendas rather than local needs. This approach undermines the trust and confidence of citizens in their government.

Ruto’s rhetoric in pushing this campaign has been nothing short of insulting to the Kenyan people. By painting dissenting farmers as ignorant or resistant to progress, he disregards their legitimate concerns. These are individuals who have weathered years of neglect, corruption, and systemic failures in agricultural policy. Their skepticism is not unwarranted but rather a reflection of their lived experiences. Instead of addressing their fears with facts and transparency, the president’s combative tone only deepens the divide.

Read Also: The Rains Are Here, Here Are The Crops, Including Miraa That You Can Grow In Bungoma

Examining the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock’s budget reveals the glaring inadequacy of funding for such an ambitious project. Vaccine manufacturing and distribution require billions of shillings, a scale of expenditure that Parliament would not have overlooked. The absence of any line item for this exercise in the approved budget suggests that the government is not the financier. This lack of accountability is a dereliction of duty and an insult to the taxpayers who deserve to know how their money is being spent.

Kenya’s agricultural sector has long been underfunded, with farmers bearing the brunt of policy failures. Fertilizer subsidies, irrigation projects, and livestock insurance are but a few of the areas that require urgent attention. Yet, these priorities have been sidelined in favor of a vaccination campaign whose origin and intent remain unclear. This misalignment of priorities further alienates farmers and erodes their trust in the government.

Bill Gates’ involvement in agricultural projects across Africa is well-documented, often under the guise of philanthropy. However, the fine print of such partnerships often reveals ulterior motives, from promoting genetically modified organisms (GMOs) to influencing agricultural policies. If Gates is indeed funding this vaccination drive, Kenyans must question the long-term implications. Whose interests are being served, and at what cost to local farmers?

Ruto’s administration must also reckon with the ethical considerations of imposing a program on farmers without their informed consent. Vaccination is not merely a technical exercise but a deeply personal decision for livestock owners who depend on their animals for their livelihoods. By coercing farmers into compliance, the government undermines their autonomy and disregards their right to make informed choices.

The role of Parliament in approving public expenditure is enshrined in the Constitution. By circumventing this process, Ruto’s administration sets a dangerous precedent that undermines the principles of accountability and transparency. Such actions erode the very foundations of democracy and governance that the president is sworn to uphold.

Read Also: Drought Pushes Kenyan Farmers to Abandon Maize Farming for Brachiaria Grass

Instead of forcing a one-size-fits-all solution, the government should be engaging farmers in meaningful dialogue. Collaborative policymaking that incorporates the voices of those directly affected is not just a constitutional requirement but a moral imperative. Farmers’ concerns about vaccine safety, efficacy, and necessity must be addressed through open forums, backed by scientific evidence and expert opinions.

This vaccination controversy also exposes the broader failures of Ruto’s agricultural policies. From unfulfilled promises of subsidy programs to inadequate support for smallholder farmers, the president’s track record speaks volumes. This latest campaign is yet another example of misplaced priorities that fail to address the root causes of agricultural underperformance in Kenya.

As Kenyans, we must remain vigilant against the encroachment of foreign interests disguised as benevolence. Our sovereignty is not for sale, and our farmers’ dignity is not a bargaining chip. Ruto’s push for this vaccination exercise, without proper funding or parliamentary oversight, is a betrayal of the trust placed in him by the Kenyan people.

The time has come for farmers and citizens alike to demand accountability. If the government cannot transparently fund and execute such initiatives, it has no business imposing them on the people. Ruto’s actions in this matter are not just a failure of leadership but a direct affront to the principles of good governance and the rule of law. Only through transparency, accountability, and respect for the Constitution can Kenya chart a path toward agricultural prosperity and national dignity.

Read Also: To Keep Smallholder Farming Alive, Agri-insurance is Inevitable

Steve Biko is the CEO OF Soko Directory and the founder of Hidalgo Group of Companies. Steve is currently developing his career in law, finance, entrepreneurship and digital consultancy; and has been implementing consultancy assignments for client organizations comprising of trainings besides capacity building in entrepreneurial matters. He can be reached on: +254 20 510 1124 or Email: info@sokodirectory.com

Trending Stories
Related Articles
Explore Soko Directory
Soko Directory Archives