Don’t Fall For Fake Approval Scams

“Revoke” is always safe, right? That’s what most crypto users believe, especially since “revoke” is often considered a key part of Web3 wallet hygiene. Unfortunately, scammers have found a way to exploit this very feature. In our previous Web3 Wallet Security blogs, we covered the risks inherent in approving smart contract transactions without carefully verifying all the details. In this blog, we’ll break down what fake approval scams are, how scammers manipulate the “revoke” feature to their advantage, and most importantly, how you can avoid falling victim to these tactics.
What are fake approval scams?
Fake approval scams exploiting “revoke” trick users into thinking they’re taking back transaction permissions given to unfamiliar platforms or smart contracts. When users attempt to do this, they end up paying exorbitant “gas fees,” all while believing they’re securing their wallets.
The Lure: While browsing their token approvals on a blockchain explorer like Etherscan or inside their wallet, the user spots an unfamiliar approval for a token they don’t recognize. It looks like some unknown contract has access to their valuable assets. Panic sets in, and the user instinctively rushes to revoke the approval, believing they’re protecting their crypto.
The Trick: However, no real approval was ever granted in the first place. The scammer hasn’t touched the user’s tokens. Instead, they’ve played with the way the wallet or blockchain explorer displays information to make it seem like access has been granted to an unfamiliar contract. It’s nothing more than a clever visual trick – a fake approval designed to look legitimate. No access was ever granted, but when the user tries to revoke it, that’s where the scam trigger gets pulled.
The Gas Gimmick: The “revoke” transaction the user triggers is real – it’s a legitimate action, but it’s designed to cost them an arm and a leg in fees. The scammer profits from these inflated transaction costs, often using them to mint new tokens or execute other malicious actions under their control. What the user thought was a protective move turned into an expensive mistake. The fake approval was merely bait to lure them into paying for nothing.
While these scams don’t directly steal funds, they exploit the user by draining their wallet through outrageously high gas fees, leaving the rest of their assets untouched.
The Costly Loop: And the worst part? That sneaky approval doesn’t disappear from the explorer. If the user believes the revoke failed, they may try again, unknowingly feeding the scammer more funds. Each attempt escalates the loss, as the scammer gets another chance to pocket the user’s crypto. The more the user tries to fix it, the deeper they fall into the trap.
Real-Life example
In the image below, you’ll notice that the chain explorer indicates the user has granted unlimited approval for a “BEP-20 TOKEN*” to an unknown spender. This alarming sight can trigger panic, making the user believe they’ve unknowingly authorized a malicious contract.
However, in reality, this is a fake USDT token, and the scammers have manipulated the display to create the illusion of prior approval.
A closer look at the transaction page reveals that 300 supposed approval calls have been generated for multiple addresses linked to this fraudulent token. This tactic is designed to amplify the urgency, pressuring the victim into taking immediate action.
When the user attempts to revoke the approval, they are instead hit with exorbitant fees – ranging from a few dollars to potentially hundreds and more. These fees aren’t just wasted; the scammer actively exploits them, using the transaction to mint new tokens or execute additional malicious actions, all while remaining unnoticed.
In the example above, the victim’s attempt to revoke the approval backfired. The scammer leveraged the transaction for their own gain, leaving the user with unexpectedly high fees and no resolution: the misleading approval remained visible, reinforcing the illusion that another attempt was necessary.
How to Spot and Avoid These Scams
Stay calm
Scammers count on fear and urgency to push you into making a mistake. If something seems off, take a step back, breathe, and assess the situation before acting. A clear head is your best defense against falling into their trap.
Double-Check before you click
Before approving any transaction, take a moment to review the details. Does the amount look right? Do you recognize the contract address? Are there any odd warnings or unusual fees? If something feels off, cross-check with trusted sources, platforms or forums.
Know your fees
Familiarize yourself with the average size of gas fees on the chains you use. If a transaction fee looks suspiciously high or unusual, it could be a red flag. Use tools like Etherscan’s Gas Tracker, GasNow, or Blocknative’s Gas Estimator to monitor real-time gas prices and verify expected costs before proceeding.
Constantly educate yourself
Scammers are always refining their tactics, but knowledge is your strongest defense. The more you understand about emerging threats and security best practices, the better equipped you are to spot red flags before they become costly mistakes. Stay informed with Binance Academy, and dive into our security series for deeper insights of the latest frauds.
Read Also: Binance Pledges $100,000 In Kenyan Humanitarian Initiative
About Soko Directory Team
Soko Directory is a Financial and Markets digital portal that tracks brands, listed firms on the NSE, SMEs and trend setters in the markets eco-system.Find us on Facebook: facebook.com/SokoDirectory and on Twitter: twitter.com/SokoDirectory
- January 2026 (220)
- February 2026 (248)
- March 2026 (287)
- April 2026 (208)
- May 2026 (133)
- January 2025 (119)
- February 2025 (191)
- March 2025 (212)
- April 2025 (193)
- May 2025 (161)
- June 2025 (157)
- July 2025 (227)
- August 2025 (211)
- September 2025 (270)
- October 2025 (297)
- November 2025 (230)
- December 2025 (220)
- January 2024 (238)
- February 2024 (227)
- March 2024 (190)
- April 2024 (133)
- May 2024 (157)
- June 2024 (145)
- July 2024 (136)
- August 2024 (154)
- September 2024 (212)
- October 2024 (255)
- November 2024 (196)
- December 2024 (143)
- January 2023 (182)
- February 2023 (203)
- March 2023 (322)
- April 2023 (297)
- May 2023 (267)
- June 2023 (214)
- July 2023 (212)
- August 2023 (257)
- September 2023 (237)
- October 2023 (264)
- November 2023 (286)
- December 2023 (177)
- January 2022 (293)
- February 2022 (329)
- March 2022 (358)
- April 2022 (292)
- May 2022 (271)
- June 2022 (232)
- July 2022 (278)
- August 2022 (253)
- September 2022 (246)
- October 2022 (196)
- November 2022 (232)
- December 2022 (167)
- January 2021 (182)
- February 2021 (227)
- March 2021 (325)
- April 2021 (259)
- May 2021 (285)
- June 2021 (272)
- July 2021 (277)
- August 2021 (232)
- September 2021 (271)
- October 2021 (304)
- November 2021 (364)
- December 2021 (249)
- January 2020 (272)
- February 2020 (310)
- March 2020 (390)
- April 2020 (321)
- May 2020 (335)
- June 2020 (327)
- July 2020 (333)
- August 2020 (276)
- September 2020 (214)
- October 2020 (233)
- November 2020 (242)
- December 2020 (187)
- January 2019 (251)
- February 2019 (215)
- March 2019 (283)
- April 2019 (254)
- May 2019 (269)
- June 2019 (249)
- July 2019 (335)
- August 2019 (292)
- September 2019 (306)
- October 2019 (313)
- November 2019 (362)
- December 2019 (318)
- January 2018 (291)
- February 2018 (213)
- March 2018 (275)
- April 2018 (223)
- May 2018 (235)
- June 2018 (176)
- July 2018 (256)
- August 2018 (247)
- September 2018 (255)
- October 2018 (282)
- November 2018 (282)
- December 2018 (184)
- January 2017 (183)
- February 2017 (194)
- March 2017 (207)
- April 2017 (104)
- May 2017 (169)
- June 2017 (205)
- July 2017 (189)
- August 2017 (195)
- September 2017 (186)
- October 2017 (235)
- November 2017 (253)
- December 2017 (266)
- January 2016 (164)
- February 2016 (165)
- March 2016 (189)
- April 2016 (143)
- May 2016 (245)
- June 2016 (182)
- July 2016 (271)
- August 2016 (247)
- September 2016 (233)
- October 2016 (191)
- November 2016 (243)
- December 2016 (153)
- January 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (164)
- April 2015 (107)
- May 2015 (116)
- June 2015 (119)
- July 2015 (145)
- August 2015 (157)
- September 2015 (186)
- October 2015 (169)
- November 2015 (173)
- December 2015 (205)
- March 2014 (2)
- March 2013 (10)
- June 2013 (1)
- March 2012 (7)
- April 2012 (15)
- May 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (2)
- December 2012 (1)
