Bungoma: Kenya’s Sleeping Giant — Why This County Must Be A Designated EPZ Hub Targeting The African Region For Intra Trade

When you peer at the map of Kenya, Bungoma’s location almost seems too strategic to ignore. Nestled in western Kenya, it sits relatively close to the Uganda border and within the Lake Region Economic Bloc (LREB), giving it natural access to cross-border trade routes. It is not peripheral; it is central in corridors that link Uganda, the DRC, South Sudan, and beyond. That geography is gold — for intra-African trade, its position erases distance, reduces haulage costs, and shortens supply chains for both raw exports and processed goods.

Climate and weather in Bungoma further bolster its industrial appeal. It enjoys bimodal rainfall, with both long and short rainy seasons, and high average precipitation in many parts. That means multiple growing seasons and perennial water availability, which make it ideal not just for agriculture but for agro-industrial processing. The climatic stability reduces risks in upstream supply chains for value-added factories.

Soil is another pillar. Many parts of Bungoma have rich, fertile soils — volcanic, well-drained in upland zones, and deep enough to support staple crops, cash crops, and horticulture alike. In places like Chwele — within Bungoma — black volcanic soils produce excellent yields of maize, vegetables, coffee, and more. That gives any investor confidence that raw inputs can be sourced locally in bulk with quality.

Human resources in Bungoma are plentiful and underexploited. With a 2019 population of about 1.67 million people spread over ~3,032 km², the county has both density and scale.

Much of the younger generation is agrarian, already skilled in cultivation, post-harvest handling, and traditional processing. With proper training and certification, they can step into factory roles, logistics, supply chain, quality control, packaging, R&D, and export operations.

The literacy and education levels are a mixed but hopeful picture. Bungoma hosts institutions such as Kibabii University, multiple vocational training centers, technical institutes, and teacher training colleges.

This enables a workforce capable of transitioning to industrial and technical jobs rather than being locked in subsistence farming. With investment in skill development, Bungoma can produce technically adept laborers for mechanized processing hubs.

Access to digital infrastructure and the internet is increasingly critical. While exact metrics are scarce, Bungoma’s connectivity has been improving under national fiber rollouts and mobile network coverage. As Kenya pushes broadband expansion, Bungoma is not a backwater: it lies along key transport corridors (Webuye–Malaba, Webuye–Kitale), which often host fiber infrastructure. That makes it viable for smart factories, digital supply chain control, and export automation.

Read Also: Top 10 Investment Opportunities In Bungoma County Right Now

Infrastructure development in Bungoma is not entirely greenfield. Key national trunk roads pass through or near it (for instance, routes linking Webuye to Malaba, and Webuye–Kitale). Water sources abound — rivers like Nzoia and Malakisi traverse the county. Electricity grids already serve towns and agricultural processors (sugar mills, maize mills). The foundational network is there. What’s missing is scale, reliability, industrial feeders, logistics hubs, cold storage, and special economic zones.

On human development, Bungoma has both challenges and momentum. The county government’s SDG / VLR 2024 report emphasizes social welfare, inclusion, greater percentages of spending to health and education, and policies aimed at resilience. Poverty in Bungoma has declined (poverty headcount once ~52.9 % in older surveys, now ~35.7 %), showing room for growth. If industrial jobs raise incomes reliably, social metrics (health, child welfare, housing) can shift quickly.

Politically, Bungoma’s class has often failed to leverage these structural strengths. Leadership has been mired in patronage, piecemeal projects, and consumption rather than transformation. The county has produced good talkers, not industrial architects. Yet, local activists mention icons like Steve Biko Wafula pushing for investor orientation, critique of leadership, and development narratives that center production over politics.

Former Governor Wycliffe Wangamati left a mixed record: some roadworks and factory announcements, but often unfulfilled promises. Yet his record also includes attempts at industrial parks and infrastructure that – if refined by a successor – could be foundation stones. The youth must demand that the next leadership be technocrats, strategists, executors — oriented to jobs and growth, not handouts.

Population numbers matter. With ~1.67 million people and high density (552 persons per sq km) , Bungoma has scale. The region is not marginal. It is one of the higher-density counties in Kenya. That means local domestic demand, consumer markets, labor pools, and supply chains can be viable in situ without always exporting inbound inputs.

Now, consider what it would take to anchor an industrial hub in Bungoma. Parliament could designate the county (or corridor including parts of neighboring Kakamega, Busia, and Trans Nzoia) as an Export Processing Zone (EPZ) — meaning tax incentives, land leases, streamlined approvals, customs-free inputs, duty-free equipment, and export repos. Imagine factories for processing gold (from miners in adjacent border counties), coffee, tea, cocoa, nuts, avocado, tropical fruits, dairy, meat, timber, bamboo, textiles from cotton, agroforestry products, and artisanal goods. Because raw agricultural inputs are local, value addition (cleaning, grading, packaging, canning, cold chain, branding, shipping) yields far greater margins than raw export.

If Bungoma were to host a network of agro-processor parks employing, say, 5 million direct jobs and 15 million indirect ones across the region and supply networks, you shift the narrative. Surrounding counties feed the hub; Kenya competes for East Africa’s processed exports; young people stay, earn, contribute. For this to happen, investors must see guaranteed access to electricity, water, land, roads, skilled labor, security, export frameworks, and predictable tax regimes.

Why would any serious investor pick Bungoma? Because it combines raw material proximity, improving infrastructure, labor pool, strategic location close to regional markets, renewable water and climate advantage, and most importantly, latent upside. Many western Kenyan counties are resource-rich but underindustrialized. Bungoma can become the industrial magnet, the processing heart. Investors could realize returns that elude them in oversaturated coastal or central counties. The upside is huge.

Why has the political class failed? Because they treat politics as extraction rather than construction. They siphon resources, pursue vanity projects, neglect transformative industry, and ignore community accountability. They lack vision in sectors. The real change must come from leaders grounded in production, trade, and delivery. Steve Biko Waful’s critique — the leadership ignoring the youth, ignoring factories, focusing on ephemeral charity — is a clarion call.

Wangamati’s tenure shows the possibilities when roads are built and factory pitches attempted — even if flawed. His works, however partial, reveal a blueprint: connect wards with feeder roads, establish small industrial zones near transport arteries, seek partnerships with private firms, activate underused public land for factory estates, electrify hinterlands, and expand vocational training centers in tandem with industry demand.

Youth must align: vote not for tribal politics or handouts, but for those who can deliver industry, exports, jobs, dignity, and purpose. A leader who can secure EPZ status, anchor factories, attract investors, negotiate land and tax frameworks — that’s the choice. Yet the youth must wake up. In 2027, the vote must favor builders, technocrats, and industrialists disguised as politicians.

The creation of a Bungoma Export Processing Zone should be seen as national infrastructure, not a local favor. Kenya’s intra-African trade ambitions (with AfCFTA, East African markets, Uganda, DRC) need nodes deep in interior counties. Why ship raw goods from western Kenya to coastal ports unchecked when you can process them at source, export the value, and keep profits local?

To push this, Bungoma’s government and leaders must map out industrial corridors: perhaps Webuye–Kimilili–Mt Elgon corridor, linking to the Uganda border at Malaba, and connecting to the inland dry ports. They must build “anchor factories” — for coffee, dairy, fruit juice, fish processing, timber, bamboo, charcoal briquettes, sugar refining, essential oils — factories whose presence spawns clusters of small enterprises. They must ensure feeder infrastructure: roads, power substations, water works, sewage, logistics hubs, railway links, cold rooms, packaging centers, test labs, R&D units, and ICT hubs.

Academia in Bungoma (Kibabii University, polytechnics) must orient curricula to industrial needs: agronomy, food science, engineering, automation, quality assurance, and export compliance. Youth trained in planta, internships inside factories, and apprenticeship schemes. This internal feedback ensures the region’s human capacity grows with industrial demand.

The national government must incentivize this by constitutional designation, funding accelerator grants, preferential tax regimes, public land allocation, streamlined approvals, and infrastructure spending. Parliament needs to formalize “Bungoma Industrial Hub / EPZ zone” as a national pillar project akin to SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES in Dubai, Shenzhen, or Rwanda’s SEZ.

Politically, the region must shed weak incumbents who focus on contracts and allowances, not export strategy. Leaders like Steve Biko Wafula and Wangamati (with their respective visions and critiques) must be elevated — not as tribal figures but as industrial champions. The region must back leaders who think in gigawatts, trade corridors, comparative advantages, workforce development, global markets, not just electoral cycles.

Therefore, Bungoma is uniquely poised. Its geographic position, fertile land, water, latent human capital, improving infrastructure, and proximity to trade corridors make it ideal. The political failures so far should be the impetus to turn to leaders who can build industry. The youth must demand votes for execution, not promises. Investors must see the logic in backing Bungoma’s rise. Parliament must designate Bungoma as a national industrial hub and EPZ corridor. The region must stop asking for crumbs and start baking the economic cake — 5 million direct jobs, 15 million indirect, regional exports, dignity, growth, and transformation. That is the pitch.

Read Also: Top 15 Best Counties To Live In As A Kenyan; Imagine Bungoma & Kakamega Are Missing; Blistering Bannercals