When KSh 200 Buys Darkness: How EPRA’s New Power Charges Are Turning Electricity Into an Economic Punishment

How did we get here, as a country, where electricity, one of the most basic pillars of modern life, is slowly being turned into a privilege for those who can afford pain? EPRA has approved three fresh charges that will now follow every Kenyan into the meter: KSh 3.47 per kilowatt-hour for fuel costs, KSh 1.23 per kilowatt-hour for foreign exchange losses, and KSh 0.0154 per kilowatt-hour for a water levy. Together, these additions amount to about KSh 4.70 on every single unit of electricity before the other heavy charges already sitting on power bills are even fully felt.
This is not a small technical adjustment hidden inside energy language. This is a direct assault on household budgets, small businesses, schools, hospitals, churches, factories, salons, barbershops, cybercafes, cold rooms, welding shops and every Kenyan who depends on power to live, study, work or earn. When the cost of electricity rises sharply, the effect does not remain inside the meter. It spreads across the whole economy like a tax on breathing.
The immediate result is brutal. A family buying KSh 200 worth of tokens is now getting about 6.4 units when the same KSh 200 bought 8 units just last month. That difference may look small to people sitting in air-conditioned offices, but to ordinary families it means fewer hours of light, fewer cooked meals, less time for children to study, less power for a small fridge, and more darkness in homes already fighting inflation, school fees, rent and food prices.
The deeper tragedy is that this increase comes at a time when Kenyans are already exhausted. Salaries are not rising at the pace of taxes. Businesses are not recovering at the pace of new levies. The shilling pressure, high fuel costs, punitive taxation and weak purchasing power have already squeezed households to the wall. Then comes EPRA, adding another layer of pain and asking the public to accept it as normal regulation.
Let us call this by its proper name. It is economic punishment. It is a policy decision that transfers institutional inefficiency, fuel cost exposure, currency weakness and system losses directly to the consumer. The ordinary Kenyan did not design the power purchase agreements. The ordinary Kenyan did not mismanage energy planning. The ordinary Kenyan did not create the forex losses. Yet the ordinary Kenyan is being asked to pay for all of it through every token purchase.
The question must therefore be asked loudly and without fear: how did we get here? How did we arrive at a point where the regulator appears more comfortable passing pain to the public than defending the public from pain? How did energy pricing become a dumping ground for costs that citizens cannot audit, cannot negotiate, cannot reject and cannot escape?
Electricity is not a luxury. It is the foundation of dignity in a modern economy. It lights homes, powers hospitals, keeps medicine cold, runs school computers, keeps security lights on, powers water pumps, supports digital work, keeps shops open and enables manufacturing. When electricity becomes unaffordable, poverty deepens. When electricity becomes unpredictable or too expensive, investment slows down. When power becomes a punishment, the economy bleeds quietly.
The impact on small businesses will be immediate and painful. A barber will raise prices or close earlier. A salon will pass costs to customers who are already broke. A shopkeeper with a fridge will sell less cold stock. A welder will charge more. A cybercafe will struggle. A small bakery will price itself out of the market. A hotel will increase meal prices. The consumer will pay again and again, not only through tokens but through every product and service touched by electricity.
Manufacturing will also suffer. Kenya talks about industrialisation, jobs, exports and value addition, but no country can manufacture competitively when power costs keep rising without mercy. Every additional shilling per unit enters the cost of production. It makes locally produced goods more expensive. It weakens our competitiveness. It discourages factories. It punishes employers. It exports jobs to countries where energy planning is treated as an economic priority, not a billing experiment.
The worst part is that the public is being asked to carry costs whose details remain too technical, too hidden and too poorly explained. Fuel cost charges, forex adjustment charges and levies may appear legal on paper, but legality is not the same as justice. A charge can be lawful and still be oppressive. A tariff can follow procedure and still destroy livelihoods. A regulator can publish a notice and still fail the public interest test.
This is where the Law Society of Kenya must step in. LSK cannot watch silently as millions of consumers are pushed into deeper hardship by a policy that may make life unbearable. The legal profession exists partly to defend the public when power is exercised unfairly, irrationally, disproportionately or without sufficient regard to constitutional rights and public interest. This is one of those moments.
LSK should urgently move to court and seek orders compelling EPRA to rescind, suspend or review these charges. The matter is not merely about electricity bills; it is about economic rights, consumer protection, fair administrative action, transparency, accountability and the duty of public bodies to act reasonably. Kenyans deserve a regulator that explains, justifies and protects, not one that simply passes costs down the chain.
The court should be asked to interrogate whether the new charges are proportionate in the current economic environment. It should ask whether the public was properly heard. It should ask whether EPRA considered the cumulative burden of all existing charges on electricity. It should ask whether households and businesses can reasonably absorb a 20% to 30% spike in power bills when disposable income is already collapsing.
There must also be a serious public-interest audit of the electricity billing structure. Kenyans need to know what they are paying for, why they are paying it, who benefits from it, and whether any of the costs are avoidable. You cannot keep adding fuel costs, forex losses, levies and other charges to a power bill and still pretend the consumer is dealing with a simple electricity purchase. The bill has become a battlefield of hidden burdens.
Parliament must also stop pretending this is a normal sector issue. Energy pricing is now a cost-of-living emergency. If a KSh 200 token purchase can lose a significant portion of its value in one month, then the country is not dealing with ordinary fluctuation. It is dealing with a policy shock. MPs must summon EPRA, Kenya Power, the Ministry of Energy and the Treasury to explain how the public ended up here.
The government cannot continue preaching productivity while making production expensive. It cannot tell young people to start businesses while making electricity unaffordable. It cannot talk about digital jobs while increasing the cost of staying connected. It cannot talk about manufacturing while power prices punish every machine that turns. This contradiction is destroying the economy from the bottom up.
There is also a moral question here. What happens to the poorest family that buys tokens in small amounts because that is all they can afford? What happens to the student studying at night? What happens to the mother who needs power for a small food business? What happens to the patient whose medicine needs refrigeration? What happens to the informal trader who cannot pass costs to customers because the customers are also broke?
Policy must never be designed as if citizens are numbers on a spreadsheet. Behind every token purchase is a home, a business, a child, a patient, a dream or a struggle. When KSh 200 buys fewer units, it is not just a meter reading that changes. It is the rhythm of life inside a home that changes. It is the time a child studies. It is the cost of supper. It is the survival of a small enterprise.
EPRA must therefore be reminded that regulation is not a licence to make suffering technical. The language of tariffs, adjustments and pass-through costs should not be used to hide the human consequences of policy failure. If the system is inefficient, reform the system. If contracts are expensive, review the contracts. If planning is weak, fix planning. Do not keep punishing citizens as if they are the source of every institutional failure.
This country needs a new standard for public pricing decisions. Before any regulator approves a charge that affects millions of people, it must clearly show the impact on the poorest households, the impact on small businesses, the impact on inflation, the impact on jobs and the impact on national competitiveness. Public participation must mean more than ticking a procedural box. It must actually shape the outcome.
The demand is simple and urgent. EPRA must rescind or suspend these charges and subject them to a proper public-interest review. LSK must take legal action. Civil society must join. Consumer bodies must speak. Parliament must investigate. Kenyans must refuse to normalize a situation where electricity becomes another weapon against survival.
If nothing is done, the consequences will be severe. Power bills will rise. Businesses will transfer costs. Households will reduce consumption. Students will study less. Small enterprises will close earlier. Manufacturers will become less competitive. Inflation will spread. Poverty will deepen. And the country will keep wondering why growth figures on paper do not match the pain in ordinary homes.
How did we get here? We got here because charges were added one after another while the public was expected to adjust quietly. We got here because regulators became too comfortable speaking in technical language while citizens paid in real pain. We got here because institutions forgot that electricity is not merely a commodity; it is a lifeline.
The time for silence is over. This policy must be challenged before life becomes unbearable. EPRA must be compelled to reconsider. The Law Society of Kenya must move with urgency. Kenya cannot build an economy by switching off homes, suffocating small businesses and asking citizens to fund every failure hidden inside the power sector. When KSh 200 begins to buy darkness, a nation must stop and demand answers.
Read Also: EPRA Director General Daniel Kiptoo is Elected Chair of the Regional Power Regulatory Board
About Steve Biko Wafula
Steve Biko is the CEO OF Soko Directory and the founder of Hidalgo Group of Companies. Steve is currently developing his career in law, finance, entrepreneurship and digital consultancy; and has been implementing consultancy assignments for client organizations comprising of trainings besides capacity building in entrepreneurial matters.He can be reached on: +254 20 510 1124 or Email: info@sokodirectory.com
- January 2026 (220)
- February 2026 (248)
- March 2026 (287)
- April 2026 (208)
- May 2026 (119)
- January 2025 (119)
- February 2025 (191)
- March 2025 (212)
- April 2025 (193)
- May 2025 (161)
- June 2025 (157)
- July 2025 (227)
- August 2025 (211)
- September 2025 (270)
- October 2025 (297)
- November 2025 (230)
- December 2025 (220)
- January 2024 (238)
- February 2024 (227)
- March 2024 (190)
- April 2024 (133)
- May 2024 (157)
- June 2024 (145)
- July 2024 (136)
- August 2024 (154)
- September 2024 (212)
- October 2024 (255)
- November 2024 (196)
- December 2024 (143)
- January 2023 (182)
- February 2023 (203)
- March 2023 (322)
- April 2023 (297)
- May 2023 (267)
- June 2023 (214)
- July 2023 (212)
- August 2023 (257)
- September 2023 (237)
- October 2023 (264)
- November 2023 (286)
- December 2023 (177)
- January 2022 (293)
- February 2022 (329)
- March 2022 (358)
- April 2022 (292)
- May 2022 (271)
- June 2022 (232)
- July 2022 (278)
- August 2022 (253)
- September 2022 (246)
- October 2022 (196)
- November 2022 (232)
- December 2022 (167)
- January 2021 (182)
- February 2021 (227)
- March 2021 (325)
- April 2021 (259)
- May 2021 (285)
- June 2021 (272)
- July 2021 (277)
- August 2021 (232)
- September 2021 (271)
- October 2021 (304)
- November 2021 (364)
- December 2021 (249)
- January 2020 (272)
- February 2020 (310)
- March 2020 (390)
- April 2020 (321)
- May 2020 (335)
- June 2020 (327)
- July 2020 (333)
- August 2020 (276)
- September 2020 (214)
- October 2020 (233)
- November 2020 (242)
- December 2020 (187)
- January 2019 (251)
- February 2019 (215)
- March 2019 (283)
- April 2019 (254)
- May 2019 (269)
- June 2019 (249)
- July 2019 (335)
- August 2019 (292)
- September 2019 (306)
- October 2019 (313)
- November 2019 (362)
- December 2019 (318)
- January 2018 (291)
- February 2018 (213)
- March 2018 (275)
- April 2018 (223)
- May 2018 (235)
- June 2018 (176)
- July 2018 (256)
- August 2018 (247)
- September 2018 (255)
- October 2018 (282)
- November 2018 (282)
- December 2018 (184)
- January 2017 (183)
- February 2017 (194)
- March 2017 (207)
- April 2017 (104)
- May 2017 (169)
- June 2017 (205)
- July 2017 (189)
- August 2017 (195)
- September 2017 (186)
- October 2017 (235)
- November 2017 (253)
- December 2017 (266)
- January 2016 (164)
- February 2016 (165)
- March 2016 (189)
- April 2016 (143)
- May 2016 (245)
- June 2016 (182)
- July 2016 (271)
- August 2016 (247)
- September 2016 (233)
- October 2016 (191)
- November 2016 (243)
- December 2016 (153)
- January 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (164)
- April 2015 (107)
- May 2015 (116)
- June 2015 (119)
- July 2015 (145)
- August 2015 (157)
- September 2015 (186)
- October 2015 (169)
- November 2015 (173)
- December 2015 (205)
- March 2014 (2)
- March 2013 (10)
- June 2013 (1)
- March 2012 (7)
- April 2012 (15)
- May 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (2)
- December 2012 (1)
