Brand In Focus: Mumias Sugar Company Limited

By Juma / September 28, 2016




Mumias Sugar Company Limited was incorporated on July 1st 1971 by the Government of Kenya. Mumias Sugar was to hold majority shares of 71 percent and the minority interests being held by the Commonwealth Development Corporation with 17 percent, Kenya Commercial Finance Company with 5 percent, Booker McConnel with 4 percent and the East African Development Bank with 3 percent.

At one time, Mumias Sugar Company was the largest sugar manufacturer in Kenya producing about 250,000 metric tonnes which used to be about 42 percent of the estimated 600,000 metric tonnes annual national output.

In 2013, the company started facing some financial turmoil, one that was described is the “toughest financial moments since its inception”  with its net revenue falling to 5.4 billion shillings the same year.

Profit/Loss of Mumias Sugar Company since 2009

Mumias Sugar Company Limited has been making profits since the year 2009 but 2014 and 2015. In 2009, the company registered profits of 1,609,972 shillings and 1,572,383 shillings the following year.

In the year 2014, the company hit the news headlines when it plunged into a loss of 2,706,595 shillings and further 4,644,801 shillings in the year 2015.

See the image below:

1

Reasons for Losses At Mumias Sugar Company Limited

The company has been blaming its losses on sugarcane poaching as well as the influx of cheap sugar in the country from other countries.

During the month of June this year, the miller suspended the operations for some time citing sugarcane poaching as the main reason behind the decision. The company also blamed the availability of cheap sugar from other countries which was being packed in Mumias Sugar packets and then sold.

READ: Sugar Cane poaching forces Mumias Sugar to be shut

Analysts as well as politicians, however, blamed poor management as well as corruption as the main reason that was driving the once vibrant miller into financial oblivion.

READ: How to Curb Sugarcane Poaching

Mumias Sugar Company has been posting some mixed performances at the NSE. At some point being among the top gainers of the day and at times, being among the top losers.

READ: Mumias Sugar Company Top Gainer of The Day at the NSE

On the 8th of September this year, for instance, the company was the top gainer of that day with 10.00 percent at the price of 1.10 shillings per share. The same happened on the 3rd of June with a gain of 7.69 percent at the price of 1.40 shillings per share.

On the 25th of May, however, it was the top loser with 7.14 percent at the price of 1.30 shillings per share but featured among the most traded in shares with a volume of 1.73 million.

See the image below:

2

N/B

B- Gain/Loss in %

P- Price in shillings

On the way to Recovery

Mumias Sugar Company is on a massive recovery program helped by the government which gave out one billion shillings last year as a bailout for the ailing miller.

The management has also said that it is working on the issue of paying sugarcane farmers on time so as to prevent them falling prey of the competitors in the same field who pay on time and at times even before cutting the cane.

Solution for the Sugar Industry woes in Kenya

According to an article  on one of the local dailies, a UN agency said that the solution to the problems facing the Kenya’s sugar industry lied in the lowering of production costs and not in the protection of sugarcane farmers.

 



About Juma

Juma is an enthusiastic journalist who believes that journalism has power to change the world either negatively or positively depending on how one uses it.(020) 528 0222 or Email: [email protected]

View other posts by Juma


More Articles From This Author








Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE

ARCHIVES

2019
  • January 2019 (256)
  • February 2019 (216)
  • March 2019 (285)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (272)
  • June 2019 (252)
  • July 2019 (151)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (219)
  • March 2018 (278)
  • April 2018 (225)
  • May 2018 (238)
  • June 2018 (178)
  • July 2018 (257)
  • August 2018 (249)
  • September 2018 (256)
  • October 2018 (287)
  • November 2018 (284)
  • December 2018 (187)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (195)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (206)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (165)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (190)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (246)
  • June 2016 (183)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (249)
  • September 2016 (234)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (166)
  • April 2015 (109)
  • May 2015 (117)
  • June 2015 (121)
  • July 2015 (150)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (189)
  • October 2015 (170)
  • November 2015 (174)
  • December 2015 (208)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950