Barclays Bank Records 19.8 Percent Drop in EPS To KSH 0.32

By Soko Directory Team / May 29, 2017



Barclays Bank

Barclays Bank recorded a 19.8Percent y/y drop in 1Q17 EPS to 0.32 shillings.

The bank’s Net Interest Income (NII) and Non-Interest Revenue (NIR) were disappointing after declining 7.1 percent y/y and 7.8 percent y/y (respectively). Performance was stabilized by flat cost growth. Overall, performance was below expectation with elevated NPLs remaining a key concern.
The Flat cost growth was at 0.9 percent y/y. Staff costs were up 1.7 percent y/y with other operating costs down 7.9 percent y/y.  Overall, Cost to Income (CTI) was at 55.5 percent, in line with our FY17 expectation of 53.6 percent. Economic experts expect the bank to record significant cost uptick though we expect upward CTI pressure to be mainly from declining income.

Some of the negatives that accompanied the results are:

  1. 8 percent y/y drop in NIR. Contrary to our expectations, NIR lines returned poor numbers with fee and commission income down 11.8 percent y/y and other operating income down 55.6 percent (most likely related to one-off income in 1Q16). FOREX income was up 19 percent y/y. With a poor start to the year, we are likely to cut our FY17 growth expectation from 3.5 percent y/y to flat growth.
  2. 700 bps q/q cut in Net Interest Margin (NIM) to 9 percent. Balance sheet growth remained flat over the quarter with deposits and loans up 1.9 percent q/q and 0.1 percent q/q (respectively). Similar to other Tier 1 banks, impact on NIM was from declined loan WAIR which settled at 12.1 percent from 12.4 percent in 4Q16 and 13.6 percent in 1Q16. The cost of Funds remained stable q/q at 2.6 percent. In the view of economic experts, 1Q17 numbers across the industry have revealed stiff competition on loan pricing and resulted in unprecedented levels of NIM erosion. Economic experts expect to revise our NIM forecasts downwards to reflect this outcome. Currently, FY17 NIM forecast stands at 9.9 percent which we expect to revise to about 9 percent.
  3. NPL still elevated at 6.9 percent.Gross NPLs were up 48.4 percent y/y and 2.1 percent q/q. As at FY16, management had indicated NPLs were mainly from the retail sector. Going forward, management was looking to stiffen their screening process to protect the bank though this is yet to bear fruit. The bank’s NPL ratio was above our FY17 forecast of 6 percent.  Economic experts anticipate revising this upwards unless 2Q17 shows further weakness. We note the bank’s strategy is still aggressive compared to historically with loans as a percent of total assets still high at 64.7 percent compared to historical average of 58.9 percent. Considering the lost market share over the years due to a conservative strategy, we do not expect the bank to revert back to sub-60 percent levels.


About Soko Directory Team

Soko Directory is a Financial and Markets digital portal that tracks brands, listed firms on the NSE, SMEs and trend setters in the markets eco-system.Find us on Facebook: facebook.com/SokoDirectory and on Twitter: twitter.com/SokoDirectory

View other posts by Soko Directory Team


More Articles From This Author








Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE

ARCHIVES

2019
  • January 2019 (256)
  • February 2019 (216)
  • March 2019 (285)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (272)
  • June 2019 (252)
  • July 2019 (340)
  • August 2019 (151)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (219)
  • March 2018 (278)
  • April 2018 (225)
  • May 2018 (238)
  • June 2018 (178)
  • July 2018 (257)
  • August 2018 (249)
  • September 2018 (256)
  • October 2018 (287)
  • November 2018 (284)
  • December 2018 (187)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (195)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (205)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (165)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (190)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (246)
  • June 2016 (183)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (249)
  • September 2016 (234)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (166)
  • April 2015 (109)
  • May 2015 (117)
  • June 2015 (121)
  • July 2015 (150)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (189)
  • October 2015 (170)
  • November 2015 (174)
  • December 2015 (208)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950