Kenyans Are Accumulating Personal Debts to Dangerous Levels

By Korir Isaac / May 8, 2019




The rate which Kenyans are accumulating personal debts is alarming and experts have warned that it is significantly threatening their own financial stability.

The same way the government has an insatiable appetite for foreign debts, the citizens are also fond of quick loans.

Take for instance Safaricom’s new overdraft service, Fuliza. Within a month of its launch, the service had run through 6.2 billion shillings, 29 billion in three months and an unbelievable 45 billion shillings in six months to borrowers.

Apparently, the majority of these individuals who have made the credit situation serious are the unemployed youth who continue to borrow through the multiple mobile phone-based platforms.

Experts also say that low-income earners who either do not have clear repayment plans or irregular income are also among the lot.

READ ALSO: Kenyans are Surviving on Loans that Majority are Defaulting on-CBK report

The borrowed funds are typically used by these vulnerable individuals to get out of a quick fix. They use the money for betting, others use them to pay for school fees, rent, and food.

Only a few of them think of pumping the cash into small businesses and at the end of the day, most of the cash goes wasted.

Sam Omukoko, the managing director of Metropol Corporation, a Credit Reference Bureau (CRB) based in Nairobi, who has been monitoring the borrowing spree is amazed at how Kenyans are accumulating personal debts.

“This thing will soon reach boiling point,” he warns, “an average Kenyan these days has at least five or more accounts, ranging from the bank, Sacco and a number of mobile phone-based platforms”.

Omukoko noted that some of these individuals are unable to repay their debts and are likely to find themselves uncreditworthy soon.

The Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) data and reports from other stakeholders reveal that most of the money borrowed is used for consumerism, that is, borrowing for food expenses, recreation as well as other basic current expenditure, and not for venturing into business.

“There is an emerging trend of many borrowers resorting to dodging their financiers, and even worse, in a typical survival tactic of robbing Peter to pay Paul; borrowing from one platform to pay another,” Omukoko said.

He further added that for others, taking flight from the creditors by registering multiple mobile numbers for use when they feel cornered by their creditors, is their best survival tactic.

It is for this reason that entities like Metropol CRBs were started. The body collects information they have on a borrower and converts it into a credit score used to measure if one is eligible for a loan from a lender.

Metropol and other CRBs have become so vital to lenders since they utilize the score of an individual to evaluate potential borrowers.

The score, which ranges between 200 and 900 has rating with remarks from poor to excellent, tells them about the person.

Many of the vulnerable— and with some unaware of some unsettled mundane credit— have found themselves blacklisted because of poor credit scores.

SEE ALSO: Mobile Loans Apps In Kenya: The Curse Disguised As The Savior 

Rate of Loan Defaults

Kamau Kunyiha, chief executive of CreditInfo, says that although the rate of default on mobile phone-based platforms was low standing at around 9.6 percent by the end of 2018, the worry is the growing trend in which people are borrowing to retire existing credit.

“It is a fact that people are multi-borrowing, but the issue is we do not know to what extent,” he said.

Kunyiha noted that currently, 97 percent of the money lent through the mobile loan apps supported by banks and that there is no immediate threat to the financial system.

He reckons that much of the debt is, in most occasions, repaid with just about a million Kenyans blacklisted.

Part of the reason why Kenyans do not pay back their debts is that they did not get any value from it, and this is because they spent the amount on recurrent expenditure.

SIMILAR CONTENT: Kenyans Borrowing Recklessly to Maintain Lavish Lifestyles

“There is no growth value proposition from the amounts borrowed as they are mostly used to plug into recurrent expenditures and not for development purposes. Also, the cost of credit is very high,” an analyst at Financial Sector Deepening (FSD), an organization that follows issues on debt and financial inclusion noted.

The lending market in Kenya has today been dominated by mobile loan apps owned by entities rushing to fill up the lending space left by traditional banking ever since the law capping interest rates was introduced.

There are at least 49 digital lending platforms giving out between 50 to 50,000 shillings. Some of them include MShwari, Fuliza, KCB-MPesa, Tala, Branch, Okash, Stawika, and Saida.

Since its inception in 2012, Safaricom’s Mshwari has disbursed a total of 230 billion shillings whereas KCB, one of the country’s largest financial institutions, now advances 90 percent of its loans through its mobile platform KCB M-Pesa.

RELATED CONTENT: Bad Debt: The Big Ideas Syndrome 

Meanwhile, experts have stated that the niche in which these digital lending platforms carry their operation is too fluid and it needs to self- regulate to check predatory lending practices before the government steps in.

The guidelines should be focused on consumer awareness and education on the cost of digital credit and terms and conditions of the loans.

Consecutively, the regulations should also champion an awareness program on how to effectively use the funds borrowed from mobile loan apps.



About Korir Isaac

A creative, tenacious, and passionate journalist with impeccable ethics and a nose for anticipated and spontaneous news. He may not say it, but he sure can make one hell of a story.

View other posts by Korir Isaac


More Articles From This Author








Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE

ARCHIVES

2019
  • January 2019 (256)
  • February 2019 (216)
  • March 2019 (287)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (273)
  • June 2019 (138)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (219)
  • March 2018 (278)
  • April 2018 (225)
  • May 2018 (238)
  • June 2018 (178)
  • July 2018 (257)
  • August 2018 (249)
  • September 2018 (256)
  • October 2018 (287)
  • November 2018 (284)
  • December 2018 (187)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (195)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (206)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (165)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (190)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (246)
  • June 2016 (183)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (249)
  • September 2016 (234)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (166)
  • April 2015 (109)
  • May 2015 (117)
  • June 2015 (121)
  • July 2015 (150)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (189)
  • October 2015 (170)
  • November 2015 (174)
  • December 2015 (208)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950