Investing Now For The Tax Audit Of The Future

By Soko Directory Team / December 20, 2019 | 9:29 am



Turnover tax

Transfer Pricing is one of the hottest tax issues globally, and Africa is no exception.  Globally transfer pricing has a bad reputation due to the perceived deliberate mispricing of intra-group transactions for tax avoidance purposes.

In its simplest form transfer pricing is how companies price intra-group transactions between different countries, therefore affecting taxable profits in those different countries. In this regard, transfer pricing is simply part of a multinationals tax compliance relating to its day-to-day intra-group commercial transactions.

For some time now, because of perceived abuse in Africa, many African countries have introduced transfer pricing regulations and have been investing in transfer pricing capability.

These initiatives have been complemented by the global dialogue on transfer pricing, and the tax environment in Africa has been further influenced by the OECD BEPS project and Africa’s involvement under the Inclusive Framework.

Vicki Bales, Transfer Pricing Director at DLA Piper UK, says “African Tax Authorities have transformed their transfer pricing capabilities, and therefore their expectations in audits.  This means companies need to respond and develop their own capability and experience in tandem, as the expectations of tax inspectors have changed.  Taxpayers should prepare today for future audits. This means collecting information now, whilst people are available and it’s fresh in their minds.  It also means anticipating the speed at which capacity is developing within tax administrations. Particularly countries benefiting from technical assistance from the OECD, World Bank, IMF, Tax Inspectors without Borders and bilateral assistance”.

Ask yourself: Am I audit ready?

First, self-assess your risk by asking yourself: do you have transactions with low tax countries, significant intra-group royalty, service or interest payments, or losses resulting from intercompany transactions?

For all of your related party transactions, can you explain your pricing? Do you have good quality transfer pricing documentation, policies and evidence to demonstrate your position?

Secondly, once you’ve identified your risks, ask yourself: How do I prepare for a transfer pricing audit? Bales comments by saying: “Think about how you present your company and your position in a tax audit. Many corporates we speak to believe that, in this tax environment of unprecedented change, now is the time for good compliance, good consistent implementation, good (or very good!) fact-finding, and then proactively presenting all these to manage tax audits.”   

Third, build on-going governance processes to maintain and support your transfer pricing positions. This can be facilitated through an in-house annual cycle operated by tax or finance.   The benefit is to check the facts underlying the original policy and pricing are still valid and collect on-going facts to use as evidence in the audit.

You’re in an audit, now what?

During the audit, one of the most common issues is identifying, proving and agreeing to facts. As simple as it sounds, it takes time to make sure your facts and commercial story are clear, then, how do the transfer pricing and calculations follow from those facts.  If you’re in audit, and it feels like there’s no progress, ask yourself, have the facts presented been understood, can you do anything to improve this? Bales adds: “In helping the tax inspector, you are probably helping yourself, because, if you don’t provide information as needed then assumptions may be made.  Undoing wrong assumptions can be costly, time-consuming and set a negative tone for the rest of an audit when perhaps there was no need for this to happen.”

Secondly, does the transaction fall under a double tax treaty?  If it does and the audit isn’t progressing, then, using the treaty as a basis to bring in the other Tax Authority can create a more balanced two-sided review of the facts and transfer pricing.  This is using the Mutual Agreement Procedure (“MAP”) in the treaty.

Joel Cooper, Partner DLA Piper and co-author of the World Bank book on transfer pricing in developing countries, says “MAP is something taxpayers need to push for, particularly in Africa.  The way to do this is by filing MAP cases, not waiting for change. The resources and capacity of the tax administrations to deal with MAP will follow. Whilst the outcome of the MAP may be uncertain, in terms of timing and result, the outcome of not filing MAP is often certain – double taxation”

Making a long term investment in transfer pricing expertise

Every country in the world is responding to changes in Transfer Pricing, not just Africa.  But the scale and pace of African capability development mean Africa stands out.  African Tax Authorities have been empowered by BEPS, the Inclusive Framework, and their governments to challenge transfer pricing.

Whilst the global tax environment continues to evolve, companies are advised to take the risk self-assessment steps we describe above and consider partnering with a firm like DLA Piper that combines its local tax capabilities in Africa with its international transfer pricing team.

Caleb Langat, Tax Partner, IKM Kenya | DLA Piper Africa, says “African businesses are powering ahead and growing into regional groups; getting transfer pricing right when you’re growing is an investment that pays off in the long term.”

The author is Caleb Langat, Tax Partner, IKM Kenya | DLA Piper Africa





About Soko Directory Team

Soko Directory is a Financial and Markets digital portal that tracks brands, listed firms on the NSE, SMEs and trend setters in the markets eco-system.Find us on Facebook: facebook.com/SokoDirectory and on Twitter: twitter.com/SokoDirectory

View other posts by Soko Directory Team


More Articles From This Author







Trending Stories










Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE



ARCHIVES

2020
  • January 2020 (204)
  • 2019
  • January 2019 (255)
  • February 2019 (216)
  • March 2019 (285)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (272)
  • June 2019 (251)
  • July 2019 (339)
  • August 2019 (293)
  • September 2019 (306)
  • October 2019 (313)
  • November 2019 (362)
  • December 2019 (320)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (219)
  • March 2018 (278)
  • April 2018 (225)
  • May 2018 (238)
  • June 2018 (178)
  • July 2018 (256)
  • August 2018 (249)
  • September 2018 (256)
  • October 2018 (287)
  • November 2018 (284)
  • December 2018 (185)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (194)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (205)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (165)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (190)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (245)
  • June 2016 (182)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (248)
  • September 2016 (234)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (166)
  • April 2015 (108)
  • May 2015 (116)
  • June 2015 (120)
  • July 2015 (148)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (188)
  • October 2015 (169)
  • November 2015 (173)
  • December 2015 (207)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950