Skip to content
Government and Policy

Captain Traore – The Revolutionary And Ruto – The Neocolonial Custodian: Africa At Crossroads

BY Steve Biko Wafula · January 13, 2025 06:01 am

In the sprawling chessboard of African leadership, two players emerge with striking contrasts: Captain Ibrahim Traoré, the fiery leader of Burkina Faso, and William Ruto, the self-proclaimed hustler-in-chief of Kenya. Both ascended to power under unique circumstances, yet their styles of governance could not be more polar. One embodies hope and defiance against the vestiges of colonialism, while the other seems to kneel, cap in hand, begging for Western approval.

Traoré, the 35-year-old military captain, stormed onto the stage as a beacon of anti-imperialist resolve, a leader who doesn’t just speak for his people but bleeds for them. Meanwhile, Ruto, a career politician, has perfected the art of polishing boots—Western ones, to be precise—while selling his people’s future in well-rehearsed speeches sprinkled with Bible verses. In two years, both leaders have etched their marks on their nations, but what a difference those marks are!

Traoré’s Burkina Faso, though battered and bruised by years of foreign meddling, is now a nation unshackled from its past. Traoré doesn’t host endless donor conferences to beg for alms while wearing the garb of humility; he doesn’t need to. Instead, he told the French to pack their bags, dismantled the colonial military bases, and rallied his people around the dream of true sovereignty. His vision for democracy isn’t imported; it’s forged from the will of his people, rooted in African traditions of collective decision-making.

Read Also: Ruto and Kindiki’s Leadership Has Fueled the Surge In Crime And Lawlessness Across Kenya

Ruto, on the other hand, is democracy’s greatest salesman—or perhaps its clown. Kenya’s democracy under his watch has become a Broadway play with theatrics, fake tears, and a predictable script. His government is a merry-go-round of incompetence and corruption, spun to the dizzying tune of public debt. He calls himself the “chief hustler,” but his hustle seems to involve hustling Kenyans out of their dignity, land, and future.

When Traoré speaks of self-reliance, he doesn’t preach; he acts. He mobilized his people to rebuild their nation, turning every Burkinabé into a soldier, not just in arms but in spirit. Schools and hospitals, once neglected, are being restored—not by foreign contractors but by local hands. Traoré’s governance isn’t perfect, but it’s authentic. It’s a breath of fresh air in a continent suffocating under the weight of leaders who dream in foreign currencies.

Ruto, in stark contrast, has perfected the art of optics. He wears his suit like a second skin, a man more comfortable at Davos than in the drought-stricken fields of Turkana. He waxes lyrical about climate action but then opens the door wide for multinationals to plunder Kenya’s natural resources. His policies are a patchwork quilt of borrowed ideas, stitched together by technocrats who answer not to Kenyans but to faceless donors in Brussels and Washington.

Traoré’s Burkina Faso is a nation in transition, but the trajectory is upward. His people, once resigned to despair, now dare to dream of a brighter future. The youth see in him a leader who values their lives over his comfort, a man who doesn’t fear the wrath of the West because his loyalty lies with Africa. He has united a nation by giving them something far more valuable than aid: dignity.

Ruto’s Kenya, meanwhile, is stuck in a quicksand of misplaced priorities. The grand infrastructure projects he champions are less about solving Kenya’s problems and more about padding the pockets of his cronies. His government is a masterclass in neoliberal economics: privatize the gains, socialize the losses, and blame the opposition when things fall apart.

Perhaps the starkest contrast between the two leaders lies in their visions for Africa. Traoré dreams of an Africa free from the chains of neocolonialism, an Africa that controls its resources and writes its destiny. Ruto, on the other hand, seems content to play the middleman in Africa’s continued exploitation. Under his watch, Kenya has become a testing ground for every failed Western policy, from carbon credits to green bonds that enrich everyone except Kenyans.

It’s comedic, really, how Ruto’s speeches often begin with the phrase, “As a hustler,” as if his humble beginnings absolve him of his failures. The hustler narrative has become a farce, a smokescreen to distract Kenyans from the harsh reality of rising taxes, skyrocketing food prices, and the daily grind of survival. If Ruto is a hustler, then Kenyans are the hustled.

Traoré’s Burkina Faso stands as a bold experiment in what African leadership could be if it were untethered from the apron strings of foreign powers. It’s messy, it’s imperfect, but it’s undeniably African. In two years, Traoré has achieved what many leaders fail to do in a lifetime: he has given his people a reason to believe.

Ruto, in his two years, has achieved a different kind of feat: he has managed to alienate almost every segment of Kenyan society. Farmers are up in arms over misguided agricultural policies, small businesses are crushed under the weight of taxation, and the youth are drowning in hopelessness. His government’s accomplishments, if one could call them that, are monuments to mediocrity.

So, what kind of leadership is good for Africa? The answer lies not in the polished rhetoric of career politicians but in the raw, unfiltered actions of leaders like Traoré. Africa doesn’t need more technocrats who measure success by GDP growth while their people go hungry. It needs visionaries who prioritize sovereignty over handouts, dignity over dependency, and action over applause.

Traoré is not perfect, and neither is Burkina Faso. But his leadership is a rallying cry for a continent yearning to break free. Ruto, on the other hand, is a cautionary tale, a reminder of what happens when leaders prioritize personal ambition over public service.

In the end, Africans must decide what kind of future they want: one built on the solid foundation of self-reliance and dignity, or one propped up by the shaky scaffolding of neocolonialism. Traoré represents the former; Ruto, the latter. The choice is ours.

Read Also: Recycled Old Leadership: The Roadblock To Western Kenya’s Progress

Steve Biko is the CEO OF Soko Directory and the founder of Hidalgo Group of Companies. Steve is currently developing his career in law, finance, entrepreneurship and digital consultancy; and has been implementing consultancy assignments for client organizations comprising of trainings besides capacity building in entrepreneurial matters. He can be reached on: +254 20 510 1124 or Email: info@sokodirectory.com

Trending Stories
Related Articles
Explore Soko Directory
Soko Directory Archives