Trump’s Warning To BRICS: An Empty Threat Or A Real Economic War?

KEY POINTS
Trump’s approach also risks alienating key U.S. allies. Brazil, South Africa, and India are all major democracies and have historical trade ties with the U.S.. Pushing them towards China and Russia by imposing extreme tariffs would be strategically unwise for U.S. foreign policy.
Donald Trump’s warning to BRICS nations about imposing 100% tariffs if they attempt to replace the U.S. dollar in international trade has sent shockwaves across the global financial landscape. The former U.S. president, known for his aggressive stance on economic policies, did not mince words in his Truth Social post, declaring that any country backing a BRICS currency should expect economic retaliation in the form of high tariffs. But is this a credible threat, or is it simply another populist outburst meant to reinforce America’s dominance in global trade?
For decades, the U.S. dollar has maintained its status as the world’s primary reserve currency, accounting for over 58% of global foreign exchange reserves according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). This dominance has given the U.S. a unique advantage in global trade, allowing it to impose sanctions, influence financial flows, and dictate international economic policies. However, the BRICS bloc—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—has been actively working on de-dollarization efforts, challenging U.S. economic supremacy.
BRICS nations have been exploring the creation of an alternative currency for years, largely driven by geopolitical and economic tensions with the U.S. Russia and China, in particular, have been leading the charge in reducing their dependence on the dollar, especially after U.S. sanctions on Russia over the Ukraine war and Washington’s broader economic rivalry with Beijing. According to reports, trade settlements in non-dollar currencies among BRICS members have increased by over 30% in the last five years.
Trump’s statement underscores the U.S. fear of losing its economic leverage. A successful BRICS currency would weaken the Federal Reserve’s control over global liquidity and potentially reduce demand for U.S. Treasury bonds, which are a key component of America’s debt financing strategy. This could spell disaster for the U.S. economy, which currently carries a national debt of over $34 trillion.
Read Also: Donald Trump To Launch His Social Media Platform
But how realistic is a 100% tariff on BRICS countries? Such a move would have devastating consequences, not just for BRICS economies, but also for American businesses and consumers. China alone accounts for over 15% of total U.S. imports, with bilateral trade between the two nations exceeding $650 billion annually. A blanket tariff would trigger massive inflation in the U.S., as American consumers and industries rely heavily on cheap imports from BRICS nations.
Moreover, many U.S. multinational corporations operate in BRICS countries. Companies like Apple, Tesla, and Boeing source raw materials and manufacture products in China and India. A tariff war would force these companies to relocate supply chains, significantly increasing operational costs. Historically, tariff escalations have led to economic recessions—as seen in Trump’s 2018 trade war with China, which cost U.S. businesses and consumers an estimated $316 billion over two years.
Another challenge to Trump’s threat is the growing influence of BRICS in global trade. The bloc is expanding, with countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran, UAE, Egypt, and Argentina expressing interest in joining. This expansion could create a strong economic alliance controlling over 45% of global oil production, 35% of world GDP, and half of the world’s population. A BRICS currency backed by gold, rare earth metals, or commodities could pose a serious challenge to the petrodollar system.
While Trump insists that no country can replace the U.S. dollar in international trade, the reality is more nuanced. The Chinese yuan is already gaining traction in global trade settlements, with over $7 trillion worth of transactions settled in yuan in 2023 alone. Russia and China have increased their bilateral trade in rubles and yuan by 80% in the last two years, significantly reducing their reliance on the dollar.
Furthermore, the rise of digital currencies and blockchain technology could accelerate de-dollarization efforts. China’s digital yuan (e-CNY) is already being tested in cross-border payments, and other BRICS nations are exploring Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). If BRICS can create a secure, efficient, and widely accepted digital currency, it could bypass the SWIFT system, limiting U.S. financial influence.
Trump’s rhetoric about “hostile countries” betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of global economics. The world is increasingly multipolar, with China, India, and Russia emerging as dominant economic players. The assumption that the U.S. can dictate global trade terms unilaterally is outdated. Even European countries, traditionally aligned with the U.S., are exploring trade in non-dollar currencies due to Washington’s unpredictable economic policies.
If Trump follows through on his 100% tariff threat, it could trigger a major global economic crisis. The World Trade Organization (WTO) and International Chamber of Commerce would likely challenge such tariffs as illegal trade barriers, leading to diplomatic disputes. Moreover, BRICS nations could retaliate by slashing investments in U.S. assets, further destabilizing Wall Street and the dollar.
The biggest question is whether a BRICS currency can succeed. While the idea is ambitious, internal differences within BRICS could pose challenges. China and India, for example, have territorial disputes, and economic policies among BRICS nations are not harmonized. Creating a common monetary policy, exchange rate mechanism, and financial infrastructure requires deep cooperation, which remains uncertain.
However, even if a unified BRICS currency doesn’t materialize, the trend towards de-dollarization is irreversible. Countries are diversifying foreign reserves away from the dollar, and bilateral trade agreements in local currencies are increasing. The dollar’s dominance is shrinking, and Trump’s threats—whether enacted or not—will likely accelerate the global move away from dollar dependency.
Trump’s approach also risks alienating key U.S. allies. Brazil, South Africa, and India are all major democracies and have historical trade ties with the U.S.. Pushing them towards China and Russia by imposing extreme tariffs would be strategically unwise for U.S. foreign policy.
Ultimately, Trump’s statement is a classic example of economic nationalism that may play well to his domestic base, but it overlooks the realities of global trade. The world has changed, and economic coercion is no longer as effective as it once was. BRICS nations are too economically significant to be bullied into submission. Instead of issuing threats, the U.S. should be exploring economic diplomacy and collaborating on trade policies that ensure mutual benefit.
Whether Trump’s 100% tariff threat is just campaign rhetoric or a genuine policy remains to be seen. However, one thing is clear: the global economic order is shifting, and the days of U.S. dollar supremacy being unchallenged are rapidly fading.
Read Also: A Dramatic First Day With Trump As The President Of The USA with Global Ripples
About Steve Biko Wafula
Steve Biko is the CEO OF Soko Directory and the founder of Hidalgo Group of Companies. Steve is currently developing his career in law, finance, entrepreneurship and digital consultancy; and has been implementing consultancy assignments for client organizations comprising of trainings besides capacity building in entrepreneurial matters. He can be reached on: +254 20 510 1124 or Email: info@sokodirectory.com
- January 2025 (118)
- February 2025 (74)
- January 2024 (238)
- February 2024 (227)
- March 2024 (190)
- April 2024 (133)
- May 2024 (157)
- June 2024 (145)
- July 2024 (136)
- August 2024 (154)
- September 2024 (212)
- October 2024 (255)
- November 2024 (196)
- December 2024 (143)
- January 2023 (182)
- February 2023 (203)
- March 2023 (322)
- April 2023 (298)
- May 2023 (268)
- June 2023 (214)
- July 2023 (212)
- August 2023 (257)
- September 2023 (237)
- October 2023 (264)
- November 2023 (286)
- December 2023 (177)
- January 2022 (293)
- February 2022 (329)
- March 2022 (358)
- April 2022 (292)
- May 2022 (271)
- June 2022 (232)
- July 2022 (278)
- August 2022 (253)
- September 2022 (246)
- October 2022 (196)
- November 2022 (232)
- December 2022 (167)
- January 2021 (182)
- February 2021 (227)
- March 2021 (325)
- April 2021 (259)
- May 2021 (285)
- June 2021 (272)
- July 2021 (277)
- August 2021 (232)
- September 2021 (271)
- October 2021 (304)
- November 2021 (364)
- December 2021 (249)
- January 2020 (272)
- February 2020 (310)
- March 2020 (390)
- April 2020 (321)
- May 2020 (335)
- June 2020 (327)
- July 2020 (333)
- August 2020 (276)
- September 2020 (214)
- October 2020 (233)
- November 2020 (242)
- December 2020 (187)
- January 2019 (251)
- February 2019 (215)
- March 2019 (283)
- April 2019 (254)
- May 2019 (269)
- June 2019 (249)
- July 2019 (335)
- August 2019 (293)
- September 2019 (306)
- October 2019 (313)
- November 2019 (362)
- December 2019 (318)
- January 2018 (291)
- February 2018 (213)
- March 2018 (275)
- April 2018 (223)
- May 2018 (235)
- June 2018 (176)
- July 2018 (256)
- August 2018 (247)
- September 2018 (255)
- October 2018 (282)
- November 2018 (282)
- December 2018 (184)
- January 2017 (183)
- February 2017 (194)
- March 2017 (207)
- April 2017 (104)
- May 2017 (169)
- June 2017 (205)
- July 2017 (189)
- August 2017 (195)
- September 2017 (186)
- October 2017 (235)
- November 2017 (253)
- December 2017 (266)
- January 2016 (164)
- February 2016 (165)
- March 2016 (189)
- April 2016 (143)
- May 2016 (245)
- June 2016 (182)
- July 2016 (271)
- August 2016 (247)
- September 2016 (233)
- October 2016 (191)
- November 2016 (243)
- December 2016 (153)
- January 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (164)
- April 2015 (107)
- May 2015 (116)
- June 2015 (119)
- July 2015 (145)
- August 2015 (157)
- September 2015 (186)
- October 2015 (169)
- November 2015 (173)
- December 2015 (205)
- March 2014 (2)
- March 2013 (10)
- June 2013 (1)
- March 2012 (7)
- April 2012 (15)
- May 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (2)
- December 2012 (1)