Africa Is Not Poor But Poorly Led, Not Weak But Weakened By Those Elected To Defend Her Dignity

In the heart of Africa, a continent endowed with immense natural wealth, the paradox of poverty amidst plenty persists. This contradiction is not due to a lack of resources but stems from systemic failures in governance and leadership. The political class, entrusted with the stewardship of these resources, has often prioritized personal gain over national development, leading to widespread disenfranchisement of the African populace.​

Consider the case of Zambia, which sold one of its mines, KCM, for a mere $25 million in 2003. The new Indian owner recouped $75 million in just three months, and the mine now generates close to $500 million annually. Such transactions highlight a pattern where African assets are undervalued and sold off, depriving nations of long-term revenue streams.​

Similarly, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) spends $79 million annually importing chickens from Poland, despite neighboring Tanzania having 132,000 tons of poultry. Mozambique sources 60% of its wine from Portugal, overlooking South Africa’s production of 770 million liters yearly. These examples underscore a broader issue: African countries often bypass regional trade opportunities, favoring distant partners over neighboring nations.​

Read Also: A Continent Held Hostage: How 5,000 Greedy Bastards Are Bleeding 1.5 Billion Africans Dry

The Ivory Coast, the world’s largest cocoa producer, exports $462 million worth of cocoa to France. France then processes this cocoa into chocolates, generating $1.4 billion in revenue. If the Ivory Coast developed its processing capabilities, it could potentially earn $1.8 billion annually, retaining more value within the country.​

Kenya’s importation of wheat and maize worth $250 million from Russia in 2023, despite Tanzania’s surplus of 2.1 million tonnes of maize, exemplifies missed opportunities for intra-African trade. Such decisions not only drain foreign exchange reserves but also hinder regional economic integration.​

Fuel imports present another area of concern. Fifteen SADC nations collectively spend $2.6 billion monthly on fuel from the UAE and Asia. Yet, Angola, with 9 billion barrels of oil reserves, could supply the entire region if adequate refining infrastructure were in place. Indian middlemen have perpetuated narratives about Angolan oil being “dirty,” discouraging regional utilization.​

The DRC’s annual expenditure of $136 million on oil from Belgium, while neighboring Angola remains underutilized, and Malawi’s importation of 150,000 kg of rice from India, despite Tanzania and Madagascar being leading producers, further illustrate the neglect of regional resources.​

South Africa spends $197 million yearly on chicken from Brazil, even though Botswana, Tanzania, and Zambia could collectively meet this demand. Tanzania’s $13 million annual expenditure on alcohol from France and the UK overlooks South Africa’s production of 775 million liters of wine. Angola imports milk from Portugal and New Zealand, despite South Africa producing 3.3 billion liters annually. Mozambique’s $94 million expenditure on Russian wheat ignores Zambia’s surplus of over 250,000 tons.​

Malawi’s recent ban on flour from Tanzania, while spending over $40 million on cereal from the UAE, and South Africa’s $1.6 billion expenditure on fuel and products from Brazil, despite Angola’s capacity, highlight policy inconsistencies that favor external partners over regional collaboration.​

Zambia’s daily copper exports, Botswana’s 30-year diamond exports, and Zimbabwe’s gold exports to China since the Mao era amount to $109 billion exiting SADC shores annually. South Africa’s $262 million annual beef imports from Brazil, despite Botswana’s 14,000-ton capacity, and Angola’s $56 million expenditure on fish from Portugal, overlooking Namibia’s status as the largest fish producer, further emphasize the neglect of regional resources.​

Malawi’s $48 million grain imports from the UAE, despite Tanzania’s production, and Angola’s $57 million fish imports from Argentina, despite Namibia’s capacity, represent $173 million that could circulate within SADC economies. Zambia’s purchase of 360 million liters of Saudi fuel, Angola’s $500 million expenditure on Brazilian beef, and Mozambique’s $312 million coal imports, despite Zimbabwe’s resources, are missed opportunities for regional economic strengthening.​

The SADC region, comprising 16 countries with a combined population of 363 million, spends $2 billion monthly on fuel imports. Redirecting this expenditure to support Angola’s refinery development could retain wealth within the region, fostering economic growth and reducing dependency on external partners.​

The oil industry in SADC is often influenced by Indian intermediaries who discourage the use of Angolan oil, labeling it as substandard. This narrative undermines regional self-sufficiency and perpetuates dependency on external sources. Angola’s 2.6 billion barrels of oil reserves could meet regional demand if supported by adequate refining infrastructure.​

The political class’s failure to prioritize regional collaboration and resource utilization has led to economic disenfranchisement. Citizens must demand accountability and elect leaders committed to harnessing Africa’s wealth for its people. By fostering intra-African trade and investing in regional infrastructure, Africa can transform its economic landscape, ensuring prosperity and self-reliance.​

The time for change is now. Africa’s wealth should serve its people, not external interests. By uniting and leveraging regional resources, Africa can chart a path toward sustainable development and economic empowerment.

Leadership is not merely about occupying public office or winning elections; it is about vision, integrity, competence, and service to the people. The difference between prosperity and poverty, between dignity and humiliation, between independence and dependency—often lies in the quality of leadership a nation embraces.

The right leadership charts a course that transforms raw potential into real progress, harnessing resources for the public good, securing fair trade for national benefit, and safeguarding the dignity of its people both at home and abroad. When we elect leaders based on tribal lines, populist slogans, or party loyalties without scrutinizing their capacity and character, we surrender our futures to mediocrity and corruption.

In every successful nation, leadership has been the catalyst. Singapore under Lee Kuan Yew, Rwanda under Paul Kagame, and Botswana under Seretse Khama all point to the transformative power of committed, visionary, and disciplined governance. They show us that Africa is not cursed, only poorly led.

We do not lack talent, we lack ethical stewards of the people’s power and purse. The right leadership invests in education, strengthens institutions, promotes local production, and places the interest of citizens above personal enrichment. Leadership matters because it is the fulcrum on which all other aspects of a nation’s life pivot.

The wrong leadership, however, entrenches dependency, erodes confidence, and enables exploitation—both by foreign actors and by a greedy domestic elite. It leads to policies that favor multinationals over local entrepreneurs, that enrich foreign economies while hollowing out local industries, and that result in a working class crushed by poor wages and shrinking opportunities.

It is bad leadership that causes Zambians to be treated like second-class citizens in Chinese-owned restaurants on their own soil. It is the same leadership that keeps African children hungry while exporting fish, cocoa, gold, and copper at giveaway prices.

Africa is not poor; it has been poorly led. The continent is not weak; it is weakened by those elected to defend its dignity. Our call today is not just for change—it is for better, wiser, and braver leadership. Leaders who see beyond five-year election cycles and understand the long arc of national transformation.

Leaders who will turn the tide of exploitation into one of economic sovereignty. Leaders who will make it expensive to disrespect an African in Windhoek, Lusaka, or Nairobi. Africa is waiting, but not forever. The time to choose rightly is now.

Read Also: North American And Middle Eastern Investors Drive New Wave Of African Capital Flows

The youth of Africa stand at a crossroads in history, where silence will mean surrender and action will reclaim destiny. The inheritance of Africa—its land, its minerals, its fertile fields, its rivers, its intellectual and creative capital—does not belong to foreign corporations or old colonial powers.

It belongs to the young people who walk its streets, till its soil, build its tech hubs, and sing its anthems. Yet this inheritance is being looted in plain sight, auctioned by complicit leaders to the highest foreign bidder. If African youth do not rise now, they risk becoming slaves on their land, watching Chinese-owned farms feed Europe, while their siblings sleep hungry.

Rising is no longer just an option; it is a sacred obligation. Every mine sold for pennies, every policy skewed against local innovation, every trade deal that imports what we already produce robs young Africans of jobs, dignity, and their rightful share in the wealth of their nations. The youth must break the spell of indifference, demand accountability, and become the stewards of Africa’s rebirth. The world fears a united, awakened African youth because they know that once Africa’s young stand up, no empire can stand against them. This is not just political; it is deeply spiritual. To rise is to honor the blood of ancestors and to protect the future of generations unborn.

Today’s African youth are more educated, more connected, and more resilient than any generation before. But education without mobilization is a tragedy. Social media must become a tool of resistance, not just entertainment. Degrees must translate into community leadership, innovation, and advocacy. The future of Africa is not in Europe or Asia—it is in the hands of the African youth. They must guard it fiercely, nurture it, and never again allow it to be sold for crumbs. Let them rise not with hate, but with resolve; not with chaos, but with clarity; not with violence, but with a bold demand for structural justice.

If they fail to rise, history will not forgive them. If they rise, history will remember them as the generation that reclaimed the continent. There is still time, but not much. Africa is not waiting—it is calling. And its youth must answer.

Read Also: Africa Is Not the Future Market, But The Market