Nairobi Motorists To Face New Parking Fee As County Adopts Cost-Based Pricing Policy

Motorists in Nairobi to face changes in parking fee over the next few years after the Nairobi City County Government adopted a new Tariffs and Pricing Policy that seeks to align parking fees with the actual cost of providing and maintaining parking services.
According to the Nairobi City County Tariffs and Pricing Policy 2025-2030 outline a major shift in how the county intends to determine parking charges, moving away from the long-standing pricing system that has largely depended on outdated Nairobi City Council by-laws and annual revisions through the County Finance Act.
County officials say the new policy is aimed at creating a more transparent, fair and sustainable pricing framework that ensures motorists’ parking payments are directly linked to the services they receive.
According to the policy document, the current parking tariff structure has several weaknesses that have limited its effectiveness over the years. Among the concerns raised is the lack of transparency on how revenue collected from motorists is spent, despite parking fees being one of the county’s key own-source revenue streams.
The county notes that many motorists have little information on how the money collected from daily parking charges contributes to improving services such as road maintenance, traffic management, street lighting, parking infrastructure and security within the city.
“Parking tariffs in Nairobi are largely set using legacy provisions from the Nairobi City Council by-laws, updated annually through the County Finance Act,” the policy states.
The document further points out that although proposals have previously been made to introduce zonal pricing, where parking charges would vary depending on location, congestion levels and land value, the system has never been fully implemented.
Under such a model, motorists parking within highly congested areas such as the Central Business District (CBD) would likely pay different rates compared to those parking in residential estates or less busy parts of the city.
“The zonal pricing approach, proposed in recent years to reflect congestion levels and land value (for example the CBD versus estate zones), has yet to be fully operationalised,” the county says.
The county also acknowledges that while it has made significant progress in digitising parking payments through platforms such as e-Parking, technology alone has not addressed concerns surrounding accountability and transparency.
According to the policy, although digital payment systems have made it easier for motorists to pay parking fees, there remains limited public information showing how the revenue generated is invested back into improving parking facilities and related transport services.
Officials argue that another major weakness of the current system is the absence of a comprehensive pricing policy capable of supporting regular, evidence-based reviews of parking charges.
Instead of relying on historical pricing models or periodic adjustments through finance legislation, the county now wants future tariff reviews to be guided by data such as parking demand, occupancy levels, infrastructure maintenance costs and peak-hour usage.
As part of developing the new framework, Nairobi County conducted a detailed cost analysis of its parking infrastructure to establish the actual cost of constructing and maintaining parking facilities across the city.
The assessment estimates that building and maintaining one standard parking bay costs approximately Ksh209,464 over its lifespan.
With Nairobi currently operating around 16,900 parking spaces, the county estimates that the total cost of constructing and maintaining the parking infrastructure stands at approximately Ksh3.54 billion.
“The estimated cost of constructing and maintaining one parking slot was found to be Ksh209,464. Considering the County has 16,900 parking slots, the total cost for constructing and maintaining parking is Ksh3,539,946,429,” the policy states.
The document further explains that if the county were to recover these costs over a 20-year period, it would need to generate roughly Ksh177 million annually from parking services.
County officials say this analysis provides a more realistic basis for determining future parking tariffs while ensuring that the pricing structure reflects the actual cost of maintaining parking infrastructure instead of relying on outdated estimates.
Despite concerns that the policy could pave the way for higher parking charges, the county has clarified that the document does not automatically introduce new parking fees or increase existing rates.
Instead, it establishes the principles and methodology that will guide future tariff reviews across county services, including parking.
Any proposal to revise parking charges will still have to undergo public participation before being tabled in the Nairobi City County Finance Act for approval by the County Assembly
This means motorists will have an opportunity to give their views before any new parking rates can be implemented.
The parking policy forms part of a broader county strategy aimed at reforming how fees and user charges are determined across all county services.
According to the county, the new Tariffs and Pricing Policy seek to replace fragmented pricing systems that have developed over the years with a single, standardised framework based on cost recovery, efficiency, fairness and transparency.
Officials believe the unified approach will strengthen revenue collection, improve financial sustainability and ensure that user charges are based on clear economic principles rather than historical practices.
If fully implemented, the framework is expected to guide future reviews of not only parking fees but also other county charges, with adjustments being informed by evidence, service delivery costs and changing demand instead of relying solely on outdated by-laws.
Read Also: Nairobi County Government Sets Date For Parking Fee Increase
- January 2026 (220)
- February 2026 (248)
- March 2026 (287)
- April 2026 (208)
- May 2026 (191)
- June 2026 (238)
- July 2026 (279)
- August 2026 (98)
- January 2025 (119)
- February 2025 (191)
- March 2025 (212)
- April 2025 (193)
- May 2025 (161)
- June 2025 (157)
- July 2025 (227)
- August 2025 (211)
- September 2025 (267)
- October 2025 (297)
- November 2025 (230)
- December 2025 (220)
- January 2024 (238)
- February 2024 (227)
- March 2024 (190)
- April 2024 (133)
- May 2024 (157)
- June 2024 (145)
- July 2024 (136)
- August 2024 (154)
- September 2024 (212)
- October 2024 (255)
- November 2024 (196)
- December 2024 (143)
- January 2023 (182)
- February 2023 (203)
- March 2023 (322)
- April 2023 (297)
- May 2023 (267)
- June 2023 (214)
- July 2023 (212)
- August 2023 (257)
- September 2023 (237)
- October 2023 (264)
- November 2023 (286)
- December 2023 (177)
- January 2022 (293)
- February 2022 (329)
- March 2022 (358)
- April 2022 (292)
- May 2022 (271)
- June 2022 (232)
- July 2022 (278)
- August 2022 (253)
- September 2022 (246)
- October 2022 (196)
- November 2022 (232)
- December 2022 (167)
- January 2021 (182)
- February 2021 (227)
- March 2021 (325)
- April 2021 (259)
- May 2021 (285)
- June 2021 (272)
- July 2021 (277)
- August 2021 (232)
- September 2021 (271)
- October 2021 (304)
- November 2021 (364)
- December 2021 (249)
- January 2020 (272)
- February 2020 (310)
- March 2020 (390)
- April 2020 (321)
- May 2020 (335)
- June 2020 (327)
- July 2020 (333)
- August 2020 (276)
- September 2020 (214)
- October 2020 (233)
- November 2020 (242)
- December 2020 (187)
- January 2019 (251)
- February 2019 (215)
- March 2019 (283)
- April 2019 (254)
- May 2019 (269)
- June 2019 (249)
- July 2019 (335)
- August 2019 (292)
- September 2019 (306)
- October 2019 (313)
- November 2019 (362)
- December 2019 (318)
- January 2018 (291)
- February 2018 (213)
- March 2018 (275)
- April 2018 (223)
- May 2018 (235)
- June 2018 (176)
- July 2018 (256)
- August 2018 (247)
- September 2018 (255)
- October 2018 (282)
- November 2018 (282)
- December 2018 (184)
- January 2017 (183)
- February 2017 (194)
- March 2017 (207)
- April 2017 (104)
- May 2017 (169)
- June 2017 (205)
- July 2017 (189)
- August 2017 (195)
- September 2017 (186)
- October 2017 (235)
- November 2017 (253)
- December 2017 (266)
- January 2016 (164)
- February 2016 (165)
- March 2016 (189)
- April 2016 (143)
- May 2016 (245)
- June 2016 (182)
- July 2016 (271)
- August 2016 (247)
- September 2016 (233)
- October 2016 (191)
- November 2016 (243)
- December 2016 (153)
- January 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (164)
- April 2015 (107)
- May 2015 (116)
- June 2015 (119)
- July 2015 (145)
- August 2015 (157)
- September 2015 (186)
- October 2015 (169)
- November 2015 (173)
- December 2015 (205)
- March 2014 (2)
- March 2013 (10)
- June 2013 (1)
- March 2012 (7)
- April 2012 (15)
- May 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (4)
- October 2012 (2)
- November 2012 (2)
- December 2012 (1)
