Government Demanded Kenyans’ Data From Facebook

By Wilkister Alao / November 21, 2019 | 12:30 pm




A recent transparency report by social networking site, Facebook, shows that the government demanded that the company gives them private details of five Kenyan citizens in the first half of 2019.

Facebook further revealed that while the state wanted to have access to private information of five of its citizens, it refused to follow the right procedure of getting such kind of information four times.

In their report, Facebook noted that the company is keen on protecting user details, but should the government require private information about any Facebook user, then the government in question has to use the right legal channel to be able to obtain the information.

Facebook’s statement explained that any time information about their users is needed, the request is carefully reviewed before any details are revealed. Sometimes, the company demands detailed specificity if the request seems to have gone overboard, yet sometimes the requests are rejected.

In the case of the five individuals whose data was required ‘urgently’ according to what the state said, Facebook complied with only one of the state’s request.

Facebook, however, did not reveal the names or the kind of details the government wanted from these users.

READ: WhatsApp And Facebook Admins To Get Clearance From CA

Still, in the first half of 2019, Facebook said that the state requested that account information of seven users be preserved.

“For cases of preservation of accounts, we take a temporary snapshot of the relevant information, but do not disclose it until the formal legal process is initiated,” said Facebook in a statement.

Facebook reports that it is not the first time the government of Kenya is requesting for private details of users as, in the past years, such requests have been made, more especially during electioneering periods.

In 2017 for instance, the government filed eight requests for Facebook and wanted details of 11 google accounts in 2013.

Meanwhile, a bill was tabled to parliament to have bloggers regulated or be fined 500,000 shillings or serve a two-year jail term if they fail to comply with the regulations that will be set by the Communications Authority.

Although this proposal has been condemned, with concerned industries saying that such rules will mess up the freedom of expression of Kenyans, the Information and Communications (Amendment) Bill, 2019 are due for second reading in parliament, which raises the question, does the government want to stifle the freedom of expression?







More Articles From This Author







Trending Stories










Other Related Articles










SOKO DIRECTORY & FINANCIAL GUIDE



ARCHIVES

2020
  • January 2020 (272)
  • February 2020 (310)
  • March 2020 (390)
  • April 2020 (321)
  • May 2020 (336)
  • June 2020 (329)
  • July 2020 (335)
  • August 2020 (65)
  • 2019
  • January 2019 (253)
  • February 2019 (216)
  • March 2019 (285)
  • April 2019 (254)
  • May 2019 (272)
  • June 2019 (251)
  • July 2019 (338)
  • August 2019 (293)
  • September 2019 (306)
  • October 2019 (313)
  • November 2019 (362)
  • December 2019 (320)
  • 2018
  • January 2018 (291)
  • February 2018 (219)
  • March 2018 (278)
  • April 2018 (225)
  • May 2018 (238)
  • June 2018 (178)
  • July 2018 (256)
  • August 2018 (249)
  • September 2018 (256)
  • October 2018 (287)
  • November 2018 (284)
  • December 2018 (185)
  • 2017
  • January 2017 (183)
  • February 2017 (194)
  • March 2017 (207)
  • April 2017 (104)
  • May 2017 (169)
  • June 2017 (205)
  • July 2017 (190)
  • August 2017 (195)
  • September 2017 (186)
  • October 2017 (235)
  • November 2017 (253)
  • December 2017 (266)
  • 2016
  • January 2016 (165)
  • February 2016 (165)
  • March 2016 (190)
  • April 2016 (143)
  • May 2016 (245)
  • June 2016 (182)
  • July 2016 (271)
  • August 2016 (248)
  • September 2016 (234)
  • October 2016 (191)
  • November 2016 (243)
  • December 2016 (153)
  • 2015
  • January 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (166)
  • April 2015 (108)
  • May 2015 (116)
  • June 2015 (120)
  • July 2015 (148)
  • August 2015 (157)
  • September 2015 (188)
  • October 2015 (169)
  • November 2015 (173)
  • December 2015 (207)
  • 2014
  • March 2014 (2)
  • 2013
  • March 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • 2012
  • March 2012 (7)
  • April 2012 (15)
  • May 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (2)
  • November 2012 (2)
  • December 2012 (1)
  • 2011
    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006
    2005
    2004
    2003
    2002
    2001
    2000
    1999
    1998
    1997
    1996
    1995
    1994
    1993
    1992
    1991
    1990
    1989
    1988
    1987
    1986
    1985
    1984
    1983
    1982
    1981
    1980
    1979
    1978
    1977
    1976
    1975
    1974
    1973
    1972
    1971
    1970
    1969
    1968
    1967
    1966
    1965
    1964
    1963
    1962
    1961
    1960
    1959
    1958
    1957
    1956
    1955
    1954
    1953
    1952
    1951
    1950